QOTD: We've (Not) Got the Power, So Where Should It Go?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

On Sunday, Matt brought you the story of Toyota’s latest plan to ditch its longstanding reputation for building boring yet reliable cars — a problem some quality deficient automakers would kill for.

The brand has recently bolstered its efforts to draw its design direction away from the realm of “safe” and into the neighborhood of edgy, funky, and just maybe, controversial. (How about that new Camry’s face, eh? Hmmm…) Still, design doesn’t equal driving thrills. Visual excitement doesn’t quicken the pulse after you’ve slipped behind the wheel.

To this end, Toyota appears ready to launch a performance line similar to Lexus’ F sub-brand. The automaker known for (very successfully) playing it safe may let its hair down. And not a moment too soon, some might say. While the upcoming 2018 Camry gains significant standard power from Toyota’s four-cylinder engineering prowess, vehicles like the C-HR crossover, Corolla, Corolla iM, and other models aren’t exactly causing heart palpitations on test drives (or any other drives, for that matter).

Let’s pick up that syringe filled with muscle enhancer, shall we?

If Toyota’s Yaris GRMN (Gazoo Racing Masters of Nürburgring) hot hatch shows us, it’s that the brand’s racing division is capable of massaging a pedestrian commuter car into a decent performer. Assuming it makes the trek to North America, no one’s kicking sand in this Yaris’ face.

So, if Toyota takes a page from, say, Nissan’s book — NISMOing all the things, as it were — what models need pumping up the most? There’s no shortage of choice. The rear-drive 86 2+2 sports coupe (formerly the Scion FR-S) has been forever saddled with a “nice effort, but needs more grunt” reputation. Its sales reflect it.

I’d argue, and many would agree, that the C-HR is in desperate need for more ponies, as well as a way to channel any power to the rear axle. Having a certified sports car in your stable’s nice, but what models actually sell these days? It’s crossovers all the way. Meanwhile, the Corolla and its five-door sibling are liable to break their wrists trying to punch through wet Kleenex.

Cover the low end of the market, I say. Offer hot variants across the compact class — both crossovers and passenger cars.

What say you, Best and Brightest?

[Image: Toyota]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 42 comments
  • NotMyCircusNotMyMonkeys so many people here fellating musks fat sack, or hodling the baggies for TSLA. which are you?
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Canadians are able to win?
  • Doc423 More over-priced, unreliable garbage from Mini Cooper/BMW.
  • Tsarcasm Chevron Techron and Lubri-Moly Jectron are the only ones that have a lot of Polyether Amine (PEA) in them.
  • Tassos OK Corey. I went and saw the photos again. Besides the fins, one thing I did not like on one of the models (I bet it was the 59) was the windshield, which looked bent (although I would bet its designer thought it was so cool at the time). Besides the too loud fins. The 58 was better.
Next