Tesla Notches a Win in Early Lawsuit for Deadly Autopilot Crash

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Tesla has seemed to be in constant legal peril over the last couple of years, as several high-profile crashes involving its semi-autonomous driving functions have led to investigations and lawsuits. Even so, the automaker was victorious in one of its first trials, which ended earlier this week.


The trial, which ended on October 31, was for allegations that its Autopilot driver assist tech caused a fatal crash. Despite its name and the misleading title of Tesla’s other assistance system, Full Self-Driving, none of the automaker’s technologies make its vehicles self-driving. The names came under scrutiny in the trial, with the prosecution asking a Tesla engineer if he felt the automaker created them to give the impression that vehicles were truly autonomous. He gave a “no” answer, but the U.S. Department of Justice has an open criminal probe focused on the topic, so we’ll probably hear more about that soon.


This lawsuit ended with the jury deciding that the driver was ultimately liable and that the Tesla did not have a manufacturing defect, but the issues they were asked to sort through were confusing and convoluted. Though some suits focus on how Autopilot is designed and its potential for abuse, the jury in this latest case only had to evaluate whether a defect impacted the vehicle’s steering system.


Tesla was pleased with the result, saying that its vehicles make the roads safer. The decision also illustrates an interesting view by the jury that the driver is ultimately responsible, even when the vehicle is doing most of the work. The question of liability is significant and is one of the biggest threats to autonomous vehicles. No automaker is going to jump at the opportunity to be sued for millions if someone abuses an autonomous vehicle, so it will be interesting to see how the rest of Tesla’s cases play out.


[Image: TierneyMJ via Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Nov 01, 2023

    Automotive jury trials are weird.

    (I know this because I got rejected as a prospective juror for one. LOL.)

  • Crown Crown on Nov 01, 2023

    It wasn't a "defect", it was false advertisement- "Full Self Driving"

  • SPPPP I am actually a pretty big Alfa fan ... and that is why I hate this car.
  • SCE to AUX They're spending billions on this venture, so I hope so.Investing during a lull in the EV market seems like a smart move - "buy low, sell high" and all that.Key for Honda will be achieving high efficiency in its EVs, something not everybody can do.
  • ChristianWimmer It might be overpriced for most, but probably not for the affluent city-dwellers who these are targeted at - we have tons of them in Munich where I live so I “get it”. I just think these look so terribly cheap and weird from a design POV.
  • NotMyCircusNotMyMonkeys so many people here fellating musks fat sack, or hodling the baggies for TSLA. which are you?
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Canadians are able to win?
Next