Pedestrian Trapped Under Cruise Vehicle in San Francisco

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

On Monday, a pedestrian ended up being trapped beneath an autonomous test vehicle owned by Cruise. The incident took place in San Francisco (Fifth Avenue just south of Market Street) and has already become the subject of some rampant speculation as the company hopes to avoid another public relations nightmare.

Cruise quickly put out a series of statements via Twitter (now X) claiming the pedestrian was actually tossed in front of their robotaxi after being struck by a hit-and-run vehicle that was traveling in the accompanying lane. While the investigation is technically ongoing, numerous media outlets have run with the premise after having seen the on-board footage.


According to local outlet KRON4, police reported that they found the victim trapped under the autonomous car after arriving on the scene at about 9:30 at night — adding that a human-driven vehicle “may have been initially involved in the collision.”


From KRON4:


Firefighters were able to communicate with Cruise operators before crews used heavy rescue tools to lift the autonomous vehicle, the San Francisco Fire Department said. The woman was suffering “multiple traumatic injuries” and was pulled to safety, according to fire officials. SFPD officers rendered aid before the woman was hospitalized. The current condition of the victim is unknown at this time.
The Cruise car was uninhabited at the time of the collision and remained at the scene. In a statement to KRON4, Cruise said its vehicle “braked aggressively to minimize the impact” and also suggested there was an initial impact from a hit-and-run driver. “Our heartfelt concern and focus is the wellbeing of the person who was injured and we are actively working with police to help identify the responsible driver,” Cruise said.


Subsequent reporting from other outlets has been more willing to entertain the claims provided by Cruise and they may indeed be true. Police have said that they’re working with the company to get to the bottom of what happened and Cruise has said it’s sharing video footage with the SFPD as part of the investigation.


The relevant video has also reportedly been seen by a few media outlets, with NBC Bay Area's Bigad Shaban effectively claiming that things happened more-or-less as Cruise has said. But there’s a lot of bad blood between San Francisco residents and the recently expanded robotaxi services. Some are already demanding the footage be released to the public immediately.


While there have been loads of unsavory encounters between humans and autonomous test vehicles, we haven’t seen any pedestrians seriously injured since the fatal incident from March of 2018 where a Volvo-badged test mule owned by Uber Technologies struck a woman pushing her bicycle across the road. At the time, every company involved blamed everyone else with Uber being the preferred target.


Your author threw the brunt of the blame at the vehicle’s safety driver and speculated that this was more evidence of how advanced driving aids encourage operator disengagement. While the victim had opted to traverse the street outside the designated crosswalk, footage from the incident clearly showed the driver looking down at their phone in the moments leading up to the fatal accident. In July of 2023, that driver pleaded guilty to one count of endangerment and was sentenced to three years’ probation.


Uber probably was culpable to some degree, as its technology simultaneously failed. But the courts decided it couldn’t be held liable after Arizona prosecutors decided not to go after the company in 2019. It was decided that the onus was primarily on the human operator and established a nice precedent for companies hoping to field autonomous vehicles on public roads.


But the Cruise vehicle didn’t have a human safety driver — making things a little more difficult.


The crash has reportedly yet to be filed with the Department of Motor Vehicles, which requires all AV companies to report collisions. But it’s presumably just a matter of time before that happens.


There are a lot of different angles to look at this from. While the San Francisco Fire Department and numerous city officials have accused Cruise vehicles of running amok, the San Francisco Police Department has frequently been accused of using Cruise AVs as mobile surveillance units with locals accusing both entities of violating citizens’ Fourth Amendment rights. While the details on exactly how that works are quite muddy, due to how little information either party is willing to share about the matter, it’s been made crystal clear that Cruise has handed over footage without law enforcement going through the proper procedures.


This has resulted in accusations that the SFPD is protecting Cruise in regard to the latest incident. However, those claims have been made on some shaky ground and revolve primarily around the fact that nobody has bothered to release the relevant footage to the public. With so much preexisting ire against San Francisco’s autonomous vehicles, citizens are ready to assume the worst without the accompanying evidence. 


There are also loads of legal issues present that don't have a lot of legal precedent. When a human driver messes up and there's solid supportive evidence, it's relatively easy to decide who is culpable. But adding in a bunch of self-driving features pushes things into a foggy area that becomes downright unprecedented once flesh-and-blood drivers are taken out of the equation.


Meanwhile, Cruise is doing its utmost to downplay the matter — which is to be expected.


As with the fatal Uber crash, it’ll probably be some time before we have a clear understanding of what actually happened here. It was days before video footage of the Uber incident was shared and even then it was months before speculation on the topic settled down. The only thing that seems certain is the fact that the robotaxi ended up being entangled with a pedestrian for some time, requiring the fire department to launch a rescue mission.


That woman's status and name are currently unknown. However, it was reported that she had sustained multiple traumatic injuries at the time of the accident.


[Image: Cruise]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • El scotto El scotto on Oct 03, 2023

    Human safety driver? Some on here need a human safety thinker.

  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on Oct 04, 2023

    Pedestrian.... trapped.... in San Francisco.


    Man, there's a lot of truth in this article.

  • Redapple2 I gave up on Honda. My 09 Accord Vs my 03. The 09s- V 6 had a slight shudder when deactivating cylinders. And the 09 did not have the 03 's electro luminescent gages. And the 09 had the most uncomfortable seats. My brother bought his 3rd and last Honda CRV. Brutal seats after 25 minutes. NOW, We are forever Toyota, Lexus, Subaru people now despite HAVING ACCESS TO gm EMPLOYEE DISCOUNT. Despite having access to the gm employee discount. Man, that is a massive statement. Wow that s bad - Under no circumstances will I have that govna crap.
  • Redapple2 Front tag obscured. Rear tag - clear and sharp. Huh?
  • Redapple2 I can state what NOT to buy. HK. High theft. Insurance. Unrefined NVH. Rapidly degrading interiors. HK? No way !
  • Luke42 Serious answer:Now that I DD an EV, buying an EV to replace my wife’s Honda Civic is in the queue. My wife likes her Honda, she likes Apple CarPlay, and she can’t stand Elon Musk - so Tesla starts the competition with two demerit-points and Honda starts the competition with one merit-point.The Honda Prologue looked like a great candidate until Honda announced that the partnership with GM was a one-off thing and that their future EVs would be designed in-house.Now I’m more inclined toward the Blazer EV, the vehicle on which the Prologue is based. The Blazer EV and the Ultium platform won’t be orphaned by GM any time soon. But then I have to convince my wife she would like it better than her Honda Civic, and that’s a heavy lift because she doesn’t have any reason to be dissatisfied with her current car (I take care of all of the ICE-hassles for her).Since my wife’s Honda Civic is holding up well, since she likes the car, and since I take care of most of the drawbacks of drawbacks of ICE ownership for her, there’s no urgency to replace this vehicle.Honestly, if a paid-off Honda Civic is my wife’s automotive hill to die on, that’s a pretty good place to be - even though I personally have to continue dealing the hassles and expenses of ICE ownership on her behalf.My plan is simply to wait-and-see what Honda does next. Maybe they’ll introduce the perfect EV for her one day, and I’ll just go buy it.
  • 2ACL I have a soft spot for high-performance, shark-nosed Lancers (I considered the less-potent Ralliart during the period in which I eventually selected my first TL SH-AWD), but it's can be challenging to find a specimen that doesn't exhibit signs of abuse, and while most of the components are sufficiently universal in their function to service without manufacturer support, the SST isn't one of them. The shops that specialize in it are familiar with the failure as described by the seller and thus might be able to fix this one at a substantial savings to replacement. There's only a handful of them in the nation, however. A salvaged unit is another option, but the usual risks are magnified by similar logistical challenges to trying to save the original.I hope this is a case of the seller overvaluing the Evo market rather than still owing or having put the mods on credit. Because the best offer won't be anywhere near the current listing.
Next