Abandoned History: Cadillac's Northstar V8, Head Bolts and Gaskets Aplenty (Part V)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

After a delayed and limited roll-out of the new Northstar engine (in two power configurations) for the 1993 and 1994 model year, Cadillac enjoyed a wave of positive press. With an entirely new product portfolio in place by 1994, the Northstar-filled (except Fleetwood Brougham) Cadillac lineup was ready to roll through the remainder of the Nineties. Cadillac immediately set about tweaking their V8 for 1995, and it was around that time some issues began to poke holes in the Northstar’s trophy collection.

The Seville STS was Cadillac’s flagship product when it debuted for the 1992 model year. It kicked off the award winning period for the brand. However, the ‘92 that won all those accolades was indeed the 4.9-liter equipped version, as Northstar was not ready until 1993. 


Even Cadillac’s own PR video (for Northstar) skipped over this little fact, and lumped the ‘92 STS in with the other Northstar awards. The “European sports sedan” class was where every OEM wanted to be at the time. Magazine comparison tests of the day pitched both larger and smaller sedans of type against one another; sometimes unfairly. Seville STS, Acura Legend, Nissan Maxima, Mercedes-Benz 190 and 300, Lexus ES, Lexus GS, Lincoln Continental, Jaguar XJ, BMW 5-Series, Infiniti Q45 and J30, Mazda Millenia, and Oldsmobile Aurora. Pick and mix as you please for comparison content.

With regard to the new Northstar Cadillacs, 1993 saw automotive awards from the likes of Autoweek, MotorWeek, Popular Science, Business Week, Automobile Magazine, Modern Metals Magazine, Consumer’s Digest, Robb Report, United Press International, Popular Mechanics, and even Rolling Stone. The awards ranged in scope from best engineering, top 10 of the American luxury segment, design awards, and comparison test wins. Rolling Stone gifted the STS its “Hot Car Award.” They don’t seem to rate cars anymore, though. 

The 1993 and 1994 Northstar engines were the “original” versions. As we covered in a previous entry, the magnesium intake manifold lasted through only the first year of engine production. Tricky construction with magnesium and the metal’s less than impressive durability properties were the reason Modern Metals Magazine saw fit to give an award to Northstar. Immediately replaced in 1994 with a plastic intake manifold, Cadillac engineers set about tweaking both versions of the Northstar for 1995.


The high-spec L37 received a bump in power for its 1995 usage, from 295 horses and 290 lb-ft of torque to an even 300 horses and 295 torques. In 1995 the L37 model list included the Eldorado ETC, Seville STS, and DeVille Concours. Allanté faded away after 1993, with a single-year Northstar offering among other cost-cutting efforts. Allanté deserves its own series, which will happen on these pages.

For base model Northstar vehicles equipped with the LD8 version, power increased in 1995 from 270 horses to 275, though torque remained at 300 lb-ft. The intent was to differentiate the LD8 as more focused on torque than the high-po L37. Whether drivers noticed those 5 total torques was debatable. 1995 models with the LD8 were the Eldorado ESC, Seville SLS, and DeVille.

It was around this time the earlier Northstar-equipped Cadillacs began to show issues. We’ll start with the lesser known one, coolant and oil seepage. According to an explanation on an ancient forum thread, the 1993 to 1999 Northstars had a problem with the integrity of their block castings due to the alloy used and casting methods. 


Specifically, as the block was made the molten aluminum splashed up the side of the casting, and then began to cool. The splashed aluminum cooled to the point that when the rest of the casting was filled with molten alloy, the cooler metal did not bond properly to the rest of the block. A fissure was created in this way, and allowed leakage. Oil and coolant would escape from early Northstar engines directly through the block. 

The broader and more visible issue a couple of years into Northstar were its various coolant loss issues, generally lumped together as “head gasket failures.” A misnomer in general, it was not the fault of the head gasket itself: The issue lay with the head bolts. Head bolts are long threaded bolts which attach the cylinder head to an engine’s block. 

In the case of the Northstar, the head bolts were threaded too finely, and lost their integrity with heat cycling and stress. This so-called “stretching” of the head bolts would cause them to strip the metal off the block as the threads pulled away. This resulted in a loss of cylinder pressure. Without cylinder pressure, coolant entered the cylinders, exhaust, and eventually the engine oil.


The loss of coolant caused the engines to overheat, which cooked the head gasket. While issues within the cylinders or exhaust were not always visible, a ruined head gasket led to milkshake-like brownish oil under the engine’s oil filler cap. The issues were then known generally as a head gasket failure, or the “Northstar Condition.” 


It could happen at any time, generally with miles between 50,000 and 100,000, and was more a when than an if condition. It didn’t matter how gently an early Northstar was treated, or how often it was serviced, it was going to fail eventually in this catastrophic way. Unfortunately for all involved, the fix for a failed Northstar was not a simple one. 

We’ll pick up with Northstar repair specs next time, and even take a little diversion into 4.9 land. It seems just as Cadillac stepped away from the 4.9 and went full problem-prone Northstar, it was hit with a slap in the face from the government. The old V8 had some secrets the brass at GM swept happily under the rug, and every single one of them would be sent back to a dealer service bay. Perfect time for an upsell to a new N* though, right?


[Images: GM]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 27 comments
  • Cprescott Cprescott on Jul 22, 2024

    As a whole, GM engineering since about the mid 1970's has been industry third rate and only got worse into the 1980's. That problem has not been solved yet and they've added automotive styling by the blind to add insult to injury.

    • Mike Beranek Mike Beranek on Jul 22, 2024

      The engineers are just fine- it's the accountants who erode the engineer's work until all that's left is crap.


  • InCogKneeToe InCogKneeToe on Jul 23, 2024

    I recall, 1996. My Boss offered to let me Shuttle his $48500MSRP 1996 Riviera Demo to Toronto to exchange it for a Low KM 1995 Eldorado ETC, $72,000 vaguely recall as the MSRP.

    It was a 1800km trip each way, and I remember thinking while driving the 3800 SC Riv, "What would make a Car worth $23K More?"

    That ETC was an Incredible Road Car! Especially the Northshore of Superior. Could have accumulated many speeding tickets.

    But as all Cadillac Engines at the time (other than the 307 Olds) it wound up with issues, and I bet the 3800 SC could still be running today.

    • See 1 previous
    • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Jul 25, 2024

      I wish they had tried a bit harder with the Riv's interior, particularly the dashboard design. It was unique to that model, so why not make it nice? No wood? COME ON! Also the build quality was terrible.




  • Miguel Perrito MADE SOME DECENT MONEY BUYING VWAGY AFTER THE CRASH! ONLY HAD TO HOLD FOR A COUPLE YEARS I THINK
  • Miguel Perrito MISSING JORTS AND A MAGA HAT... LOL
  • Dave M. I read this with a tear in my eye. My 2001 Trooper was one of my favorite vehicles; tall, excellent visuals, large capacity, and very comfortable seats. After 12 years and 250k miles it was semi-retired to vacation-use only, and then finally this past March donated to a local vocational high school. Still miss it!
  • 1995 SC It will be a 4 door crossover with a variable compression motor
  • Bd2 Hyundai Genesis is a fine alternative and has the 3.8L V6 which would later go on to power the legendary Telluride.
Next