Detroit's October 2017 Sales: Ford Soars, Fiat Chrysler Hits the Brakes

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

If the Detroit Three want to keep wind in their sales sails, it sure won’t happen on the strength of traditional passenger cars.

Several brands from Ford Motor Company, General Motors, and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles posted U.S. sales declines in October 2017, all thanks to the slipping popularity of regular cars. In many cases, the continued strength of the crossover/SUV/truck market wasn’t enough to tip the scales back in the automakers’ favor.

Let’s start off at the top, because that’s where Ford Motor Company sits. The company’s Blue Oval brand recorded an October U.S. sales increase of 6.6 percent, year-over-year, though the same can’t be said for the Lincoln brand — the premium division’s sales sunk 1.8 percent compared to the same month last year. (Year-to-date sales are reversed, with Ford down 2.2 percent compared to 2016 and Lincoln still beating last year’s tally by 2.4 percent.)

So, where is the volume coming from?

Do you even have to guess? Overall FoMoCo car volume sunk 2.4 percent in October compared to a year prior, but SUV sales rose 5.3 percent. With a refreshed Ford F-150 and revamped Super Duty out for 2018, Ford truck sales shot up 11.4 percent.

Breaking it down even further, the pattern remains crystal clear. Fusion sales are down 6.2 percent, year-over-year, with sales over the first 10 months of 2017 dipping 22.6 percent from last year. The Taurus sank 5.4 percent in October. One bright spot is the Focus, which recorded a 7.8 percent increase. Still, this year’s Focus sales remain 10.4 percent lower than last year’s.

Lincoln saw its MKZ and Continental sedans record year-over-year drops 10.9 and 18.5 percent, respectively, in October. Meanwhile, Navigator sales rose 9.7 percent, the compact MKC crossover rose 10.3 percent, and the midsize MKX improved by 17.8 percent.

Over in Auburn Hills, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles saw overall sales sink by 13 percent. The mighty Jeep and Ram brands both lost 3 percent of their U.S. volume last month, compared to October 2016, while Chrysler dropped 22 percent. Fiat fell 33 percent. Dodge recorded a 41-percent drop in year-over-year sales. Only Alfa Romeo, something of a fledgling brand, saw its sales rise following the introduction of the Giulia sedan and Stelvio SUV. With 1,205 vehicles sold in October, Alfa’s tally represented a 5,139 percent year-over-year increase.

Across the board, the only FCA models to see year-over-year sales increases in October were the Jeep Compass, Cherokee, and Renegade (up 81, 19, and 9 percent, respectively), the Dodge Charger and Durango (up 19 and 11 percent, respectively), the Ram pickup line (up 1 percent), the Fiat 500L (up 34 percent to a whopping 159 units), and the Alfa 4C (up 96 percent to 45 units). Of these vehicles, however, only the Renegade and Ram pickup closed out October with more year-to-date sales than in 2016, and only by a small margin.

At General Motors, the passenger car slump weighed heavily. With all GM divisions combining for a 2.2 percent year-over-year sales decrease, last month saw GMC become the only brand to increase its tally compared to October 2016. The truck-and-SUV-only division posted a sales increase of 4.6 percent, spurred by a 25.5-percent uptick in Sierra sales. Acadia sales rose modestly (5.2 percent), while Canyon sales rose 2.7 percent. This compensated for year-over-year losses with the Terrain, Yukon, and Yukon XL.

So far, GMC sales in 2017 are up 3.7 percent.

The same picture is not as rosy over at Chevrolet, which posted a 3.8-percent year-over-year dip. Despite sales increases of the Equinox crossover (up 28.5 percent) and the Silverado pickup line (up 6.8 percent), it wasn’t enough to keep the brand in the sales black. Sonic sales sank 66.4 percent, year-over-year, and Cruze sales plummeted 35 percent. The Malibu ended the month down 9.3 percent. In fact, and this goes against the industry’s grain, the only Chevrolet car to post a year-over-year sales gain in October was the full-size Impala, which rose 24.1 percent.

Over at Buick, sales sank 4.5 percent, year-over-year, in the month of October. While the imported-from-China Envision seems to have lost traction, slipping 2.3 percent, the redesigned Enclave and subcompact Encore crossovers soared by 30.4 and 25.2 percent, respectively. On the other side of the popularity coin, the LaCrosse sedan and soon-to-be-replaced Regal sank 43.7 and 40.5 percent, respectively. Sales of Buick brand vehicles are down 5.7 percent over the first 10 months of 2017.

Cadillac’s October volume almost equalled last October’s showing, falling short by 0.1 percent. While the popular XT5 crossover picked up steam (rising 19.5 percent, year-over-year), rear-drive sedan sales plummeted even further. The ATS dropped 41.7 percent, the CT6 flagship fell 39.5 percent, and the midsize CTS posted volume lower by 23.9 percent. Each model sold less than a thousand units in October.

However, as bad as those sedans performed, one four-door passenger car came reasonable close to outselling all three combined. The venerable front-drive XTS, recently spared from execution and refreshed for the 2018 model year, saw sales rise by 49.6 percent. Perhaps livery companies are stocking up?

It should be noted that October 2017 featured one less selling day than October 2016, which helps skew sales figures downward (though by how much, we don’t know).

[Images: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, Ford, General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 34 comments
  • Eyeofthetiger Eyeofthetiger on Nov 01, 2017

    I bought a new Ford Fiesta last month. I do what I can to help.

  • Raph Raph on Nov 02, 2017

    I wonder how the refresh is going to work for Mustang? Sales IIRC were trending down heading into MY18 and not to many people are digging the updated look but Mustang has a potent performer on its hands with the new power plant and A10 trans. Late Model Restoration got their hands on a GT with the regular performance pack and the automatic transmission. They scaled the car and it was a tick under 3900 pounds yet they ran a 12 flat at almost 117 mph in so-so weather (this fall at a good track like Bud's Creek they should be into the 11's). Pretty impressive for a car that is easily 150 pounds heavier than its chief competitor and only has 5 extra horsepower on paper. I priced a base GT out at the Ford website using the X-plan (easy enough to acquire since you just join a club like MCA pay 50 bucks and get about a 2k savings) with the automatic and it came in at 35k. Not bad for a car that is fairly well equipped even in rental spec form offering the same sort of performance that cost 45-50k less than a decade ago if you wanted something fast with a blue oval. GM is supposedly planning a similar rental spec V8 Camaro. It'll be interesting to see how that pans out and how Mustang sales go as it heads toward the supposed new chassis in 2020.

  • Lou_BC Hard pass
  • TheEndlessEnigma These cars were bought and hooned. This is a bomb waiting to go off in an owner's driveway.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
Next