Report: Mazda 6 Drops Its Manual Transmission for 2019

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Changes come to Mazda’s midsize 6 sedan slowly, with mild — some might say imperceptible — styling refreshes and content changes usually occurring halfway through the model year. Last year saw a big and long-awaited addition to the slinky sedan: an available turbocharged 2.5-liter inline-four aimed at silencing, once and for all, enthusiasts’ cries of moar powah.

That mill brought 277 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque to a model often regarded as the most engaging midsize on the market, though buyers couldn’t pair it with the base model’s six-speed manual transmission. For 2019, however, it looks like no one will get their hands on a stick.

According to order guides seen by CarsDirect, the manual transmission disappears from the Mazda 6 altogether for 2019, leaving a six-speed automatic as the car’s sole gearbox. Yes, that means the Honda Accord will become the sole mainstream midsizer still available with a stick.

The equipment change also hikes the 6’s entry price. Rising $1,875 from the 2018 model, the base Sport’s after-destination MSRP comes out to $24,720.

For that sum, buyers get a 2.5-liter four-cylinder with 187 hp and 186 lb-ft, the aforementioned automatic, and a higher level of standard content. The addition of i-Activsense (Smart Brake Support, lane-departure warning with lane-keeping assist, automatic headlights, adaptive cruise control with stop & go) to the base model, combined with the automatic, means the entry-level 6 widens the price gap between it and the newly upscale Mazda 3. Factoring in those former options, the Mazda 6 only increases by $200.

Elsewhere in the 6 lineup, changes are meager for 2019. CarsDirect reports that loftier trims see a price climb of $325 to $725, with the Grand Touring Reserve gaining power folding mirrors. The top-flight Signature model will start at $36,020 after destination.

Production of 2019 models began in February, with delivery to dealers expected next month.

(Update: Drew Cary, senior manager of brand communications for Mazda North American Operations, confirmed the report in an email to TTAC, saying, “As we have moved the Mazda6 upscale with the launch of the Grand Touring Reserve and Signature models, we have seen less demand for a manual transmission option.”

Cary pointed to the continued existence of the manual transmission in the Mazda 3 and MX-5 lines, adding, “We will continue to listen to our fans and if their desires should change in future we will respond accordingly.”)

[Images: © 2018 Chris Tonn/TTAC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 60 comments
  • IBx1 IBx1 on Mar 28, 2019

    Mazda: hey we're the new BMW now People: neat Mazda: no really, look *eliminates manuals from their lineup*

    • See 1 previous
    • La834 La834 on Mar 29, 2019

      Just like the real BMW in other words...

  • ABC-2000 ABC-2000 on Mar 29, 2019

    Manual AT make sense only on your second car, I find myself using “brake hold” when I’m in heavy traffic since I am tired of holding the brake pedal, now, imagine holding the clutch pedal too? I drove a manual car for a week in Iceland and I enjoyed every mile, but in city traffic it is no fun at all!

    • Slavuta Slavuta on Mar 29, 2019

      No, you don't hold the clutch down - you will weaken the pressure plate. Whenever you can, put into first and crawl.

  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
  • Bike Rather have a union negotiating my pay rises with inflation at the moment.
  • Bike Poor Redapple won't be sitting down for a while after opening that can of Whiparse
Next