Forget the British Diver, Here's Real Trouble - SEC Hits Elon Musk With Fraud Suit

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Documents filed in a Manhattan federal court Thursday reveal the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is suing Tesla CEO Elon Musk for fraud. The SEC opened an investigation into Musk after the CEO fatefully tweeted his intent to take the company private. “Funding secured,” Musk wrote in the August 7th tweet.

The go-private plan quickly fell apart. In the lawsuit, published by Bloomberg, the SEC accuses Musk of fabricating the claim made to 22 million social media followers, many of them investors.

“Musk made his false and misleading public statements about taking Tesla private using his mobile phone in the middle of the active trading day,” the SEC wrote. “In truth and in fact, Musk had not even discussed, much less confirmed, key deal terms, including price, with any potential funding source.”

In a later blog post, Musk claimed Tesla had engaged in talks with Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund, which was seen as a potential backer for the multi-billion share buy-up plan. Still, no details on secured funding arose. The Saudis later said this wasn’t their style of investment, and later announced $1 billion in funding for a startup Tesla rival. As it grew increasingly obvious that the statement didn’t have legs, the automaker’s share price plummeted. Investment banks were called in to seek the necessary funding before Musk pulled the plug on the plan.

Lawsuits from several investors rolled in around the same time the SEC investigation kicked off. Earlier this month, word of a Department of Justice probe broke in the media. While Musk is allowed to take his publicly traded company private, protocol demands that he announce his intent in a proper fashion to avoid blindsiding investors and traders.

“He did not discuss the content of the statements with anyone else prior to publishing them to his over 22 million Twitter followers and anyone else with access to the Internet,” the lawsuit states. “He also did not inform Nasdaq that he intended to make this public announcement, as Nasdaq rules required.”

It continues:

“According to Musk, he calculated the $420 price per share based on a 20% premium over that day’s closing share price because he thought 20% was a ‘standard premium’ in going-private transaction. This calculation resulted in a price of $419, and Musk stated that he rounded the price up to $420 because he had recently learned about the number’s significance in marijuana culture and thought his girlfriend ‘would find it funny, which admittedly is not a great reason to pick a price.'”

If the SEC gets its way, Musk will find the levers of power pulled from his grasp. The lawsuit seeks an order barring him from serving as an officer or director of a public company.

Tesla’s stock, already weakened by the shenanigans of the past month, plunged in after-hours trading, hitting $275.72 per share at 5 p.m. On the day of the Tweet That Started It All, Tesla’s stock closed at $379.57.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 58 comments
  • EquipmentJunkie EquipmentJunkie on Sep 28, 2018

    Following Musk over the last year has been a real soap opera. The twists and turns of the Tesla plot have been better than TV. Along those lines of watching the unthinkable, the thought occurred to me that this could have been an intentional means for Musk to escape his "deep production hell" that he found himself navigating. He could say that "The Man" took him out. Not likely a possibility, but we are dealing with a tiger of a different stripe with Musk. I keep coming back to a point that I have thought of for years and others have stated repeatedly, "With Musk's vast resources, why not go find the world's best automotive plant managers and durable goods supply chain managers and pay them 'I couldn't say No' money?" Perhaps I'm just too grounded in reality.

    • See 2 previous
    • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Sep 28, 2018

      @EquipmentJunkie: Tesla hired those experts, but they've been micromanaged by Mr Musk. Eventually, they leave.

  • Ernest Ernest on Sep 28, 2018

    The SEC has no sense of humor for this kind of thing. Just ask Martha Stewart how shallow their humor is.

    • APaGttH APaGttH on Sep 28, 2018

      Awwww, she was just kidding. She's a kidder.

  • Zipper69 "At least Lincoln finally learned to do a better job of not appearing to have raided the Ford parts bin"But they differentiate by being bland and unadventurous and lacking a clear brand image.
  • Zipper69 "The worry is that vehicles could collect and share Americans' data with the Chinese government"Presumably, via your cellphone connection? Does the average Joe in the gig economy really have "data" that will change the balance of power?
  • Zipper69 Honda seem to have a comprehensive range of sedans that sell well.
  • Oberkanone How long do I have to stay in this job before I get a golden parachute?I'd lower the price of the V-Series models. Improve the quality of interiors across the entire line. I'd add a sedan larger then CT5. I'd require a financial review of Celestiq. If it's not a profit center it's gone. Styling updates in the vision of the XLR to existing models. 2+2 sports coupe woutd be added. Performance in the class of AMG GT and Porsche 911 at a price just under $100k. EV models would NOT be subsidized by ICE revenue.
  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
Next