Sacrilicious: Chevrolet Builds Bolt-powered K5 Blazer for SEMA

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Chevrolet plans on showcasing a 1977 K5 Blazer converted over to all-electric propulsion for SEMA360, foreshadowing the Electric Connect and Cruise package General Motors hopes on selling in the latter of 2021. But it would first like to take the public’s temperature on the concept by surveying SEMA attendees interested in building their own electric projects before finalizing its “eCrate” offering.

That makes the modified Chevrolet Blazer-E a proof of concept to help customers realize what kind of projects might be possible and get the creative juices flowing — something which never seems to carry over when it comes to naming EVs.

GM has been doing the electric conversion concepts for a while now and noted that the 2018 Chevrolet eCOPO Camaro and 2019 E-10 pickup helped the manufacturer decide how best to tackle its Blazer project. Chevy decided to keep as much of the SUV stock and attempted to make any swapped components hassle-free, adding that 90 percent of the new parts installed for the eCrate package came directly factory components used on the Chevrolet Bolt.

From GM:

To convert the 1977 K5 Blazer, the team first removed from the Blazer the original 175-horsepower 400 cubic-inch V-8, three-speed automatic, fuel system and exhaust. Then, the team installed a Bolt EV electric motor, delivering 200 horsepower and 266 lb-ft of torque, paired with a Chevrolet Performance electronically controlled four-speed automatic. The rest of the Blazer drivetrain remains untouched, including the transfer case, driveshaft and axles.

Power is supplied by a 400-volt Bolt EV battery pack with 60 kilowatt-hours of usable energy installed in the cargo area. Using production controllers and wiring harnesses preserves many Bolt EV features, including shock protection, battery heating and cooling, battery-overcharge protection and even regenerative braking.

Excuse the editorializing, but this is exactly the kind of thing that had me geeked about EVs in the first place. Most electrically powered vehicles haven’t spoken to me (with a handful of exceptions). But the possibility of installing an e-powertrain into a vintage and otherwise-normal-looking automobile is genuinely intriguing. Imagine chucking a pair of torque-rich electric motors into a 1992 Mitsubishi Mirage and living in a sleeper’s paradise.

It’s easy to see where Chevy’s going with this and it’s nice to see them keeping things simple, even if it probably had a lot to do with the pandemic keeping everyone away from whatever garage they used to piece the Blazer-E (again, awful name) together.

Additional aftermarket components are said to include an electric power steering kit, electric pump providing vacuum to the stock brake system, and an electronic controller to drive inputs to the vintage Blazer gauges (allowing the original fuel meter to display the SUV’s current state of charge). Understated and slick but it’s all in service of Chevrolet Performance hawking the eCrate.

As of now, the plan involves certifying as many service centers and aftermarket companies to install the system and selling them the necessary tools. Afterward, they’ll be eligible to install the initial eCrate offering — which includes a 60-kWh battery pack, 200-hp electric motor, wiring harnesses, cooling pumps, and the obligatory DC-to-AC power inverter and converter.

Assuming it’s a success, Chevy said it would entertain the possibility of a “wider range of aftermarket applications” that included performance-focused applications and larger battery packs.

SEMA has gone virtual this year to keep people from coughing near each other. But GM said customers could follow all the action on the Chevrolet Performance YouTube page, which currently features a glut of electric conversions and LS swaps.

[Images: General Motors]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 43 comments
  • Flipper35 Flipper35 on Nov 02, 2020

    I hope the battery pack comes in different shapes. A Bugeye would be a hoot with this drivetrain, but with that battery pack shape I am sure it wouldn't fit. Same with a mid-70s Corvette or other old sports car. If they can't make it modular or the shape of an 18 gallon tank, there are many things this won't work in.

    • Brett Woods Brett Woods on Nov 03, 2020

      Battery pack bolt up gas tank replacement? I am liking your idea. Maybe 25 miles range. Might be good for shopping if you’re retired. Take out the widow next door. Johnny your truck is so quiet and creaky. Hail to the king baby.

  • 285exp 285exp on Nov 03, 2020

    Seems like an interesting, if fairly useless, conversion. You have a big old truck with a battery the size of a standard Model 3, tires with much greater rolling resistance than the Tesla’s, greater drivetrain losses because it still has a conventional auto transmission, and the aerodynamics of a barn. What a deal.

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next