Mercedes-AMG Unveils New GLC Coupe

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Yes, we know – news of a crossover with ‘coupe-like’ styling isn’t likely to raise the pulse of many commenters, especially one painted approximately the same color as the pavement on which it is driven. The new GLC Coupe may be a stern German shown in a dour shade of paint, but its 671 horsepower and 752 lb-ft of torque make it anything but boring.


Billed as the brand’s “first performance hybrid SUV coupe”, the GLC 63 S E Performance Coupe does cut a handsome if immediately recognizable figure. Appending that five-letter word to its name ensures the thing has a lot more sport than utility thanks to its dramatic roofline which cuts sharply into cargo space compared to a normal GLC. Alert readers will have correctly determined there is some form of electrification under the hood, tipped off by the ‘E Performance’ moniker and the fact that just about everything introduced these days has some measure of juice on board.


In this example, the 63 variant combines a 2.0-liter turbo engine with an electric drive unit on the rear axle. This combo is good for the aforementioned 671 ponies and 752 lb-ft of twist and funnels its power through a nine-speed transmission and 4Matic all-wheel drive. If you care, the engine itself contributes 469 horses and 402 torques to this equation. Score one for its electric drive unit, though it is worth noting that buried in the bumf is a notation the electrified guts make their maximum grunt of 201hp for 10 seconds at a time; its continuous output is 107 horses. In other words, it seems like the GLC 63 S E Performance Coupe will belt out a total of 576 horsepower in most conditions, with the full-fat 671 figure reserved for launches and the like. A lightweight 6.1-kWh battery is located above the rear axle.

An entry-level model called the GLC 43 4Matic Coupe, also powered by a 2.0L four banger, is able to produce 416 horsepower plus an additional 14 ponies via a belt-driven starter generator at lower engine speeds. Like the 63 trim, it gets the nine-speed automatic which deploys a wet starting clutch in place of a torque converter. Merc estimates this model will scamper to 60 mph from rest in about 4.8 seconds while it more powerful brother will run the course in approximately 3.5 ticks of the clock. It is worth mentioning the weight disparity, with the 43 listed at 4,389 pounds while the 63 bends the scales at nearly 5,100 pounds despite both cars setting down identical footprints. Electrified guts tend to be tremendously heavy, after all.


The cabin is typical Mercedes, which is to say stern but comfortable with a duo of enormous screens up front. As with so many models from the brand these days, a landscape tablet sits ahead of the driver serving duty as a gauge cluster while a portrait tablet dominates the center stack as mission control for infotainment. Both can be configured umpteen different ways, with the likes of AMG Track Pace tools and an AMG-exclusive display style on hand so owners can brag to their passengers.

Expect to see these machines in 2024, though the 43 and 63 may end up being different model years.


[Image: Mercedes-Benz]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Sep 26, 2023

    Does this monster above its weight? I am very impressed.

  • El scotto El scotto on Sep 26, 2023

    -channeling my inner Kenneth Mars- It is a coupe because Merzedes say's it est une kupe! Quiet schweinhunds! Dis is zee best kupe in zee vorld! Merzedes says so! Zee best or nothing Mein Herrs!

  • Redapple2 I gave up on Honda. My 09 Accord Vs my 03. The 09s- V 6 had a slight shudder when deactivating cylinders. And the 09 did not have the 03 's electro luminescent gages. And the 09 had the most uncomfortable seats. My brother bought his 3rd and last Honda CRV. Brutal seats after 25 minutes. NOW, We are forever Toyota, Lexus, Subaru people now despite HAVING ACCESS TO gm EMPLOYEE DISCOUNT. Despite having access to the gm employee discount. Man, that is a massive statement. Wow that s bad - Under no circumstances will I have that govna crap.
  • Redapple2 Front tag obscured. Rear tag - clear and sharp. Huh?
  • Redapple2 I can state what NOT to buy. HK. High theft. Insurance. Unrefined NVH. Rapidly degrading interiors. HK? No way !
  • Luke42 Serious answer:Now that I DD an EV, buying an EV to replace my wife’s Honda Civic is in the queue. My wife likes her Honda, she likes Apple CarPlay, and she can’t stand Elon Musk - so Tesla starts the competition with two demerit-points and Honda starts the competition with one merit-point.The Honda Prologue looked like a great candidate until Honda announced that the partnership with GM was a one-off thing and that their future EVs would be designed in-house.Now I’m more inclined toward the Blazer EV, the vehicle on which the Prologue is based. The Blazer EV and the Ultium platform won’t be orphaned by GM any time soon. But then I have to convince my wife she would like it better than her Honda Civic, and that’s a heavy lift because she doesn’t have any reason to be dissatisfied with her current car (I take care of all of the ICE-hassles for her).Since my wife’s Honda Civic is holding up well, since she likes the car, and since I take care of most of the drawbacks of drawbacks of ICE ownership for her, there’s no urgency to replace this vehicle.Honestly, if a paid-off Honda Civic is my wife’s automotive hill to die on, that’s a pretty good place to be - even though I personally have to continue dealing the hassles and expenses of ICE ownership on her behalf.My plan is simply to wait-and-see what Honda does next. Maybe they’ll introduce the perfect EV for her one day, and I’ll just go buy it.
  • 2ACL I have a soft spot for high-performance, shark-nosed Lancers (I considered the less-potent Ralliart during the period in which I eventually selected my first TL SH-AWD), but it's can be challenging to find a specimen that doesn't exhibit signs of abuse, and while most of the components are sufficiently universal in their function to service without manufacturer support, the SST isn't one of them. The shops that specialize in it are familiar with the failure as described by the seller and thus might be able to fix this one at a substantial savings to replacement. There's only a handful of them in the nation, however. A salvaged unit is another option, but the usual risks are magnified by similar logistical challenges to trying to save the original.I hope this is a case of the seller overvaluing the Evo market rather than still owing or having put the mods on credit. Because the best offer won't be anywhere near the current listing.
Next