2025 Mini Cooper S Hardtop Revealed in NYC

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Mini has released the 2025 Mini Cooper Hardtop, specifically the performance variant that’s likely to appeal to enthusiasts that aren’t interested in the hardcore John Cooper Works version. The manufacturer is reviewing the model at the New York auto show this week and looks to have kept the car that’s slated for sale in North America quite close to its European counterpart — with a few exceptions.


While the S variant will share the same turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine as the base unit, Mini is only sharing comprehensive specifications of the former. The 2025 Mini Cooper S hatchback will offer 201 horsepower and 221 pound-feet of torque. Those are relatively modest power increases from its predecessor but likely to be noticeable if the car manages to keep its weight down. Regardless, the company said 60 mph should be available in about 6.3 seconds.

Still front-wheel drive, the model will feature a seven-speed automatic transmission with no possibility to option a manual on our market. Mini probably assumed it wasn’t worth the trouble after considering prospective sales. But it’s something that’s going to annoy a subset of Cooper enthusiasts bent on maximizing driving engagement.


We’re running out of sporting vehicles that are focused on minimizing weight as a strategy for improving importance. However, finding companies that are willing to retain manual transmissions (especially on models sold in North America) is even more difficult. If Mini is willing to do either, it’s already going above what most brands are willing to do for people that enjoy spirited driving.

Then again, we’re likewise seeing the Cooper hatchback adopting modern cues that haven’t really resonated with anyone. The cabin has gone minimalist, with the center touchscreen doing most of the heavy lifting in terms of both display and vehicle controls. The design harkens back to the original model while also adopting the latest trends automakers are using to save on production costs and hurrang drivers into interfacing with touch-based operating systems.


It doesn’t look bad and the initial reviews seem to indicate that the European model is easy enough to work. Build quality is also said to be excellent. But interior space remains lackluster, with the backseat really only working for extremely young children. Euro models have also shown the 2-door hatchback to offer a scant 7.45 cubic feet of trunk space. The four-door model is said to be better with nearly 9.7 cubic feet of space — or about what you’d get from a Fiat 500.

While there’s definitely room to gripe about how the model is packaged, especially considering the model is going to be almost 4 inches longer and 2 inches wider than its predecessor, it’s still a relatively small automobile. Mini likewise seems to have selected a New York debut to drive home the point that the Cooper is primarily intended for city use.


“Much like the dramatic presence of New York’s titanic skyscrapers on the compact island of Manhattan, the MINI Cooper S is power and poise in a small, space efficient package.” said Mike Peyton, Vice President of MINI of the Americas. “Seeing the new, MINI Cooper S having fun on the streets of New York is a testament to MINI as a small, fun-to-drive car with a big heart.”

The vehicle’s personality is something we won’t know until it has been tested. However, it seems like the company isn’t interested in straying too far from the original recipe.


Mini said it would drop details about the base model later this year. The convertible and higher-performance JCW models are also supposed to debut by this October. Meanwhile the hatchbacks are supposed to go on sale in September. The base is supposed to start at $29,945 and the S variant is supposed to begin at $33,195 — both of which are three grand more than their outgoing counterparts.

[Images: Mini]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • Tassos Jong-iL Tassos Jong-iL on Mar 27, 2024

    This would be very suitable in the countryside of North Korea.

  • Ted Ted on Mar 28, 2024

    “the model is going to be almost 4 inches longer and 2 inches wider than its predecessor”


    Size matters. In this case there is 6” too much.

  • 2ACL I have a soft spot for high-performance, shark-nosed Lancers (I considered the less-potent Ralliart during the period in which I eventually selected my first TL SH-AWD), but it's can be challenging to find a specimen that doesn't exhibit signs of abuse, and while most of the components are sufficiently universal in their function to service without manufacturer support, the SST isn't one of them. The shops that specialize in it are familiar with the failure as described by the seller and thus might be able to fix this one at a substantial savings to replacement. There's only a handful of them in the nation, however. A salvaged unit is another option, but the usual risks are magnified by similar logistical challenges to trying to save the original.I hope this is a case of the seller overvaluing the Evo market rather than still owing or having put the mods on credit. Because the best offer won't be anywhere near the current listing.
  • Peter Buying an EV from Toyota is like buying a Bible from Donald Trump. Don’t be surprised if some very important parts are left out.
  • Sheila I have a 2016 Kia Sorento that just threw a rod out of the engine case. Filed a claim for new engine and was denied…..due to a loop hole that was included in the Class Action Engine Settlement so Hyundai and Kia would be able to deny a large percentage of cars with prematurely failed engines. It’s called the KSDS Improvement Campaign. Ever hear of such a thing? It’s not even a Recall, although they know these engines are very dangerous. As unknowing consumers load themselves and kids in them everyday. Are their any new Class Action Lawsuits that anyone knows of?
  • Alan Well, it will take 30 years to fix Nissan up after the Renault Alliance reduced Nissan to a paltry mess.I think Nissan will eventually improve.
  • Alan This will be overpriced for what it offers.I think the "Western" auto manufacturers rip off the consumer with the Thai and Chinese made vehicles.A Chinese made Model 3 in Australia is over $70k AUD(for 1995 $45k USD) which is far more expensive than a similar Chinesium EV of equal or better quality and loaded with goodies.Chinese pickups are $20k to $30k cheaper than Thai built pickups from Ford and the Japanese brands. Who's ripping who off?
Next