Concentrated Rides: An Imperial Collection

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Certain extraordinary circumstances can move a vehicle from the standard Rare Rides classification and into Concentrated Rides. Take today, for instance, where a concerned collector has gathered together 24 Chrysler Imperials in a California desert.

The why here is unclear.

From its inception, the Imperial was the pinnacle of Chrysler’s product offerings. Though the model originated in 1926, Imperial separated and became an independent luxury brand in 1955 (’55 above). Chrysler realized that if it wanted to compete with the likes of Lincoln and Cadillac, it needed a dedicated marque. After a fifth and final Imperial generation was sold for 1974 and ’75 model years, the brand went dormant. But it was not forgotten.

In the early 1980s, as Lee Iacocca became the top man at Chrysler, he desired a rebirth of the Imperial brand. More specifically, a new entrant in the hot personal luxury coupe segment. Chrysler was not in the best financial shape, but Iacocca had a plan. Calling upon his experience at Ford in the creation of the Continental Mark cars, he believed a new luxury coupe would show consumers that Chrysler was going places.

Aiming as high as possible, the luxury coupe would take top billing — above the Corinthian leather-lined Chrysler Cordoba. It was aimed directly at Lincoln’s brand new Continental Mark VI. The Imperial shared the rear-drive J platform that debuted for 1980 underneath the Cordoba and its pleb sibling, the Dodge Mirada. This new luxury car was ready for the 1981 model year.

The new Imperial was not available in any format other than a two-door coupe. The design was angular, distinctive, and made use of the bustle-back design cue found on the Cadillac Seville (and later ’82 Lincoln Continental). Unlike other luxury offerings of the day, badging was minimal. The previous Imperial avian logo was in use by the LeBaron since 1977, so Iacocca chose to use a Pentastar hood ornament instead. It was made of Cartier crystal, naturally.

Inside, the Imperial featured the latest in technology and convenience features. Power everything, climate control, electronic vacuum fluorescent dash, and even an integrated garage door opener. Even more Cartier crystals were found in the steering wheel and the opera lamps. Customers selected between cloth or a Mark Cross leather interior, or they could go all-out and spring for the all-blue Frank Sinatra edition.

The focus on technology continued under the hood, where all Imperials kept a 318 (5.2-liter) V8. New for the model was an electronic throttle-body fuel injection system that proved more problematic than not. The transmission was a three-speed TorqueFlite, which saw use in many cars of the era. You’ve heard about it in several previous non-Chrysler editions of Rare Rides.

Sales of the Imperial never lived up to expectations. Imperial’s brand prestige was questionable against the iconic Cadillac and Lincoln names. The styling, though unique, did not tie the Imperial well to other Chrysler models, and the lack of external badging meant the customer lacked product recognition. Reliability issues were not constrained to the new EFI system; the vacuum dash also had issues. And finally, the Imperial was priced above the Cadillac Eldorado. All of these factors added up to a short-lived luxury experiment for the Imperial. 1983 was its last year on the market, and the model name would only return (vaguely) in 1990 as a super-extended K-car.

Today’s Concentrated Rides appear in various states of decay, as they’ve sat uncovered in desert weather. Scanning the photos, it doesn’t look like there’s a Frank Sinatra among the illustrious collection. Currently listed on eBay, interested parties can buy one or more of Chrysler’s last luxury coupe, should they desire.

H/t to Sajeev Mehta for pointing this premium collezione to me.

[Images: seller, Chrysler, Corey Lewis/TTAC]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 34 comments
  • Cimarron typeR Cimarron typeR on Sep 17, 2018

    I was playing with my 3y/o son in my in-laws basement and he emptied a small can of Matchbox cars which had to have been 40 years old onto the floor and I found a Mirada, which had to have been based on this platform. As a child of the 80s I immediately got a warm feeling, I haven't seen one of these in over 20 years . Even here in Midwest,a fetching shape for sure.

  • WildcatMatt WildcatMatt on Oct 02, 2018

    These looks like the illicit offspring of an Olds Toronado and a Lincoln Mk VI.

  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
Next