SEMA CEO: Electrification Will Cost Aftermarket Jobs
The Specialty Equipment Marketing Association, or SEMA, represents thousands of aftermarket and automotive parts companies, giving it a unique level of sensitivity to changes in emissions, safety, and other vehicle regulations. Recent changes to EPA regulations could bring a seismic shift in the automotive market, making a significant portion of new vehicle sales electric early next decade. SEMA’s President recently shared the organization’s thoughts on the issue, which are predictably skeptical of the changes.
Mike Spagnola’s letter was posted on the SEMA site and said that the organization’s more than 7,000 members “have significant concerns regarding the impact of these proposed regulations on automotive small businesses.” He said the more than one million employees in the aftermarket industry are often overlooked in the push to electrify.
SEMA wants the government to be “technology neutral,” and Spagnola said the organization advocates “for the ability of consumers and the marketplace to choose what works best for them.” Though many companies are already working on aftermarket products for electric vehicles, it’s clear that SEMA views a widespread shift to EVs as a threat to its members.
“The specialty automotive aftermarket business has been built around the internal combustion engine,” Spagnola said. “It is also the same industry that has led the way in fuel innovations and conversions of old vehicles into new and cleaner technologies. Yet it is clear from the Biden administration's actions and words that electrification is their technology of choice.”
[Image: 6th Gear Advertising via Shutterstock]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.
More by Chris Teague
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Lorenzo Soon, the rental car lots will be filled with Kia's as far as the eye can see!
- Lorenzo You can't sell an old man's car to a young man, but you CAN sell a young man's car to an old man (pardon the sexism, it's not my quote).Solution: Young man styling, but old man amenities, hidden if necessary, like easier entry/exit (young men gradually turn into old men, and will appreciate them).
- Wjtinfwb Hmmm. Given that most Ford designs are doing relatively well in the marketplace, if this was forced I'd bet it was over the S650 Mustang. It's not a bad looking car but some angles seem very derivative of other makes, never a good trait for a car as distinctive as Mustang. And if he had anything to do with the abysmal dashboard, that's reason enough. Mustang doesn't need the "Tokyo by Night" dash arrangement of a more boring car. Analog gauges, a screen big enough for GPS, not Netflix and some decent quality plastics is plenty. The current set-up would be enough to dissuade me from considering a new Mustang.
- Lorenzo Aw, they don't need a designer - just put modern underpinnings on a 1955 Ford Fairlane. Stellantis could revive Chrysler and Dodge by putting modern mechanicals on a 1955 Imperial and 1955 Dodge Coronet.
- Lorenzo For both models, and their larger Accord/Camry models, the crash test ratings are very close, but only for late year models. The pre-2010 Civic and Corolla both fold like a cheap suit in a crash. If you're looking for a safer 10 year old vehicle, buy a truck.
Comments
Join the conversation
Kind of hard to be "Technology neutral" when you're trying to eliminate exhaust emissions from all vehicles. The push is for technologies that prevent emissions, which most importantly means not burning hydrocarbons for energy. Now, if you can burn straight hydrogen and NOT derive it from hydrocarbons, then I see no problem with SEMA keeping on as it does. But until that happens, fuel cells and batteries appear to be the way to go.
It is a proven fact that throughout the entire life-cycle (cradle to grave) of an electric vehicle, they are much more harmful to the environment than an ICE. From the mining of the minerals to create the toxic batteries to the electricity generated to recharge them. Go beat the "harmful to the environment in the long run" drum somewhere else!