Rare Rides: The 1981 Honda Accord, a First-ever Family Car

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

The Rare Rides series has been a bit skimpy in its Honda coverage: We’ve featured only four in past editions. Today’s fifth Honda Rare Ride is the first-ever Accord, a car some readers won’t have seen in real life.

The Accord entered production in 1976 and was the company’s first foray into the family sedan in North America. Initially a compact, it was launched for the 1977 model year. At debut, Accord was available only as a three-door hatch, a body style which sadly would not make it out of the Eighties alive.

Launch Accords all used the same 1.6-liter inline-four, which pushed the 2,000-pound hatch forward via 80 horses. The Accord’s range was quickly expanded, and late in 1977, a more usable four-door sedan joined the hatchback. Said sedan didn’t reach North American shores until the 1979 model year. The sedan was a more upscale model than the hatch, and as such in many markets was fitted with a larger 1.8-liter inline-four. That mill produced a more respectable 72 horsepower, though CARB-ready California had their own engine version. The earliest Accords were fitted with a five-speed manual or two-speed automated manual, the Hondamatic.

Around the introduction of the sedan, Honda started to take the Accord upscale. An LX trim was added to the hatchback and offered power steering, a digital timepiece, and air conditioning. In the Japanese market, the Accord sedan appealed to the middle-class family with fancy covers made of lace for the seats, and of metal for the wheels. Just as well it was fancy, that larger 1.8-liter put it into a higher tax bracket than the 1.6 hatchback.

In North America, the Accord sedan was offered in three initial colors: beige, dark red, and silver. In 1980 the two-speed semi-auto was swapped for a three-speed transmission that was actually automatic. Other North American updates included some changes to bumper trim in 1980, and the arrival of new fabric and paint colors in 1981. Most notable in ’81 was a new SE trim that offered the highest levels of luxury: Power windows and calfskin leather seating surfaces. Instrument clusters were also reworked, and warning icons replaced the less preferable textual indicators.

The first-gen Accord remained in production through the 1982 model year in select markets but was largely replaced that year by a second generation. The second Accord was larger, more powerful, more modern, and Honda was on its way to sedan success.

Today’s Rare Ride is stunning in seafoam and available in Long Island with functioning air conditioning. Over the last 40 years, its accumulated just 87,000 miles. Even with the low mileage, the seller indicates the Accord’s shockingly poor rust protection necessitated four different wheel arch repairs over the years. Yours for $14,500, and given the scarcity of original Accords that’s probably not out of line.

[Images: Honda]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 63 comments
  • Myllis Myllis on Aug 28, 2021

    One car you should review in "Rare Rides". Itis Citroen Xantia Activa V6. It still has a speed record in Swedish car -magazine Moose test, beaten eq. Porsche 997 GT3 RS and McLaren 675. Xantia Activa still keeps the biggest G-force value in circular speed test. Question is not the power (0-100km/h 9.9s). Citroen develop to Xantia hydraulic active anti roll bars (in french "Systeme Citroën de Contrôle Actif du Roulis") and with Citroen's hydropneumatic suspension. Car was absolute a far away others and it still is. Even today no one is the same level as Citroen was 1990. I have had possibility to drive Activa and it's suspension.. it's from "Outer World". Activa's nickname was "magic carpet". Citroen use Activa system only in Xantia. I have Citroen C6 as everyday car.. Citroen C6 hydraulic suspension fullfills the term magic carpet, but it does't beat Activa system.

    • See 1 previous
    • Myllis Myllis on Aug 28, 2021

      @theflyersfan My father use Peugeot 404 over 25 years. Then he change it to Peugeot 505 -model. Both were solid as a rock. When Peugeot dominate WRC(FIA World Rally Car Championship -series) with Finnish drivers, Peugeot's special street legal models of 205 and 405 were really quick. Not forgotten Citroen BX GTi. Maybe, today's Yaris GR gives the same feeling? But Yaris GR designer was Tommi Mäkinen Motorsport. Tommi was four time WRC Champion (Mitsubishi Lancer EVO). GR has been done for rally not track.

  • SoCalMikester SoCalMikester on Aug 29, 2021

    mom got a 11 year old one in 1987, and it was already sunbaked inside and out. $1000 car that convinced her to keep buying japanese cars.

  • 3-On-The-Tree In my life before the military I was a firefighter EMT and for the majority of the car accidents that we responded to ALCOHOL and drugs was the main factor. All the suggested limitations from everyone above don’t matter if there is a drunken/high fool behind the wheel. Again personal responsibility.
  • Wjtinfwb NONE. Vehicle tech is not the issue. What is the issue is we give a drivers license to any moron who can fog a mirror. Then don't even enforce that requirement or the requirement to have auto insurance is you have a car. The only tech I could get behind is to override the lighting controls so that headlights and taillights automatically come on at dusk and in sync with wipers. I see way too many cars after dark without headlights, likely due to the automatic control being overridden and turned to "Off". The current trend of digital or electro-luminescent dashboards exacerbates this as the dash is illuminated, fooling a driver into thinking the headlights are on.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh given the increasing number of useless human scumbags who use their phones while driving (when it is not LIFE AND DEATH EMERGENCY) there has to be a trade off.It is either this, or make phone use during driving a moving violation that can suspend a license.
  • Wjtinfwb Great. Another Solyndra boondoggle wasting the tax dollars we contribute and further digging us into debt. The saying, "don't listen to what they say, watch what they do" has never been more accurate. All this BS talk about "preserving Democracy" and "level playing fields" are just words. The actions say, "we don't give a damn about democracy, we want to pick the winners and use the taxpayer revenue to do it". 100 million is chump change in auto development and manufacturing and doling that out in 300k increments is just a colossal waste. Nothing happens in a large manufacturing enterprise for 300k., it's a rounding error. A symbolic gesture. Ford and GM likely spend 300k designing a new logo for the 12V battery that runs your radio. For EV development it's a fart in a Hurricane.
  • Bd2 Let's Go Brandon!
Next