Whoops: Ford Pulls 2019 Ranger Build and Price Tool From Website, Claims It Made a Mistake

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It seemed like Ford Motor Company had answered prayers Tuesday, after an online configurator for the 2019 Ranger pickup finally appeared on the automaker’s consumer website. But, just as quickly as it appeared, Ford pulled it down. Apparently someone goofed up.

A company spokesman told Jalopnik that the posting “was a mistake,” adding that, “the pricing shown is inaccurate.” The build and price tool, the spokesman said, will appear next week.

It’s true that the configurator showed a regular cab selection, but clicking it only took you to the extended SuperCab bodystyle. A fleet or overseas option, maybe? We have to wonder just how different the actual pricing will be compared to what we just saw. So, for the sake of future comparison, here’s what Ford’s now-disappeared site told us (or didn’t) about the 2019 Ranger:

(Note: the following text was about to go live when we learned of Ford’s alleged mistake. Keep in mind that what you read may be completely inaccurate. Time will tell.)

Starting at $24,000 (plus a $1,095 destination fee) for a rear-drive, SuperCab XL model, would-be buyers will find that getting into a Ranger could easily set them back more than $40k, once they reach their desired configuration.

As you’d expect, the base XL is a total stripper, with the only appeal being the model’s newness (to this market, anyway), as well as its 2.3-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder and 10-speed automatic transmission. While Ford hasn’t revealed the truck’s power specs, that same engine makes up to 310 horsepower and 350 lb-ft of torque in other applications. Engine stop-start comes standard.

Anyway, cloth buckets, 16-inch silver steel wheels, and AM/FM stereo rounds out the highlights on this model. Vinyl buckets are available at no extra charge but actual niceties (sliding rear window, power mirrors, cruise control, SYNC, backup camera) will cost you extra. Strangely, the configurator added $300 of unspecified “options” that can’t be erased from the base XL shortly after I started playing with the tool. Base MSRP remains at $24,000, though — over a grand less than the entry-level Toyota Tacoma SR, but four grand more than a less-powerful base Chevrolet Colorado.

Adding capacity, the SuperCrew XL 4×2 rings in at $27,615 after destination, the 4×4 SuperCab stickers for $29,555, and a four-wheel-drive four-door XL tips the financial scales at $31,785. Should the interior prove too spartan, fun things purchased at yard sales can be carted back home in the Ranger’s six- or five-foot box.

Only two vibrant colors exists outside of the XL greyscale, and that’s Lightning Blue and Saber (orange-copper). Alright, onward we go towards volume models with family appeal.

Stepping up to the far more appealing XLT trim, the Ranger dons 17-inch painted aluminum wheels, SYNC, Co-Pilot 360 driver assist features, and two shades of premium cloth. For a 4×2 Supercab, the XLT’s price floor starts at $29,035 after destination. Luxury and technology packages (chrome and towing, too) join a laundry list of options. Still no standard sliding rear window, though, but you’ll be able to add Hot Pepper Red to your paint palette.

As most buyers will gravitate towards a full backseat, the SuperCrew XLT stands to be popular. That model carries a $31,210 price tag, or $35,210 in 4×4 CrewCab guise. Should you choose to check almost every options box available, while forgoing the FX4 package, you’ll be staring down the barrel of a $41,855 after-delivery price tag.

But there’s also the Lariat trim to consider. This snazzy model starts at $33,305 in 4×2 SuperCab clothing, but, as no one would purchase a high-zoot truck in such a configuration, let’s look at our other options. A Lariat 4×2 SuperCrew stickers for $35,480, bringing the trim’s standard leather, SYNC3, push-button ignition, and LED headlamps aboard for the whole family to enjoy. Adding four-wheel drive brings the Monroney to $39,480.

There’s also sport, chrome, and tow packages, should you desire it, as well as White Platinum paint for an extra $595. Outfitting our Lariat with every option — bedliner, technology and sport packages, running boards, etc — brought the price to over $46,000, which would then require tax and admin. Pushing $50k, for sure, but it would be an odd duck who’d choose this configuration over an F-150.

Our own Adam Tonge, who’s waited patiently for the configurator to go live, provided this image as the reason for his newfound Ranger distrust:

There’ll be plenty of food for thought waiting for Ford truck buyers once the Ranger goes on sale this fall.

[Images: Ford Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 49 comments
  • Micko4472 Micko4472 on Aug 07, 2018

    Well, if you think the Ranger is too expensive, may I recommend a Nissan Frontier. For about $33k srp, you can get a very nice truck. For a few grand more, you can get the offroad version, which is pretty decent even if it won't run the Rubicon Trail. Yes, I know, Nissan does not have all the electronica, but you don't really need it anyway.

    • Syncro87 Syncro87 on Aug 09, 2018

      The Frontier is pretty dated. The interior feels like it is from a late nineties Geo. MPG is sketchy. Second row space utilization in the crew cab is just short of dismal. I can see the appeal, I guess, from a certain standpoint. The things are probably reliable, and you'll likely have a great supply of salvage yard parts for years due to them making the things for so long. It would be hard for me to shell out thirty grand for something so past the sell by date, though. Maybe I'm not as wealthy as the average TTACer, but 30-35 grand is a decent chunk of change for me, so there better be some surprise and delight, so to speak for that amount of money. The Frontier offers little of either.

  • Road_pizza Road_pizza on Aug 10, 2018

    Not concerned with pricing as I can get either A or D Plan pricing, and will be ordering an XLT Supercab probably in February. Can't wait!

  • KOKing Kinda hate to say this but they need to be an American Land Rover sans the offroad image (and capability). Leave the Escalade alone and do a shrunken Escalade-esque lineup (the first time I saw a Hyundai Palisade I thought that was the XT6 that Cadillac shoulda made) and dump the alphabet soup models and trims.
  • Theflyersfan How to fix Cadillac? Blackwing.Now I know (because I've asked) dealers are still thinking they are selling Demons with the kinds of markups on Blackwings, but for enthusiast drivers in the know, those cars are legit. They get lost in the shuffle of M-this and AMG-that, but they hold their own. However, with rising CAFE standards and upcoming emissions requirements, along with European CO2 limits, they all can't be turbo V8s with no hybrid propulsion. So at least mild hybrid them to try to eke out another 8-10 mpg average. That's a good start. Do something with the Escalade. These aren't the early 2000s when they had the hip hop image and every corner had a jet black Escalade with chrome rims. In my area, you just don't see them any longer as money has moved to the Germans. If they want to compete with the Germans, they have to downsize it and crank the engine up to 11. It's still way too truckish to compete with the Q8, X7, and GLS. Even though they probably don't want to, keep the sedans. Don't give those up to the Germans, Japanese, and Koreans as well. And with all that, go all in with performance. Become what BMW was over 15 years ago. They tried that before and half assed it, but they have the tools to make it happen now. Try to appeal to the audience that BMW and Mercedes left behind and that Genesis and Acura are trying to claim (or reclaim). Good luck Cadillac...you'll need it.
  • SCE to AUX Introduce a modern V-16 and put it into a Celestiq-like vehicle instead of electric.
  • DungBeetle62 For where we're at in the product cycle, I think there are bigger changes afoot. With this generation debuting in 2018, and the Avalon gone, is the next ES to be Crown based? That'll be an interesting aesthetic leap.
  • Philip Precht When Cadillac stopped building luxury cars, with luxury looks, that is when they started their downward spiral. Now, they just look like Chevrolet knock-offs, not much luxury, no luxurious looks. Interiors are just generic. Nothing what they used to look like. Why should someone spend $80,000 on a Cadillac when they can spend a LOT less and get a comparable looking Chevrolet????
Next