National Transportation Safety Board Makes Biennial Recommendations in 'Most Wanted List'

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has released its “Most Wanted List” of Transportation Safety Improvements it would like to see implemented by 2020, placing the obligatory emphasis on enhanced safety regulations. While it’s not surprising that a safety board would be a stickler on the public’s welfare, the NTSB is pushing for more safety nets in an era where cars are less dangerous than ever. That meant the agency’s recommended occupant protection measures dealt more with refining infrastructure and curtailing undesirable behaviors than modifying automobiles — but there was some of that as well.

According to the NTSB, automakers, motorists, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) should be focusing on finding better solutions to curtail distracted driving, operating a vehicle under the influence, and speeding. Then, and only then, can we achieve the NTSB’s dream of death-proof driving.

“Tens of thousands of people die in transportation accidents and crashes every year — our neighbors, our coworkers, our schoolmates, our family members,” explained the independent agency. “But they don’t have to. Most of these deaths are completely preventable. With each accident, we learn lessons about safety gaps and make recommendations that, if acted upon, could close these gaps.”

All told, the NTSB made almost 270 suggestions this year. For cars, the one of the biggest inclusions involved the nationwide banning of all mobile devices and help from the industry to create a device that would disable cellphones while in motion.

It also requested that national speed limits be kept to a minimum, with a follow-up request that the NHTSA “identify [the] best practices for communicating with law enforcement officers and the public about the effectiveness of data-driven, high-visibility enforcement programs to reduce speeding, and disseminate the best practices to local law enforcement agencies.” There was even talk about developing speed-limiting technologies,(e.g. variable speed limiters and intelligent speed adaptation devices) for use heavy vehicles, like trucks and buses.

A curiously strong emphasis was placed on mitigating impaired driving. In addition to calling for alcohol detection systems to be placed in vehicles, it faulted the NHTSA for not supporting these types of programs. Sounds ridiculous, right? Well, Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-MI) announced plans to introduce legislation that would mandate a breathalyzer in every new vehicle just last month.

“If we can keep one person from dying on the roads and make people think twice before getting behind the wheel when they shouldn’t. Even when they’re buzzed and think they are okay. Can’t we say we’ve been successful?” she said on the House floor in January.

However, the NTSB has allies elsewhere. Automotive News said the National Safety Council (NSC) already backs most of its plans by supporting lower alcohol-concentration limits and cellphone bans.

“Our cars are safer and smarter than ever before, yet we continue to lose 100 people each day to preventable crashes. We know the primary causes continue to be speeding, distraction and impairment, and we know more than half of those killed in crashes are unbelted,” the group said in a statement of support for the NTSB recommendations. “We can change national behaviors by doubling down on what works through improved education, legislation and strong enforcement — we just have to make the collective decision to move in that direction.”

The rest of the National Transportation Safety Board’s recommendations, at least as far as cars were concerned, involved increasing the implementation of collision avoidance systems on new vehicles. It wants advanced driving aids across the board, with many safety features becoming standard. However, it also wants to see the evaluation and testing of these systems become similarly standardized. Most especially, it wants forward-collision avoidance evaluated for their effectiveness. Once that has been accomplished, it intends to push federal regulators to begin mandating those systems on all passenger vehicles — followed by motorcycles.

If you don’t mind picking through the lengthy sections involving air, rail, and marine transport, the NTSB’s complete Most Wanted List can be found here.

[Image: Shutterstock user ddisq]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 23 comments
  • Slavuta Slavuta on Feb 06, 2019

    I think, NTSB fulfilled their mission. It is time for them to go away. And if they don't, we should destroy them. What they want to do, again? Put speed limiters and make us drive 50mph? Burn them in hell.

    • See 2 previous
    • Slavuta Slavuta on Feb 06, 2019

      @mittencuh I thought, TSA workers committed mass suicide.. Is anyone still flying? hahaha

  • Kendahl Kendahl on Feb 06, 2019

    There has been a long running effort to eliminate everything that could possibly cause injury or death no matter how egregious the user's negligence. Consider the interlock that stops your lawnmower's blade when you let go. That makes the machine safer only if you are the kind of idiot who sticks his hand underneath while it's running. I first heard of a proposal to fit all motor vehicles with speed governors, set to the highway speed limit plus 5 mph, nearly sixty years ago. Not long ago, someone in Canada built the prototype of a system that combined GPS and wireless internet to make governors location and time sensitive. It's not just cars. A city in western Nebraska proposed eliminating certain "excessively dangerous" leisure activities from its employee health care insurance. One was horseback riding. This was in cowboy country where a horse in the back yard is nearly as common as a pickup in the driveway. Anytime you hear someone say, "If it saves just one life," you can be sure that the cost per life saved is exorbitant, it involves a significant restriction on personal freedom, and there are better ways to save as many lives.

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next