BMW Vows To Keep a Gas Engine In the Next-Generation M3

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Many automakers have softened their once-aggressive electrification plans, but that hasn’t stopped several of them from backing off development of their thirstiest internal combustion engines. BMW is one of the few companies that have publicly affirmed their dedication to gas engines, as an executive recently said it would keep the M3’s gas-powered inline-six for at least one more generation.


BMW M CEO Frank van Meel told the German publication BimmerToday.de that the next-generation M3 performance car would retain a gas option alongside the expected electric model. Van Meel said he expected the quad-motor EV variant to deliver faster lap times, but keeping a gas option is a significant upside for enthusiasts, many of whom loudly voice their displeasure as automakers cut popular engines.


That said, BMW’s next-gen gas engine will have to comply with new Euro 7 emissions standards, which impose strict limitations on tailpipe emissions, battery construction, and more. At some point, the development costs and timelines to implement emissions-cutting technologies will overcome the profitability of gas-powered performance cars, but we can celebrate the M3 and others for now.

The next-gen cars are expected to start rolling off the production line late in this decade, and some expect the new M3 to be one of BMW’s last internal combustion vehicles. Recent models like the new M5 feature hybrid power, but many have criticized their weight. We’ll have to wait several more years to see how things pan out for the M3, but we can at least take the time to enjoy what we already have.


[Images: BMW]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • Jalop1991 bah. Nokian or Michelin all-weather tires for the win. Unless you're in extremes doing extreme driving--I'm talking heading to the slopes on roads that require chains as opposed to commuting to work and driving to the grocery store--you don't need to swap out shoes. People panic way too much and refuse to acknowledge that times and tire technologies have changed.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic Part of the problem are outrageous injury awards!!My local morning news has commercials quoting quarter of a million to half a million awards for soft tissue injuries. I keep the liability jacked up to the limit and the collision, but cannot afford the uninsured motorists coverage for it would double the premium. Then the governor raised the time limit to file suit for damages from one year to two years. Wait till that morsel hits your insurance rates. 🚗🚗🚗
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X For our wheelchair Dodge Grand Caravan, end of October to early April.
  • SCE to AUX TSLA's investors and Board of Directors should be very concerned. If this is supposed to be the future of Tesla, it's grim. I think we're witnessing the unraveling of the company with these dissipations. A truly updated Model S or X would have generated some real interest, as would a cheaper car (Model 2) with maxi volume.
  • Jalop1991 I work for the US arm of a Japanese-owned multinational conglomerate. We have a division that until earlier this year was run, for 10 years, by an absolute toxic piece of hsit VP. Run into the ground, actually, but he escaped scrutiny for 10 years by cooking some books. Anyway, finally the Japanese came in and "suggested" very strongly to US leadership that they get rid of this poison. They did--and instead of just having him retire immediately (he's like 67 years old), they "moved" him to the position of "special consultant to the CEO". It's another way of telling him to stay home and shut up and we'll keep paying you for a year or two, then you can gently retire--when your retirement won't be directly tied to the change of management in your old division. Welcome to corporate America.
Next