Ford Wins Pikes Peak Despite Stopping on the Course

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

It turns out the Ford Performance F-150 Lightning SuperTruck was so bloody quick at Pikes Peak that it won the 102nd running of the hill climb despite coming to a dead stop along the route.

That’s the equivalent of being so far ahead in a race that you’ve enough time to pull into the pits and wash the car in preparation for victory lane (legend says that happened ages ago at the 24 Hours of Daytona, by the way).


Romain Dumas, whose name does not rhyme with an insult, stands as current king of the hill with a 7m57.148s under his Nomex belt from 2018 when he slingshotted up the hill in a Volkswagen I.D. R race car. This year’s effort with Ford netted a 8m53.553s though Dumas estimates a technical glitch which forced a shutdown and restart of the truck cost him about 26 seconds.


"I don't know what happened at the start, just the car switched off completely on its own, it never happened before," he told Pikes Peak's YouTube channel. Dumas went on to say the problem never happened in the two years of development and he knew how to potentially fix the problem thanks the lucky reading of a tech manual just hours prior to the race.


"By chance, I was reading all the procedures and I arrived to restart the car; so at this time I was quite happy that last night I was reading again what I should do in case of [an] issue!" There’s an endorsement for RTFM if we ever heard one.

Elsewhere, the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N TA Spec, driven by Hyundai World Rally driver Dani Sordo, finished the race in 9m30.852s which was a time sufficient to win the exhibition class. A second TA Spec car driven by hotshoe and all around good guy Randy Pobst finished the race in a speedy 9m55.551s. Not unlike the Nürburgring, anything under the ten minute mark is considered a blazingly quick run. Fun fact: Hyundai first competed in at Pikes Peak in 1992 when Rod Millen won the 2-Wheel Drive Showroom Stock division with a time of 13m21.17s behind the wheel of a Hyundai Scoupe.


The track was vastly different back in those days, with plenty of dirt presenting a wholly different challenge. Paving began early in the 2000s and the entire hill climb was licked with tarmac by the 2011 calendar year. This was undertaken thanks to a lawsuit against the City of Colorado Springs and National Forest Service brought by the Sierra Club alleging gravel pollution caused by the 13 unpaved miles of the Pikes Peak Highway violated the Clean Water Act.

[Images: Ford, Hyundai]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 17 comments
  • SCE to AUX That's a shame, but precisely none of these issues have anything to do with the electric drivetrain. Mfrs have chosen to cut costs by half-baking more controls into infotainment systems. Some don't do it very well. The recent story here about JD Power 90-day complaints covered this issue.
  • 28-Cars-Later They're to the point of *refunds*? Zoinks!
  • 28-Cars-Later This is probably worth messing with, the roof is the main variable. Not up on Saab but if this works anything like my C70 there is a manual roof collapse mechanism in the trunk or hidden behind the seat. Soft tops from what I have read were not meant to be kept permanently down but in the right climate you could probably just leave it down if used as a Sunday car (or mechanically raise/lower it as needed). All told if you could be in it for $5ish post roof repair, fluid changes, timing belt/water pump etc. I'd consider that a big win. Seller seems to have a newer Tech II attached in the pic so he may be knowledgeable on the car's needs and/or what's actually wrong with the roof. When mine broke, I had the same basic symptom and eventually the Volvo gods determined the mechanism which opened the rear roof storage compartment was snagged on one of the two rubber arms (car had a verified 39K miles at the time). I bought a roof door open motor from Volvo but had to source the rubber arm from a yard since it was NLA. May be something similar here, but it will likely involve taking the whole rear apart - still worth it IMO due to condition and miles.
  • Tassos This mutt's problem is not that it may lose this or that engine. It's a sports car whose styling SUCKS. It has no character, its styling does not emanate strength, speed, or even elegance. Toyota should pay some Italian studio to design a DECENT BODY for this POS.
  • Cprescott You all need to get a life. Once you "remove" a "base" engine and replace it with another engine, you still have a base engine. It is not like the vehicle comes without an engine and you have to pay to put one in.
Next