Nissan Joins ChargeScape

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Last month, a tripartite of major brands announce the launch of ChargeScape, an endeavor intended to better integrate the charging demands of electric vehicles to the nation’s power grid. Now, Nissan has joined the fray.


BMW, Ford, and Honda – and now Nissan – are all part of this ChargeScape joint venture, which is described as a software platform which integrates electron-hungry EVs into the power grid, shoring up its stability while allegedly saving drivers a few bucks on their charging. The software is designed to wirelessly connect with EVs and manage the flow of electricity in consideration of real-time grid conditions. They claim EV drivers have the potential to be rewarded financially for this flexibility yet promise vehicles will always be charged to desired levels by whatever time is specified by the user. 

Participating utilities say this idea will temporarily reduce demand when the grid is strained through smart charging even potentially even send energy back into the network when needed. One presumes a vehicle and/or charging facilities capable of bidirectional charging is required to perform such a feat. Nissan is said to be investing heavily in this, while vehicles like the Ford F-150 Lightning are already packing this feature. Remember, we’re talking about bidirectional flow through the main charging port, not the commonly found household-style power outlets which pepper most EVs and can, in the case of a Lightning, provide just as much juice as a robust consumer-grade generator during a power outage.

Described as a tech company with offices in New York, the crew at ChargeScape list the automakers as ‘investors’, though it is noted Nissan takes a 25 percent stake in the joint venture by joining the fray. Using the ChargeScape backend software is a way for OEMs to roll out these types of charging features without needing to plow development dollars into an idea someone else has already sussed.


[Image: ChargeScape/Nissan/Ford]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • Wjtinfwb CR-V Sport Hybrid or Mazda CX-5 Premium Plus money. I like the VW, just a bit more spirit than the Honda and a touch more room than the Mazda. But if I'm spending my own money the "sure thing" Honda or Mazda will get my checkbook, not a troublesome VW.
  • Tylanner The Tiguan is a perfectly fine appliance...and actually handsome.
  • Jkross22 The design and marketing people at Ford are doing a great job. When will engineering and QA catch up?
  • Bkojote For people asking why this over a full-size truck it's simple: Full Size Trucks are terrible off road. They'e too wide, don't articulate well, get stuck on mountain trails, require 20-point-turns, and their suspensions aren't up to the task. Ask any Texan who tries to take their F250 up Yankee Boy Basin. That said, I'm seeing $10k MSRP markups on these at all my local dealers. That's Tacoma Trailhunter territory - which gets 6MPG better, has big-boy ARB equipment, and is going to be bulletproof compared to anything Ford makes.
  • Jkross22 This has always been an underpowered SUV with a legoland interior. Great design mucked by cheapness everywhere.
Next