Midsize Sedan Deathwatch #16: The Decline of the Midsize Class's Middle Class

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Ever more minor midsize players continued to see their share of America’s midsize sedan segment dwindle in September 2017. The cause: domination on the part of America’s two major midsize cars.

The all-new 2018 Toyota Camry enjoyed its first full month of meaningful availability in September and produced a 13-percent year-over-year U.S. sales improvement as a result. Meanwhile, Honda is clearing out remaining 2017 Accords in advance of the all-new 2018 Accord’s arrival this fall. Honda’s efforts produced a 10-percent uptick compared with September 2016.

Yet despite the big gains from the two major players, the upper class, the midsize segment still declined 7 percent in September because of sharp declines by many members of the middle class.

That means Camry and Accord market share continues to rise. That means the slice of the market earned by the middle class continues to shrink.

This is the sixteenth edition of TTAC’s Midsize Sedan Deathwatch. The midsize sedan as we know it — “midsizedus sedanicus” in the original latin — isn’t going anywhere any time soon, but the ongoing sales contraction will result in a reduction of mainstream intermediate sedans in the U.S. market.

How do we know? It already has.

It’s not a new story, but it’s a story exacerbated by the transition from generation of the Camry to another. In September 2016, the Camry and Accord combined for 34 percent of the midsize market. One year later, the top-selling duo’s slice shot up not a little bit to 41 percent, a startling shift that came at the expense of vehicles such as the Nissan Altima, Hyundai Sonata, and Volkswagen Passat most of all.

That trio of mid-pack cars owned just 20 percent of America’s midsize sedan segment in September 2017, down seven percentage points from a year ago.

Of course, a market share loss of that magnitude doesn’t come merely because of the success of top-tier models. Nissan, Hyundai, and Volkswagen reported Altima, Sonata, and Passat declines of 34 percent, 36 percent, and 27 percent respectively. Nor were sharp declines reported by that trio the only momentous decreases. The Subaru Legacy tumbled 35 percent, the Mazda 6 was down 25 percent, the transitioning and semi-upmarket Buick Regal tumbled 57 percent. Unexpected were the improvements reported by the Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Malibu, and Kia Optima, a trio of midsize cars that’s still failing to match last year’s pace on year-to-date terms.

Despite a handful of cars that posted notable improvements, the midsize segment’s decline was still twice as harsh as the overall passenger car sector’s slide. Midsize cars accounted for 10.4 percent of America’s new vehicle sales in September 2017, down from 11.9 percent a year ago.

Five years ago, midsize cars accounted for more than 16 percent of U.S. new vehicle sales and the Camry and Accord produced “only” 3 out of every 10 sales in the midsize segment. Now the duo generates 4 out of every 10 midsize car sales.

The rich get richer.

[Image: Hyundai. Chart: The Truth About Cars]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars and Instagram.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 35 comments
  • Lastwgn Lastwgn on Oct 06, 2017

    Here's my story on this subject. This summer we needed to revise our fleet. It consisted of a CX-3, an RX-8 and a Miata. Needed a true 5 passenger car and the rotary was, sadly, losing compression. Best car ever but for that. Wife's car was the CX-3. She really liked it after driving a Tribute for 10 years. I went to the Mazda dealer fully intending to buy a top of the line Mazda6. Drove the car. Very, very fine car. But, something was missing. What I would refer to as the "hoot to drive" factor. It was just not as tossable as I wanted. My wife would not have wanted a 6 because due to hip and back pains does not like to get too far down into a car on a daily basis. Which is why the CX-3 and not the 3. My plan then shifted. I get the CX-3, which on a daily basis is a hoot to drive, and she could have a CX-5. So I drive a CX-5. Much as I am a car guy, I found the dynamics of the 2017 CX-5 to be better than the 6. I was personally stunned, but from a seat of the pants feel, the CX-5 was blast where the 6 was exceptionally refined. Bottom line, I went to the dealer to buy a fully optioned 6 GT and left with a new CX-5 Touring. My wife loves the CX-5 and will likely drive that for another 10 years just like her Tribute. I have the CX-3 for the time being, and we still have the Miata for summer cruises. In looking back on it, what I realized is that the 6 has a much longer wheelbase than the CX-5. Keep in mind that the CX-5 is based on the 3 and it begins to make some sense why the CX-5 dynamics were so much better feeling to me. The CX-3? It is not based on the 3 but based on the 2, which is why its dynamics are different still, even different from that of the Mazda3. So we now have the sports car, the fun and thrifty and maneuverable commuter, and the slightly larger ute for carrying 5 people comfortably as well as plenty of luggage space. But it is the vehicle dynamics of the CX-5 being so good that cost at least one sale of a Mazda6 this past July.

    • Mike978 Mike978 on Oct 08, 2017

      Thanks for sharing, interesting views. I can see why CUVs do well. Now I just want to see a CX5 Signature 2.5T

  • Tankinbeans Tankinbeans on Oct 06, 2017

    I have to wonder when the pendulum will swing back. It'll be interesting to see how many manufacturers get caught with their pants down because they don't offer a decent midsizer when/of fuel prices spike again. I drove a Honda Accord Sport back to back with a Mazda6 Touring and agree the Honda felt and looked extremely cheap in comparison. The dealer also left a lot to be desired.

  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
  • SPPPP I am actually a pretty big Alfa fan ... and that is why I hate this car.
  • SCE to AUX They're spending billions on this venture, so I hope so.Investing during a lull in the EV market seems like a smart move - "buy low, sell high" and all that.Key for Honda will be achieving high efficiency in its EVs, something not everybody can do.
  • ChristianWimmer It might be overpriced for most, but probably not for the affluent city-dwellers who these are targeted at - we have tons of them in Munich where I live so I “get it”. I just think these look so terribly cheap and weird from a design POV.
Next