Rare Rides Icons: The Toyota Cressida Story (Part I)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Our recent Rare Rides Icons coverage of the main quadrant of mid-Eighties Japanese family sedans ( Camry, Accord, Maxima, 626) brought another sedan to mind. Boxy and conservative, it was an upscale offering at a time when Japanese luxury brands simply did not exist. The sedan in question was popular enough for Nissan to target it directly with their Maxima. Presenting the Toyota Cressida, a comfortable luxury experience.

Through Toyota’s early years in North America, the company experimented with sales of larger models without much success. The “large” Toyopet Crown was imported in the late Fifties, and while Toyota considered it a full-size car, its tidy 168.7-inch length meant it was about 14 inches shorter than even a compact 1960 Chevrolet Corvair. Toyota took a few years off and brought back a Crown once more in 1965. By that time the model had grown size competitive with American compacts, as it added about 14 inches to its length.

But the Crown was always a slow seller on North American shores, and by 1973 Toyota dropped it to focus on the smaller Corona. Toyota had offered the Corona since the mid-Sixties, and it found a customer base in North America: Though it was small, it was more affordable than the Crown. The Corona expanded its reach in 1968 as the Corona Mark II appeared. Slightly larger and with more standard equipment than the standard Corona, North American customers found Corona Mark II an appealing midsize car.

With the divergence in Corona and Mark II, Toyota established separate paths for the two similar models. The Corona would see itself cut of content and continually made a cheaper car, while the Mark II moved further upmarket. By the Mark II’s second generation in 1973, it disassociated itself from the Corona by dropping its name in most markets. However, North America retained the full Corona Mark II name. Mark II grew larger in its second guise and had six-cylinder engines for the first time. Toyota wanted to compete more directly with upmarket Datsun models in North America: Its competitor launched the 610 in 1971, and sold their well-equipped renamed Nissan Bluebird as a “luxury Datsun.”

During the early Seventies oil crisis, cars like the 610 and Mark II were the only large-ish Japanese vehicles on sale in North America. They were suitable for buyers who’d grown tired of their domestic barges and desired better fuel economy but were not willing to buy a subcompact like the Honda Civic. Unlike Toyota’s smaller economy cars, Mark II offered a high level of standard equipment and an inline-six as its standard motivation. The goal was to show the customer they could have an efficient, reliable car without giving up the equipment they desired.

The final Mark IIs (X20) were available in North America for the 1976 model year, as Toyota took a one-year hiatus before it introduced its follow-up. The Mark II proved Toyota could sell a well-equipped larger car in the States, and the company was confident it could add even more content to its Mark II replacement. A new name was introduced for the 1978 model year, emblazoned on an all-new upscale car: Cressida.

In its home market, the Cressida was still called the Mark II, and the X30 version entered production late in 1976 for the 1977 model year. All examples of the third generation Mark II sent to North America were built at Toyota’s plant in Aichi. Secondary production for other markets took place in the Philippines, where the cars were assembled by Delta Motors Corporation. Part of the reason Toyota dropped the Mark II moniker in North America was due to the name’s common association with Lincoln.

As with most Japanese cars, Mark II grew larger in its transition to the Cressida. The wheelbase increased from 101.8 inches to 104.1″. Toyota was aware that luxury cars often had nice long overhangs, so the three-inch increase in wheelbase was accompanied by an 11-inch increase in overall length. The Mark II was 170.3 inches, while a Cressida was 181.7″; much more in line with what an American customer might expect in a family car. Cressida was still about 11 inches shorter than a Chevrolet Malibu, however. Other dimensions increased too, as width went from 64″ to 66.1 inches (five inches shy of the Malibu). Height gained about three inches for better headroom, up to 57.3 inches from 54.3″.

The Cressida sported entirely different looks than the Mark II. the outgoing car had a softer-looking front end with quad headlamps, flanked by a split grille that was filled with black horizontal slats. The front end came to a point, while a side character line headed downward toward the rear. The hood was mostly flat, and without much shape. The overall look was almost of a fastback sedan, with a vinyl roof that was cut clumsily around the chrome-ringed fuel door. The rear end was abrupt and largely vertical, with large lamp clusters. The overall look in any body style was a bit sporty for a luxury car, and most definitely Japanese.

Cressida was much more upright and more formal. The front end wore a mesh grille that was no longer separated, and it dazzled in chromed detailing. Headlamps were circular and ringed in chrome, with inset squared off driving lamps that had their own chrome boxes. Cressida’s hood was sculpted around the grille, and fenders curved around to match the shape of the headlamps. An untrimmed side body line still flowed down toward the rear, but it wasn’t as fast an angle and didn’t continue past the rear door. The bodyside trim was lower down and horizontal like a traditional luxury car. Wheel arches were newly chromed, and sporty-looking wheel covers on the Mark II were replaced by chromed discs on the Cressida.

The Cressida’s rear end was more square and upright and matched the more upright greenhouse. Said greenhouse was no longer covered by clumsy vinyl and featured chrome window trim and chrome B-pillars. Rear lenses became smaller, simpler, and more conservative as the Cressida did a 180 from any notion of sportiness. Its appearance, while more conservative, was also less Japanese. The front end reflected European styling influences, particularly from Jaguar.

Body formats for the new Mark II were carried over from the prior model and consisted of a two-door coupe, and a four-door sedan and wagon. Toyota chose not to import the personal luxury Cressida coupe to North America (that’s what the Celica Supra was for) but did offer in-fashion wood paneling on the wagon. In many markets, a variety of inline-four engines were available, as small as 1.8 liters on base models, and through to 2.0 liters. There were two different inline-six engines from Toyota’s M family, a standard 2.0-liter M, or the 2.6-liter 4M and sibling the 4M-E. The E signified cars with electronic fuel injection, a system sourced from the more expensive Crown. A single diesel arrived for the Mark II in 1979, a 2.2-liter inline-four.

Once again, all Cressidas exported to North America used an inline-six. The 4M was the only available engine at introduction, and in its carbureted format managed 123 horsepower. The 4M-E arrived for 1979 and showed up with less power: 110 horses. Not especially sophisticated, the engine had single overhead cams and two valves per cylinder. Cressida was the first Toyota in North America to have fuel injection. The Cressida’s transmission was most often a four-speed automatic, but there was a five-speed manual available.

As it was the largest Toyota on sale in North America and a luxury model, the Cressida didn’t come cheap. In 1979 it asked $8,279 ($34,079 adj.) before options, at a time when a Corolla was $4,253 ($17,506 adj.). For that money, buyers received a standard automatic transmission, power steering, stereo with cassette, a rear defroster, and air conditioning.

The first Cressida proved to be a short-lived model, an experiment with Euro-influenced brougham styling that saw a reversion back to a very Japanese look in short order. Cressida was available for just three model years in its initial shape before Toyota ushered in its successor. It was time for a larger Cressida with more power and much more technology. More on that next time.

[Images: Toyota]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • DungBeetle62 DungBeetle62 on Mar 01, 2022

    I'm also awaiting the next chapter. That one intersected with a bizarre instance of my Dad ending up with a blue early-80s Cressida as a company car after abysmal of-the-era artifacts as a 4-door Cutlass whose Catalytic Converter farted sulfur on any less-than-gentle stop and the white full-sized LTD wagon "with the horn on the turn signal stalk". I'm sure the seeds were planted there for him going full-Lexus in the late 1990s. Its tenure was just THAT much before I was allowed behind the wheel.

  • CrystalEyes CrystalEyes on Mar 02, 2022

    "...the lost Lamborghinis will require the company to resume production of the V12 Aventador..." Why? Can't they just issue some refunds and call it a day? Or offer to substitute one of their other products?

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
Next