AAA: There's Too Many Driver Assistance Tech Names

by Matt Posky

Published: January 31st, 2019

aaa there s too many driver assistance tech names

If you read this website regularly, browse automobiles online, or have taken a trip to the dealership within the last couple of years, you’ve probably noticed the countless names applied to driver assistance systems appearing in new cars. It’s the result of automakers wanting proprietary names for these features that they think sound catchy.

Not everyone is a fan. The American Automobile Association (AAA) doesn’t feel that “having twenty unique names for adaptive cruise control and nineteen different names for lane keeping assistance” helps consumers make informed decisions.

According to its own research, AAA claims that advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) were available on 92.7 percent of new vehicles on sale in the United States as of May 2018. That makes them next to impossible for consumers to avoid. Thus, the motor club group feels it’s time for automakers to standardize their naming strategies — if for no other reason than to help preserve our sanity.

In a study published earlier this month, AAA attempted to break down just how extensive this issue has become. It isn’t just the number of names being thrown around, it’s also the terms used by various brands to describe it.

For example, you might find adaptive cruise control under its most common name, but you also might hear it called Smart Cruise Control, Intelligent Cruise Control, Adaptive Cruise Control with Queue Assist, Dynamic Radar Cruise Control, Distronic Plus, Traffic-Aware Cruise Control, or something else cooked up by a marketing team.

Worse still is that regulatory bodies and automotive standards organizations such as the NHTSA and SAE even have their own unique terms for some of these technologies. AAA says all this naming inconsistency is basically a monumental disservice to all parties involved, and should be changed.

From AAA:

The intent of this paper is to create a dialog with the automotive industry, safety organizations and legislators about the need for common naming for advanced driver assistance systems. Within this report, AAA is proposing a set of standardized technology names for use in describing advanced safety systems. AAA acknowledges that this is a dynamic environment, and that further input from stakeholders and consumer research will further refine this recommendation.

In establishing a conversation within the industry to strive for a common goal, AAA doesn’t want any dilly-dallying. Based on research data ending in May of 2018, automatic emergency braking was standard on 30.6 percent of all new models, lane keeping assistance reached 13.9 percent, and adaptive cruise control on 11.8 percent. Those numbers shoot up dramatically when you incorporate optional equipment.

Additionally, prices for these features are starting to drop. Twenty automakers have already promised to make systems like automatic emergency braking standard across their product lines by 2022 — “suggesting increasing prevalence of the technologies in the future,” according to AAA.

A large part of the problem is the speed of the technology’s proliferation. Regulatory bodies are having difficulty keeping up and aren’t using consistent naming strategies, either. For example, the NHTSA has used at least three different technology names for automatic emergency braking, including “Dynamic Brake System” and “Collision Imminent Braking.”

Granted, not all of these technologies incorporate the same hardware of function identically. But they share common objectives, which AAA thinks should be enough to bind them under a single name.

Honestly, we don’t mind a few rogue names for certain technologies, but there really are too many to contend with right now. Looking through the 34 brands sold in the United States, AAA found that automakers use twenty different names for adaptive cruise control, nineteen for lane keeping assist, nineteen for blind sport warning, eighteen for automatic high beams, fourteen for rear cross traffic warnings, and twelve for parking assist.

There are also ADAS packages that bundle a lot of this technology together. But these also use proprietary names. For example, Ford has a “Safe and Smart Package,” Mazda has “i-ACTIVSENSE,” and Tesla has “Enhanced Autopilot.” While a relatively small sample taken from the industry, they’re indicative of the whole. None of these packages offer the same number of features and their names don’t actually indicate what they might entail.

While AAA claims automakers can totally reserve the right to choose their own system and package names, it offered up a list of proposed terms it would like to see become standard, urging automakers to at least incorporate them into manuals and window stickers. It also provides a list of proposed terms for the industry to mull over.

You can read the full study here if you’re curious about AAA’s recommended naming strategy, or if you just want to how many different monikers automakers use for the various ADAS technologies.

[Image: Mazda]

#AAA #ADAS #AdvanceAutomotiveTechnologies #AdvancedDriverAssistanceSystems #AmericanAutomobileAssociation #AutomotiveIndustry #AutomotiveTechnologies #NamingStrategies #Reports #Safety #Studies #SafetySystems

Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 14 comments

EBFlex on Jan 31, 2019

"AAA: There’s Too Much Driver Assistance Tech" Fixed

Like Reply
- Lie2me on Jan 31, 2019
  
  I'm in AA because my car had too much AAA
  
  Like
Tele Vision on Jan 31, 2019

My car has DVD navigation - that I've never used. It also has a lapsed OnStar thing - that I've never used. My truck has satellite radio - that I've never used. Both cars have old-bones Cruise Control - that I've never used, in either of them. Strangely, I've never had a crash, or even a fender-bender, in 32 years of driving. I did get a speeding ticket back in 1986 that would get me three years in the electric chair ( on 'sizzle' ) these days, but I paid it. I don't think that any of this technology would have prevented that, anyway.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.