Oh No They Didn't: Overnight, Toyota Turns 2018 Prius C Into a Land Cruiser Pretender

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

It started last year. Toyota, in concert with upgrading the Prius C with Toyota Safety Sense C added a matte black bodykit to the lower portions of the 2017 Prius C.

But for 2018, the Toyota Prius C is a veritable off-roader — a Rubicon-rolling, 4×4 river-fording FJ Cruiser successor.

The 2018 Prius C’s black cladding reaches up and around the wheel arches, and that cladding is interrupted at the Prius C’s chin by skidplate-aping metallic accents, heaven forfend.

Although the Toyota Prius C has migrated from the passenger car world to the trail-running SUV arena with nary a ride height increase and the same front-wheel-drive architecture, Toyota has managed to avoid fuel economy degradation. The 2018 Prius C is rated at 48 miles per gallon city, 43 highway, and 46 mpg combined, same as before.

More seriously, is crossoveresque styling enough to spur a measure of demand for the oft-rejected Prius C? Relatively uncommon upon its debut, U.S. Prius C sales peaked at 41,979 units in 2013, its first full year. But by 2016, sales were less than half that strong, plunging 47 percent from 2015 levels. Compared with last year’s poor performance, sales through the first half of 2017 tumbled a further 39 percent. Only 7,049 Prius Cs were sold in America during the first six months of 2017.

So far this year, the Prius C’s share of America’s subcompact market has fallen to 3.6 percent (from 4.8 percent a year ago) as Toyota generates the bulk of its subcompact sales with the Mazda 2-based Toyota Yaris iA. The Yaris iA and Yaris hatchback combine to outsell the Prius C by nearly four-to-one.

With no meaningful mechanical upgrades, the 2018 Toyota Prius C will still be the car that, according to Car And Driver, accelerates from 0-60 miles per hour in 10.9 seconds. Don’t expect to be thrilled, unless of course you leave the pavement and head up a mountain pass in the middle of a post-mudslide snowstorm.

The 2018 Toyota Prius C has a base price of $21,525, up almost $500 compared with the 2017 Toyota Prius C One.

[Images: Toyota]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 14 comments
  • Brandloyalty Brandloyalty on Jul 25, 2017

    The reason for promoting black plastic cladding is that it looks like crap after a few years and so lowers the value of used cars.

    • Landau Calrissian Landau Calrissian on Jul 25, 2017

      That makes no sense; why would Toyota want lower residual values? Cheaper used cars only makes them look more appealing vs a new one. Higher resale helps them offer more competitive lease rates too.

  • Threeer Threeer on Jul 26, 2017

    Now folks will buy them and say they bought a hybrid CUV, blissfully unaware that they have a...wait for it...wait for it...hatchback! Watch for sales to climb! (said slightly tongue in cheek)

  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
  • SPPPP I am actually a pretty big Alfa fan ... and that is why I hate this car.
  • SCE to AUX They're spending billions on this venture, so I hope so.Investing during a lull in the EV market seems like a smart move - "buy low, sell high" and all that.Key for Honda will be achieving high efficiency in its EVs, something not everybody can do.
Next