Ford Continues Fighting for Europe

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Ford Motor Company has a lot invested in Europe. While the continent spent decades operating facilities under the lose leadership of Ford of Britain, Detroit acquired direct ownership in 1950. From there it extended its influence dramatically, buying up established European manufacturers near the close of the 20th century. But things haven’t always been good; economic hardships have been par for the course and things haven’t been easy in a long time.

Presently, Ford makes around $75,000 in profit for each of its employees in the United States. In Europe, that number is about $4,300 per worker. While we’re sure that makes domestic line workers feel entitled to a small pay increase, the point is that the profit margins across the pond are pretty slim for Ford.

However, unlike General Motors, the company doesn’t want to abandon the region. The automaker says it’s taking a renewed interesting in figuring how to keep profits up and is avoiding any speculation that it might duck out of Europe entirely. But let’s revisit its hardships over the last decade so we can establish a framework for why Ford is having a rough go of it.

Obviously, the Great Recession was hard on everyone. By the time it reached Europe, Ford was already struggling in North America. The automaker recorded a net loss of $9.49 billion in the first quarter of 2009, but, as its global health increased, Ford’s European operations were still in trouble. From 2011 to 2014, Ford of Europe lost $3.1 billion on its own, leading many to presume the worst. But things turned around dramatically over the following two years, with the division seeing a pretax profit of $1.2 billion in 2016.

Since then, American sales have flattened and Chinese deliveries have been pushed down a steep hill. Meanwhile, European volume increased for 2017 but the brand only netted $234 million in profit. “Ford does not seem to have an economically viable business [in Europe] at present,” Max Warburton, analyst with Bernstein Research, reported at the start of this year. “Could 2018 see it also slim or exit Europe, given its years of losses in the region?”

Ford mentioned it was considering closing factories and raising prices in Europe after Britain’s vote to “Brexit” the European Union. Despite the devaluation of the British pound, Ford did better than expected that year and a full-blown crisis was averted. But with profits slimming again, 2018 could be a do-or-die kind of year.

According to Automotive News, the weakened British pound continues to be an issue for automaker. The United Kingdom is Ford’s third-largest market, but the nation’s currency hasn’t rebounded yet — although it has improved quite a bit since its low at the start of 2017. Ford estimated the currency devaluation stole around $600 million in profits last year. Increasing material costs are also playing a major role, and not just in Europe. With slim profit margins, elevated manufacturing costs, and a weak currency in the European nation that still loves it, Ford admits 2018 could be a rough year.

Assuming the the UK separates from the EU’s Customs Union, something the government has promised near the end of 2020, new tariffs could hamper Ford’s engine plants — which need to export motors from the UK to the European Union. If the manufacturer can’t mitigate rising costs elsewhere, that alone could be the final nail in the coffin.

Ford says it isn’t abandoning the region, however. Despite the mounting problems, the company claims it has taken a renewed interest in ensuring its sustainability on the continent. “We are committed, and we plan to stay,” Ford of Europe President Steve Armstrong told Automotive News Europe. He predicted European profits will increase in 2018, despite the hardships, and says Ford will cut costs where necessary to ensure it doesn’t go under.

The company also says it intends to go slightly upmarket with its Euro cars while injecting a few SUVs to account for changing consumer tastes. Why Ford wasn’t already pushing more crossovers in Europe is beyond us. To take full advantage of a trend, you typically need to be Johnny-on-the-spot.

Fortunately for Ford, the crossover fad hasn’t eased and could help the automaker until the next big consumer shift occurs. But it’s also worth noting the Ford Fiesta and Focus remain two of the United Kingdom’s best-selling autos, while the Focus-based Kuga SUV is also doing quite well in 2018. So there is hope yet for Ford of Europe to make it through this difficult period, regardless of what the critics say. Still, that doesn’t mean the company won’t pull out if it thinks it’s fighting a losing battle.

Ford isn’t stupid and knows globalization isn’t a guaranteed path to success. General Motors ditched the European continent for that very reason and might do the same in South Korea.

[Image: Ford Motor Co.]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 22 comments
  • Scandinavian Scandinavian on Mar 27, 2018

    DM - why is Ford, as one of Europe's biggest car producers, at a particular disadvantage by EU import taxes? Why would you not say Mazda, Mitsubishi and the Chinese with no EU production and importing 100% of their cars are the most disadvantaged? Do you believe Mercedes is not disadvantaged by the 25% import tax in the US e.g. for the Sprinter? Why do you think Mazda, Mitsubishi and VW don't sell their pick up trucks in the US (hint: they sell them in the EU - where import taxes are lower, and compliance legislation in tune with world markets). Another example: We're hearing Ford and GM complain time and again and yet again how they can't sell cars in Japan because of all these 'unfair obstacles' they encounter. The Germans just sold a quarter million cars there in 2017 - Mercedes 68,221 cars, BMW 52,527, VW 49,040, etc. Even Mini sold 25,427 cars. Ford? 551 cars. Maybe they should just try harder? I mean, clearly it can be done.

  • Tstag Tstag on Mar 27, 2018

    Given the UK is one of Ford's biggest markets then they were foolish to completely stop making cars there and shift nearly all production to Germany. They would be better positioned for Brexit if they had retained some manufacturing capability there. However there is a simple answer to that. If the UK and EU don't do a deal on cars (unlikely) then they should simply buy up some capacity from the likes of JLR or Toyota who may want to borrow some capacity from Ford to make more cars in the EU. Ford are right not to leave Europe like GM has done. By walking away GM will in the long term strengthen PSA. PSA will then start to attack other GM core markets. Running away from major markets like Europe is not an answer.

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next