Auto Tariffs Off the Table for 180 Days, Trump Claims

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

U.S. President Donald Trump pushed the threat of tariffs on imported vehicles to the background on Friday, announcing a 180-day pause as the country negotiates trade agreements with Japan and the European Union.

The delay comes a day ahead of a Saturday deadline imposed by the Commerce Department. In February, the department delivered the findings of an investigation on whether auto imports represent a national security threat to the United States. The report, not seen by the public, issued recommendations to the White House.

Trump has long used the threat of import tariffs to bring trading partners to the table, especially the EU. The region fired back with threats of its own. With negotiations underway, Trump is allowed to push back the decision to impose tariffs by six months, though he can still choose to impose them at any time.

The president said Friday that he directed U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer to secure agreements “to address the threatened impairment” of national security by incoming foreign vehicles.

“United States defense and military superiority depend on the competitiveness of our automobile industry and the research and development that industry generates,” said White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders in a statement reported by CNBC. “The negotiation process will be led by United States Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and, if agreements are not reached within 180 days, the President will determine whether and what further action needs to be taken.”

Trump said his aim is to improve the “domestic conditions of competition” by reducing imports. Ideally, he’d love to see every vehicle sold in the U.S. built in the U.S., though that dream scenario isn’t in the cards.

Numerous automakers have come out against the idea of import tariffs, among them General Motors, Toyota, and Volkswagen. Each warns of higher consumer prices if such a move comes to pass.

As the country’s trade focus turns to automobiles, food and clothing companies warn that last week’s raising of tariffs on $200 billion in Chinese goods (from 10 percent to 25 percent) also stands to hit American consumers in the wallet. As reported by Reuters, Del Monte, Walmart, and Macy’s have publicly stated that the tariffs will have an impact on their business, suggesting the added costs could be passed on to consumers.

[Image: BMW]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 32 comments
  • Redapple2 I gave up on Honda. My 09 Accord Vs my 03. The 09s- V 6 had a slight shudder when deactivating cylinders. And the 09 did not have the 03 's electro luminescent gages. And the 09 had the most uncomfortable seats. My brother bought his 3rd and last Honda CRV. Brutal seats after 25 minutes. NOW, We are forever Toyota, Lexus, Subaru people now despite HAVING ACCESS TO gm EMPLOYEE DISCOUNT. Despite having access to the gm employee discount. Man, that is a massive statement. Wow that s bad - Under no circumstances will I have that govna crap.
  • Redapple2 Front tag obscured. Rear tag - clear and sharp. Huh?
  • Redapple2 I can state what NOT to buy. HK. High theft. Insurance. Unrefined NVH. Rapidly degrading interiors. HK? No way !
  • Luke42 Serious answer:Now that I DD an EV, buying an EV to replace my wife’s Honda Civic is in the queue. My wife likes her Honda, she likes Apple CarPlay, and she can’t stand Elon Musk - so Tesla starts the competition with two demerit-points and Honda starts the competition with one merit-point.The Honda Prologue looked like a great candidate until Honda announced that the partnership with GM was a one-off thing and that their future EVs would be designed in-house.Now I’m more inclined toward the Blazer EV, the vehicle on which the Prologue is based. The Blazer EV and the Ultium platform won’t be orphaned by GM any time soon. But then I have to convince my wife she would like it better than her Honda Civic, and that’s a heavy lift because she doesn’t have any reason to be dissatisfied with her current car (I take care of all of the ICE-hassles for her).Since my wife’s Honda Civic is holding up well, since she likes the car, and since I take care of most of the drawbacks of drawbacks of ICE ownership for her, there’s no urgency to replace this vehicle.Honestly, if a paid-off Honda Civic is my wife’s automotive hill to die on, that’s a pretty good place to be - even though I personally have to continue dealing the hassles and expenses of ICE ownership on her behalf.My plan is simply to wait-and-see what Honda does next. Maybe they’ll introduce the perfect EV for her one day, and I’ll just go buy it.
  • 2ACL I have a soft spot for high-performance, shark-nosed Lancers (I considered the less-potent Ralliart during the period in which I eventually selected my first TL SH-AWD), but it's can be challenging to find a specimen that doesn't exhibit signs of abuse, and while most of the components are sufficiently universal in their function to service without manufacturer support, the SST isn't one of them. The shops that specialize in it are familiar with the failure as described by the seller and thus might be able to fix this one at a substantial savings to replacement. There's only a handful of them in the nation, however. A salvaged unit is another option, but the usual risks are magnified by similar logistical challenges to trying to save the original.I hope this is a case of the seller overvaluing the Evo market rather than still owing or having put the mods on credit. Because the best offer won't be anywhere near the current listing.
Next