Quebec Banning Gasoline Dependent Passenger Vehicles in 2035

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

On Monday, the Canadian province of Quebec announced it would be joining California and numerous European locales in the banning of gasoline-powered automobiles. Announced during a meeting regarding the region’s green economy plan, the French-speaking province said all new vehicles sold after 2035 would have to be entirely electric. Then there was a slight derailment as Premier François Legault used the occasion to publicly decry that it was “totally unacceptable” that some shop owners in Montreal are failing to greet customers in French and that the situation needed to be remedied immediately. Montreal Mayor Valérie Plante agreed, saying “clients must be able to get served in French. Period.”

One battle at a time, heroes. Justice will be served (and in glorious French) to those English-speaking heathens and their foul-smelling cars soon enough.

Quebec’s environmental strategy envisions utopia only after reducing greenhouses gases 37.5 percent by 2030 (vs 1990 levels). According to Reuters, leadership also plans to spend $5.1 billion plan over five years to meet the goal and further incentivize electric vehicle purchases. The Québécois government website noted the region it would like to see 1.5 million EVs on provincial roads by 2030.

From Reuters:

Quebec will also renew the rebates on the purchase or rental of an electric vehicle and charging stations for citizens. Currently, the government offers individuals, businesses, organizations and Quebec municipalities a rebate of up to $6,100 on the purchase or lease of a new electric vehicle.

The government said it will also do its part by electrifying its provincial fleet of light vehicles as much as possible so that by 2030, 100 percent of its cars, vans and SUVs, as well as 25 percent of its pickups, will be electric.

The ban will bring Quebec in line with other jurisdictions such as California, the largest U.S. auto market, which in September announced a move to electric vehicles starting in 2035.

The Canadian province of British Columbia has already moved to phase out fuel-powered cars and trucks over a two-decade period, with a total ban on their sale or lease coming into effect in 2040.

Despite a large number of global leaders promising comprehensive, net-zero emissions plans, we’re dubious as to anybody achieving their environmental goals within the next decade. EV development is progressing more slowly than the industry had originally anticipated and there are real questions as to the sustainability of widespread electrification — especially without a complete and costly overhaul to the supporting infrastructure. We’ve already seen a few of these suggested internal combustion bans get pushed back by five years or more and imagine governments will continue moving the goalpost until circumstances actually allow for carbon neutrality.

It’s wonderful to see so many world leaders thinking about the future so often. But most of us have to live in the real world until it manages to catch up with the dream.

[Image: Jim Barber/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 69 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Nov 17, 2020

    I don't plan on buying an EV in the near future but who knows if I am still driving and looking for a new car in 2035 or 2040 I might buy one if the price is competitive and the battery technology and infrastructure improves which it most likely will. If I bought an EV it would be less as a statement and more because I like it and it better meets my needs. A government mandate is not going to force me to buy something but competitive prices and improved technology and reliability would be a more important factor in my deciding to buy an EV.

    • Fleeecy Fleeecy on Nov 18, 2020

      @Jeff S - Government mandates are not aimed at forcing you to buy something. It’s aimed at sending a clear message to carmakers so they work in the right direction. In this case, the right direction is to stop building ICE-only vehicles and to make PHEVs, BEVs and, maybe, Hydrogen-powered vehicles. The tech is there, it’s improving every day and very quickly. All we need now is to stop being dependent on petrol. Just make a PHEV version of every single ICE car out there. Can’t be that hard. Just look at the offerings in Europe. Also, make them build good BEVs and watch the prices drop as carmakers compete for our business.

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Nov 18, 2020

    @fleecy--True but the manufacturers are going to make the vehicles that sell. If few buy an EV then the manufacturer has little incentive to make them. I am not saying that EVs won't sell but the manufacturer is going to make the types of vehicles that are selling well. For example if the Government wanted most us us to buy compact and subcompact cars but most of us buy full size pickups or suvs then the manufacturer has little incentive to make compact and subcompact cars. I would likely buy an EV in the future if the price drops and the battery technology improves along with improve infrastructure. I doubt I would ever buy a Tesla but an EV competitively priced that can be serviced at most places would be a vehicle I would consider. Also affordable and readily available replacement parts for any parts that might wear out.

    • DenverMike DenverMike on Nov 18, 2020

      Too many stars would have to line up. The politicians just want to get their stink out there, so they can claim they took a stab at saving the planet during their corrupt stint in office, while not giving a crap about what's realistic.

  • Lynn Joiner Lynn JoinerJust put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
  • Lynn Joiner Just put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
  • Ollicat I am only speaking from my own perspective so no need to bash me if you disagree. I already know half or more of you will disagree with me. But I think the traditional upscale Cadillac buyer has traditionally been more conservative in their political position. My suggestion is to make Cadillac separate from GM and make them into a COMPANY, not just cars. And made the company different from all other car companies by promoting conservative causes and messaging. They need to build up a whole aura about the company and appeal to a large group of people that are really kind of sick of the left and sending their money that direction. But yes, I also agree about many of your suggestions above about the cars too. No EVs. But at this point, what has Cadillac got to lose by separating from GM completely and appealing to people with money who want to show everyone that they aren't buying the leftist Kook-Aid.
  • Jkross22 Cadillac's brand is damaged for the mass market. Why would someone pay top dollar for what they know is a tarted up Chevy? That's how non-car people see this.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic A great opportunity for an auto maker (Toyota) who’s behind the curve in EV development. Fisker would be the Leading Edge division with trickle down technology to the other divisions as EVs eventually become mandatory.
Next