Lexus' LC Convertible 'Concept' Is More Like a Halo in Waiting

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Late last year, Toyota Motor North America CEO Jim Lentz suggested the automaker, after taking stock of its inventory, might cut some struggling product from its store shelves. It now seems on the verge of adding a new one.

Bound for a Detroit debut, the company’s Lexus LC Convertible Concept is not a way-out pipe dream unveiled by an automaker hoping to generate buzz with an inch-deep piece of vaporware. Instead, it is simply the division’s high-zoot LC coupe, sans roof. And all of the wording surrounding the car screams that production is nearly inevitable — so long as the public responds favorably.

Toyota says the drop-top Lexus suggests the “future direction” of its flagship car, providing a detailed list of specifications to underscore what the concept has to offer (length grows by four-tenths of an inch, and that’s about it). An accompanying video superimposes phrases like “Too powerful to ignore” over seductive angles of the vehicle’s body and innards. Yes, the vestigial rear seat remains.

The company’s intentions aren’t subtle. Toyota even goes as far as calling it an “aspirational halo vehicle,” all but shouting that it wants buyers interested in a high-end drop-top that doesn’t hail from Germany.

Available in LC 500 and LC 500h hybrid form, the LC line starts at $93,225 (after delivery) for a coupe boasting 471 horsepower from its 5.0-liter V8, with power routed to the rear wheels through a 10-speed automatic transmission. Springing for the hybrid drops horsepower and raises the price. Entry price for the hybrid’s 354 hp and odd multi-stage tranny is $97,735, and it’s easy to see a convertible LC retailing for over $100k to start.

While Lentz’s November comments hinted at a product cull, his words can be interpreted as Toyota seeking to put extra effort behind certain models. “We are taking a hard look at all of the segments that we compete in to make sure we are competing in profitable segments and that products we sell have strategic value,” Lentz said.

As a high-tech, high-priced flagship, the LC has strategic value. It’s the company’s only grand tourer and, in this form, it would be the company’s only convertible.

Lexus needs a new reason for buyers to check out, and maybe slide into, its slinky two-door. Despite going on sale in early 2017, last year’s sales fell 20 percent below that of its first, truncated year on the market. Lexus moved 1,979 LCs in 2018 compared to 2017’s 2,487, and December’s sales show a 48 percent year-over-year decline. Is the LC in trouble? That depends on the brand’s expectations for the model, but falling sales and the appearance of this “concept” points to dissatisfaction among company brass.

If the automaker doesn’t built this convertible, one wonders what that means for the model’s future.

[Image: Toyota]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 15 comments
  • El scotto They should be supping with a very, very long spoon.
  • El scotto [list=1][*]Please make an EV that's not butt-ugly. Not Jaguar gorgeous but Buick handsome will do.[/*][*] For all the golf cart dudes: A Tesla S in Plaid mode will be the fastest ride you'll ever take.[/*][*]We have actual EV owners posting on here. Just calmly stated facts and real world experience. This always seems to bring out those who would argue math.[/*][/list=1]For some people an EV will never do, too far out in the country, taking trips where an EV will need recharged, etc. If you own a home and can charge overnight an EV makes perfect sense. You're refueling while you're sleeping.My condo association is allowing owners to install chargers. You have to pay all of the owners of the parking spaces the new electric service will cross. Suggested fee is 100$ and the one getting a charger pays all the legal and filing fees. I held out for a bottle of 30 year old single malt.Perhaps high end apartments will feature reserved parking spaces with chargers in the future. Until then non home owners are relying on public charge and one of my neighbors is in IT and he charges at work. It's call a perk.I don't see company owned delivery vehicles that are EV's. The USPS and the smiley boxes should be the 1st to do this. Nor are any of our mega car dealerships doing this and but of course advertising this fact.I think a great many of the EV haters haven't came to the self-actualization that no one really cares what you drive. I can respect and appreciate what you drive but if I was pushed to answer, no I really don't care what you drive. Before everyone goes into umbrage over my last sentence, I still like cars. Especially yours.I have heated tiles in my bathroom and my kitchen. The two places you're most likely to be barefoot. An EV may fall into to the one less thing to mess with for many people.Macallan for those who were wondering.
  • EBFlex The way things look in the next 5-10 years no. There are no breakthroughs in battery technology coming, the charging infrastructure is essentially nonexistent, and the price of entry is still way too high.As soon as an EV can meet the bar set by ICE in range, refueling times, and price it will take off.
  • Jalop1991 Way to bury the lead. "Toyota to offer two EVs in the states"!
  • Jalop1991 I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
Next