Mercedes-Benz Plots an Electric S-Class

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Did you ever the the feeling that the Tesla Model S was just an S-Class for EV enthusiasts? Mercedes-Benz sure hopes so, because its CEO, the mustachioed Dieter Zetsche, recently let fly that the brand has a full-sized electric under development called the EQ S. While Mercedes’ core lineup will welcome all manner of hybrid and mild-hybrid powertrains in the years to come, Zetsche says the brand will also start building fully electric vehicles by way of its EQ line.

The EQ nameplate is something we’ve heard a lot about in the past, but its true purpose has yet to be defined by Daimler. Typically, we’ve only seen EQ badging added to concept vehicles promising electrification, with no additional details. But new claims from the CEO suggest the category may be reserved for models that use batteries as their only power source.

According to Bloomberg, Zetsche said Daimler intends to launch 10 all-electric vehicles by 2022. He also said Mercedes will move into widespread electrification through the addition of 48-volt electrical systems — like on the 2019 CLS — and even some plug-ins. “All vehicles will be electrified,” Zetsche said.

Of course, there is a world of difference between a mild hybrid and a battery electric vehicle. That could be where the EQ designation comes in. Doctor Zee noted EQ cars will boast a battery range that’s “totally different” from what’s on offer today. Presumably, he means among Mercedes vehicles. However, Daimler’s head of R&D, Ola Källenius, said the company has been working with various startups on the development of solid state batteries for a couple of years.

Most estimates put a major breakthrough in the technology several years into the future. If Daimler were to get there first, it could allow Mercedes-Benz to leave all other EV manufacturers in the dust. Still, Källenius estimates solid-state technology probably wouldn’t come to fruition until 2025 at the earliest.

Meanwhile, the EQ S is estimated for production around 2020 and should offer Model S shoppers a very tempting alternative — even if it doesn’t have next-generation battery hardware.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 19 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Apr 13, 2018

    So Mercedes now apes Tesla? Are they going to make EQ X, EQ Y and EQ 3 too? Oh, forgot about EQ Roadster and EQ Semi. And please rocket too.

    • See 1 previous
    • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Apr 15, 2018

      Can I get a brochure for the 1972 Tesla line? Yeah, the Mercedes S class debuted in 1972.

  • Readallover Readallover on Apr 14, 2018

    The thing is going to weigh four tons.

  • Offbeat Oddity The RAV4, and I say this as someone who currently owns a 2014 CR-V. My aunt has a 2018 CR-V that has had a lot of electrical issues, and I don't trust the turbo and CVT to last as long as Toyota's NA engine and 8-speed automatic. Plus, the RAV4 looks sportier and doesn't have the huge front overhang.
  • Offbeat Oddity I'd go with Mazda, especially now that there's no more cylinder deactivation on the 2024 NA motor. It's around $4-5k less than the Toyota with similar equipment, and I think reliability is probably very close between them.Regarding reliability, hasn't this generation of RAV4 taken a hit? I know it's not rated as highly in Consumer Reports, and there were teething issues during the first few years. I'm surprised it's not mentioned in more reviews- even Jack Baruth's. I'm sure the bugs have been worked out by now, though.
  • Peter I want a self driving red ragtop 1958 Plymouth Fury. Just like the car in the movie Christine.
  • Mgh57 Doesn't seem like this tech is ready for prime time.
  • Nathan The Ram is the most boring looking of the full size trucks, kind of like a Tundra.If they cancel the Ram Classic, I hope a full resign makes the Ram at least look interesting.
Next