Plow King: Electronic Nannies Give Jaguar I-Pace a Black Eye in Moose Test

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Jaguar’s electric I-Pace (not to be confused with the gas powered E-Pace) earned unflattering press this past summer after slow sales led to ballooning inventories of the brand’s first EV. Now, there’s another PR stroke against the model, and electricity once again lies at the core of the issue.

As new safety features proliferate across the industry, electronic stability control stands out as one of the veteran lifesaving nannies, joining the fray after anti-lock brakes, airbags, and crumple zones became the norm. In the I-Pace’s case, ESC conspired to turn the model’s “moose test” into a viral sensation.

Having no doubt seen many moose test fails in the past, EV-loving readers will be reassured to learn the I-Pace didn’t tip over or list onto two wheels during an obstacle avoidance test posted to YouTube by Spanish website km77. The low center of gravity afforded by the I-Pace’s large underfloor battery pack kept the cat planted, but the sudden movements of the test vehicle prompted the ESC to step in early and aggressively.

As you can see, the I-Pace, after the initial hard-left turn, locks the front driver’s side wheel, stymying the subsequent hard-right turn needed to get the vehicle back into its proper lane. Instead, the vehicle plows towards the far shoulder before the wheel finally loosens itself from the brake’s grasp. Cones were definitely harmed in this test.

The I-Pace once again enters plow mode once it’s back in the correct lane. Certainly, there was no vehicle upset or back-end sliding action, but the test’s results are not what any automaker wants to see from the moose test.

Recall that the same website once revealed an alarming issue with the Jeep Renegade after filming a test vehicle catching air with its rear wheels during hard braking.

After seeing the video, it’s clear the vehicle’s ESC could use some professional tweaking to better respond to emergency inputs.

[Image: Jaguar Land Rover]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 13 comments
  • Lorenzo Why does every SUV look like a military assault vehicle? The 1968 Ford Fairlane wagon looked better!
  • Lorenzo On a long, multi-state trip, I use AM exclusively to find out what's going on in the area I'm passing through. What I've heard on AM radio has induced me to roll up my windows and lock the doors in certain areas!
  • Lorenzo Automakers have traditionally squeezed their suppliers. Japanese suppliers are part of the design team (and interlocking ownership) and build in economies. Chrysler tried that, viewing suppliers as partners, but Mercedes put a stop to it, and went back to squeezing suppliers down to razor thin margins.Henry Ford assured quality parts at a low price by making his own parts. Anti-trust laws forced Ford to spin off parts divisions and buy parts from independent suppliers. Maybe Ford should work to get the anti-trust laws changed, and put the Rouge complex back in business.
  • Lorenzo Given the quality of Chinese-made products available everywhere in America, any EVs or ICE vehicles are not likely to even approach the quality level of Japanese or Korean automakers. Who will lend money to buy a vehicle that won't last the length of the car loan? Who will insure it?
  • Flameded Well.. "Forced Neutral" (while not a great thing) sounds like it would be preferred over.. say.. "Forced Park", or .. "Forced Reverse".
Next