The Cost of Future-proofing: German Auto Industry to Invest $68 Billion Into EVs, Mobility, Data Over Next Three Years

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The German Association of the Automotive Industry, known in its native tongue as Verband der Automobilindustrie (VDA), says its members have formally committed themselves to investing 60 billion euros (roughly $68 billion USD) into electrification and vehicular autonomy over the next three years.

The claim was made as part of a larger announcement serving as a rundown for what German automakers hope to achieve in a period where nothing seems certain.

The European Union, along with China and several other nations, have committed themselves to embracing electrification in a bid to lower emissions and modernize roadways. “In the next three years, we will invest over 40 billion euros in electric mobility, in addition to a further 18 billion euros for digitalization, and the development of networked or automated vehicles” said VDA President Bernhard Mattes, adding that German automakers anticipate 100 EV models on offer to the public by the end of that period.

Despite robust government encouragement, it’s an incredibly ambitious plan, considering vehicle sales appear to be stagnating across the globe and EV growth isn’t yet on pace to overtake internal combustion models until around 2035 — according to most analysts’ best guesses.

However, strict electrification isn’t the only aspect to this. Mobility is a blanket term the industry uses to denote any non-traditional businesses within the industry, and it’s a central element in Germany’s sizable investment. While it certainly indicates autonomous development and electrification, it can also means ride-sharing, connectivity, data accumulation, and more.

“Automobile manufacturers are becoming manufacturers and mobility service providers. This involves significant investments, especially in IT and software. Because these technologies are developing very rapidly, new, cross-industry collaborations are also useful and necessary,” emphasized Mattes. “For this we need a nationwide, dynamic 5G mobile network coverage along all transport routes.”

Mattes also said that Germany, plus a few other sizable (and wealthy) European economies, are set have a significantly higher share of electric vehicles among new registrations compared to the EU average. To bring the rest of the continent up to acceptable levels, the VDA believes Europe “must” expand the EV charging infrastructure and continue incentivizing electric vehicle purchases. It also hopes to avoid a no-deal Brexit, as it claims the decision would result in a major setback for the industry and the larger European economy.

While it’s not terribly shocking to see an automotive lobby group press for government assistance in the selling of vehicles, the push into electrification has already been spurred by government intervention. Increasingly stringent emission regulations and environmental initiatives effectively forced automakers to think differently about the future. It’s changing things, and you don’t need to look further than Daimler and BMW to see that. Once bitter rivals, the duo recently agreed to collaborate on mobility projects in an effort to mitigate R&D costs. Volkswagen plans to do the same with Ford, while also collaborating on more traditional products.

Whether or not this all pans out is another issue, however. Scaling EV production is a massive hurdle to overcome, especially when automakers don’t have a crystal ball or unlimited funds (even if they sometimes act to the contrary) and consumers are standing around shrugging their shoulders. Meanwhile, many automakers are stretching out into new businesses while hunting for fresh revenue streams. Still, most of these pursuits have yet to prove themselves as financially viable, at least not when compared to selling traditional autos with reasonably good margins.

We know Germany can sell cars people want to pay more for, but it’s less evident the same can be done with EVs. Undeterred, Mattes claims the electric revolution is coming to Europe and that everyone, especially the government, should be ready to help. The VDA thinks getting trade disputes settled would be a good place to start.

“Now everything must be done to reach a constructive solution at the negotiating table,” Mattes urged. “The talks and negotiations must now be conducted with high priority. We must not waste any time.”

“The United States, too, can not be interested in us mutually forsaking protectionist tendencies,” he continued. “We are the largest car exporter from the USA. More than half of the 750,000 cars we produce in the US are exported. Around 118,000 people are currently employed at the U.S. plants of our manufacturers and suppliers, 8,000 more than a year ago.”

[Image: Daimler AG]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 23 comments
  • Hreardon Hreardon on Mar 06, 2019

    I tend to be a contrarian and skeptic, and when I see the herd rushing one way, my brow furrows. It doesn't mean that the rush to electrification is wrong, but I think that automakers may be overselling the idea in the short term.

  • Schmitt trigger Schmitt trigger on Mar 07, 2019

    Inside looking Out; It took you 15 posts before you showed your MAGA colors. What took you so long?

  • Redapple2 4 Keys to a Safe, Modern, Prosperous Society1 Cheap Energy2 Meritocracy. The best person gets the job. Regardless.3 Free Speech. Fair and strong press.4 Law and Order. Do a crime. Get punished.One large group is damaging the above 4. The other party holds them as key. You are Iran or Zimbabwe without them.
  • Alan Where's Earnest? TX? NM? AR? Must be a new Tesla plant the Earnest plant.
  • Alan Change will occur and a sloppy transition to a more environmentally friendly society will occur. There will be plenty of screaming and kicking in the process.I don't know why certain individuals keep on touting that what is put forward will occur. It's all talk and BS, but the transition will occur eventually.This conversation is no different to union demands, does the union always get what they want, or a portion of their demands? Green ideas will be put forward to discuss and debate and an outcome will be had.Hydrogen is the only logical form of renewable energy to power transport in the future. Why? Like oil the materials to manufacture batteries is limited.
  • Alan As the established auto manufacturers become better at producing EVs I think Tesla will lay off more workers.In 2019 Tesla held 81% of the US EV market. 2023 it has dwindled to 54% of the US market. If this trend continues Tesla will definitely downsize more.There is one thing that the established auto manufacturers do better than Tesla. That is generate new models. Tesla seems unable to refresh its lineup quick enough against competition. Sort of like why did Sears go broke? Sears was the mail order king, one would think it would of been easier to transition to online sales. Sears couldn't adapt to on line shopping competitively, so Amazon killed it.
  • Alan I wonder if China has Great Wall condos?
Next