Indonesia is Suffering the Consequences of China's EV Explosion

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Electric vehicle naysayers love to talk about the environmental impact of mining raw materials for batteries. While those arguments are often rooted in some degree of truth, they’re generally made as the only argument and are levied without much evidence for support. Though it’s true that mining and processing nickel, cobalt, lithium, and other materials is awful for the environment, we’re learning more about the geopolitical and financial implications of the practice. 


Jalopnik reported that a Chinese nickel refinery’s operation in Indonesia is destroying the local ecosystem and accelerating the decline in natural habitats for wildlife. The Indonesia Morwali Industrial Park is located on a large island in the country and has released so much pollution over the last ten years that locals can’t fish or use the water. 


People report warming waters and fewer fish, and in some cases, the once-bountiful rivers have turned into trickling streams of mud. Workers at the facility report sickness from inhaling chemicals and ash from the mining processes. For China, the impacts are far away and seemingly unimportant. Its financial resources and size give it a great deal of power in the arrangement, as the giant nation has invested billions and amassed a 61 percent stake in the total nickel production. 


As Jalopnik pointed out, the negative impacts of this partnership are felt solely by Indonesia. China is some 5,000 miles away from the island nation and has little concern for the destruction happening so far from its doorstep. As demand for electric vehicles accelerates, we’re likely to hear about more of these situations, and other such problems are going on right now. 


Earlier this year, Tesla agreed to invest billions of dollars in nickel and a potential battery factory in the country over the next few years. It seems odd that Indonesia would continue pursuing such investments, knowing the havoc they wreak on its environment. Still, it’s likely tough for the country’s leaders to ignore the goldmi-I mean, nickel mine under their feet.

[Image: jafriyalbule via Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 21 comments
  • Lne937s Lne937s on Nov 29, 2022

    Chinese battery manufacturers like BYD and CATL are quickly transitioning to lower-cost LiFePO4 chemistry. That does away with the need for nickel and cobalt in batteries.


    But if people are really concerned, they can stop buying stainless steel appliances, as stainless steel alloys consume the majority of nickel. And avoid everything "chrome" plated, which has a thick plating of nickel and a very thin layer of chromium on the top.

  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Nov 30, 2022

    The problem lies with poor safety and environmental practices not the minerals or products being manufactured.

    • See 3 previous
    • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Nov 30, 2022

      @JeffS - my point is that you can ensure that any mining or manufacturing can be done in a clean and safe fashion. That costs money therefore reducing profits.


  • NotMyCircusNotMyMonkeys so many people here fellating musks fat sack, or hodling the baggies for TSLA. which are you?
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Canadians are able to win?
  • Doc423 More over-priced, unreliable garbage from Mini Cooper/BMW.
  • Tsarcasm Chevron Techron and Lubri-Moly Jectron are the only ones that have a lot of Polyether Amine (PEA) in them.
  • Tassos OK Corey. I went and saw the photos again. Besides the fins, one thing I did not like on one of the models (I bet it was the 59) was the windshield, which looked bent (although I would bet its designer thought it was so cool at the time). Besides the too loud fins. The 58 was better.
Next