A U.S.-launched Trade Dispute Is Helping Toyota in One Key Market, but for How Long?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

While the trade situation is still very much in flux, Toyota sees itself as standing to gain from the turmoil, just not in the United States. The automaker, along with other Japanese brands, finds itself in an advantageous position in China — a massive market facing its own troubles.

China’s anger at the U.S., and vice versa, could mean big bucks in the short term for Toyota.

According to the Financial Times, Toyota sees China as a big opportunity, and wants to capitalize on the current trade situation. In early summer, in response to tariffs levelled by the U.S., China slapped new tariffs on top of the ones it already applied to imported American cars. At the same time, it lowered tariffs on vehicles brought in from other countries, including Japan.

Toyota performs much of its manufacturing in Japan, and all of the Lexus-branded vehicle it sells in China arise from its home country. As the tariffs translated into higher prices for many U.S. luxury cars sold in that market, Lexus sales skyrocketed in August. The brand’s Chinese sales rose 59 percent, year over year, last month, setting a new monthly record.

Despite a three-month downturn in Chinese auto sales sparked by the trade tiff, Toyota recorded a 23 percent year-over-year sales increase in August. Compare that to Ford Motor Company’s 36-percent drop.

“It’s inevitable for Toyota to shift to China with a sharp slowdown in the US,” Masahiro Akita, analyst at Credit Suisse, told FT. “It’s also perfect for Toyota since it will help them to maintain their commitment to producing 3m vehicles in Japan.”

Last month, Reuters reported that Toyota planned to boost its Chinese automotive production by 20 percent, or another 240,000 vehicles per year. The automaker has assembly plants in Tianjin and Guangzhou, building 1.16 million vehicles per year. Increased state subsidies for electric vehicles and the country’s promise to relax, then eliminate, rules on foreign ownership has Toyota seeing green.

While much of China’s energy goes into building (and talking up) electric vehicles, it remains interested in hybrid technology — something Toyota knows much about. Sources tell FT that the country wants the maker of the Prius to share its technological prowess in that field.

Of course, there’s many ways this situation can turn sour for Toyota. China’s economy could tank, leaving fewer buyers for Toyota’s vehicles, or the U.S. could levy new tariffs on Japan, throwing its North American operations into chaos. Over the first eight months of 2018, Toyota Motor Corp. sales in the U.S. rose 1 percent, to 1,621,137 vehicles.

[Image: Toyota]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 12 comments
  • John John on Sep 25, 2018

    What I got from this article is that China has Import Taxes, Vats, Displacement Taxes and a Final Sales Tax on imported products. China does this to incentivize manufacturers to produce their products domestically and provides refunds/incentives to export does products from their Chinese factories. And now they have raised does Taxes on imported American Luxury vehicles, and other goods after the USA raised reciprocal VAT's on Chinese made cars, steel, aluminum and other manufactured goods. This simply looks like China wants to keep the status quo, have Foreign markets open to Chinese made goods while keeping their domestic markets closed and and controlled.

    • See 1 previous
    • Ect Ect on Sep 25, 2018

      "What I got from this article is that China has Import Taxes, Vats, Displacement Taxes and a Final Sales Tax on imported products" John, you should go back and actually read the article. With the exception of tariffs, none of these items are mentioned at all. And all of them (except tariffs), if and to the extent they exist in China would apply to both foreign and domestic products, so would be trade -neutral. And it is not true that the US "USA raised reciprocal VAT’s on Chinese made cars, steel, aluminum and other manufactured goods". There is no VAT in the US. At all.

  • Peter Gazis Peter Gazis on Sep 25, 2018

    STOP THE PRESSES! Toyota has a good month in China. Bravo when TTAC sends a report card home, to be signed by Toyota's parents, there should be a gold star in the China sales row. In other news the Cleavland Browns won their first game in 2 years. Lets talk Superbowl.

  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
Next