Ford: Does This Ass Turn You On?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

A lengthy Medium post penned by Darren Palmer, director of product development for Ford’s Team Edison, went live yesterday, no doubt at the request of Ford PR types and company brass. (It was shared on Ford’s media page.)

In it, the Ford product veteran goes on about the challenges facing his team of electric vehicle developers, mentioning, “The stakes are high.” Are they ever. With 16 fully electric vehicles on the way by 2022, joined by 24 electrified vehicles, that’s a heavy plate to carry. Despite having nearly 20 years of hybrid vehicle exposure under its belt, large swaths of the buying public remain confused by electrified powertrains (“Will my PHEV leave me stranded with an empty battery?”) and anxious about EV range. It takes time — a lot of time, apparently — to change hearts and minds. The U.S. EV take rate is less than 1 percent of new vehicle sales.

However, what created a splash on Thursday was not the revelation that building and selling EVs to the American public is hard, but the image accompanying the post.

In it, we see our first glimpse of the upcoming Mustang-inspired electric crossover that bore the name “Mach 1” before Ford quietly stopped calling it that. Due out in 2020, Ford’s aiming for a 300-mile driving range with this vehicle — a number that should quell the anxiety of most American drivers. (Technological wizard Bozi Tatarevic puts the range anxiety-beating threshold at 259 miles.)

Riding atop a platform shared by the 2019 Ford Focus you’ll never have a chance to buy and the next-generation Escape, this unnamed crossover is Ford’s opening salvo in the coming EV battle. Ford wants to dominate what it hopes anticipates will be a significant automotive segment.

While Palmer doesn’t dive into the vehicle’s specifics — it’s more of a rumination on the design process and human-centric this and that, plus the benefits of terrifying, open-concept offices — he did mention the upcoming EVs will boast an all-new infotainment system. It’s understandable Ford would want some gee-whiz tech to compliment the vehicle’s futuristic powertrain.

In a recent interview, Jim Farley, Ford’s head of global markets, said the upcoming vehicle would have “the profile of a Porsche Cayenne and the swagger of a four door Mustang.” Looking at this image, your author wonders if Ford’s courting danger by swinging too far in the Mustang direction, style-wise. Yes, it’s just a conceptual image that’s subject to change, but grafting Mustang taillights onto the clearly sleek (coupe-like?) body might be a cue too far. Surely the nose doesn’t follow the same path?

Then again, given the public’s aversion to electric vehicles, maybe this is the only way of making people who otherwise wouldn’t give two shits about an EV sit up and take notice. As we saw with the furor generated by the Mach 1 naming gambit, Mustang faithful might have a big problem with a very Mustang-inspired design. Of course, anger over another vehicle doesn’t stop Mustang owners from buying another Mustang. It might actually get a few thinking about expanding their vehicular family. Still, other Ford fans might not be too appreciative of a heritage-diluting styling gimmick.

Employing a brand-wide design language is one thing, but grafting model-specific cues onto a wholly unrelated vehicle could be taken as evidence that the company has lost its appreciation of the past, instead of the opposite.

The stakes are high, indeed.

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 24 comments
  • Akear Akear on Sep 07, 2018

    Same old Ford, same old crap.

  • RHD RHD on Sep 07, 2018

    The solution to range anxiety is a 200+ battery and a small gas tank with a small gas motor. If the battery goes flat, the gas engine propels the car while recharging the battery. A slightly raised CUV/SUV, for example, could have plenty of battery at the floorboards while still looking offroady (it's not going creek wading, anyway). Then the manufacturer could stage an around-the-country or cross-country challenge between the highest MPG gas car, the highest range electric car, and the combo gas/electric. The gas car would have to stop every three hours for fuel, the electric every three hours to recharge, and the combo every five or six hours to fill up with a bit of gasoline. The electrics could recharge overnight with no time penalties, since they would do that under normal usage anyway. They could present it Top Gear style, and live-cast it on Periscope or Twitter or whatever. Once the public sees that the new Ford Rangefinder won't leave you stranded on the way to Grandma's house, it would become generally accepted as a car to seriously consider when the current lease contract runs out. The three presenters/drivers could tally up the scores at the end on a large whiteboard, with total CO/NOx/CO2 emissions, total MPG, total cost of fuel and electricity, down time to refuel, and miscellaneous offbeat challenge scores to determine the winner.

  • KOKing Kinda hate to say this but they need to be an American Land Rover sans the offroad image (and capability). Leave the Escalade alone and do a shrunken Escalade-esque lineup (the first time I saw a Hyundai Palisade I thought that was the XT6 that Cadillac shoulda made) and dump the alphabet soup models and trims.
  • Theflyersfan How to fix Cadillac? Blackwing.Now I know (because I've asked) dealers are still thinking they are selling Demons with the kinds of markups on Blackwings, but for enthusiast drivers in the know, those cars are legit. They get lost in the shuffle of M-this and AMG-that, but they hold their own. However, with rising CAFE standards and upcoming emissions requirements, along with European CO2 limits, they all can't be turbo V8s with no hybrid propulsion. So at least mild hybrid them to try to eke out another 8-10 mpg average. That's a good start. Do something with the Escalade. These aren't the early 2000s when they had the hip hop image and every corner had a jet black Escalade with chrome rims. In my area, you just don't see them any longer as money has moved to the Germans. If they want to compete with the Germans, they have to downsize it and crank the engine up to 11. It's still way too truckish to compete with the Q8, X7, and GLS. Even though they probably don't want to, keep the sedans. Don't give those up to the Germans, Japanese, and Koreans as well. And with all that, go all in with performance. Become what BMW was over 15 years ago. They tried that before and half assed it, but they have the tools to make it happen now. Try to appeal to the audience that BMW and Mercedes left behind and that Genesis and Acura are trying to claim (or reclaim). Good luck Cadillac...you'll need it.
  • SCE to AUX Introduce a modern V-16 and put it into a Celestiq-like vehicle instead of electric.
  • DungBeetle62 For where we're at in the product cycle, I think there are bigger changes afoot. With this generation debuting in 2018, and the Avalon gone, is the next ES to be Crown based? That'll be an interesting aesthetic leap.
  • Philip Precht When Cadillac stopped building luxury cars, with luxury looks, that is when they started their downward spiral. Now, they just look like Chevrolet knock-offs, not much luxury, no luxurious looks. Interiors are just generic. Nothing what they used to look like. Why should someone spend $80,000 on a Cadillac when they can spend a LOT less and get a comparable looking Chevrolet????
Next