Autumn in Detroit? North American International Auto Show Might Ditch January Date, Report Claims

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Anyone living north of, let’s be generous, the Mason-Dixon line or Ohio River, knows that January is probably the worst month in which to enjoy anything related to automobiles. Driving them, repairing them, and even travelling long distances to look at them.

Now, let’s say there was a car-filled extravaganza that occurred every winter in a northern city located next to a number of very large lakes and along a well-defined storm track. Surely, this could not only impede the enjoyment (and perhaps forward momentum) of said cars, but it could make getting to said northern city a challenge.

Suffice it to say, Detroit in January isn’t the most pleasant of environs, and the North American International Auto Show’s organizers know it. As concerns about the show’s waning appeal grow, sources claim the event is prepared to set up shop in a warmer month.

A month like, say, October.

That’s what sources familiar with the matter tell the Wall Street Journal, and it isn’t just because organizers are sick of bundling up against the windchill outside the Cobo Center. The last few years have seen a growing chrescendo of murmurs about whether auto shows are still relevant in our modern, connected society. Worse yet, major automakers are beginning to pull out of the event.

Following this year’s NAIAS, Mercedes-Benz said it was saying sayonara to the show, leaving a major section of the Cobo show floor vacant in 2019. Porsche and Volvo were nowhere to be found in 2018.

It’s an automaker’s prerogative — new product reveals can occur in any manner the company sees fit. If it wants to shell out for a press junket in some warm clime while showering the internet with information and high-res photos, consumers will know about the newest four-door SUV coupe just the same.

The Detroit auto show, first held in 1907 — in December, we should add — morphed into today’s NAIAS long after the Detroit Auto Dealers Association realized it needed to do something to get buyers excited about cars in the dead of winter. Motor City denizens would surely be more likely to hit frostbitten dealerships after seeing sultry sheetmetal in the flesh. Far-away readers enamored by images springing from glossy car mags would surely do the same.

That was then, and this is now. As automakers seek technological superiority in the emerging electric car, connected car, and autonomous car fields, the Consumer Electronics Show — held in Las Vegas the week before NAIAS — is now stealing a lot of Detroit’s thunder.

A spokesman for the show did admit organizers are “exploring opportunities to better leverage the how [sic?] and the region,” the Wall Street Journal reports. Speaking to the paper, Scott LaRiche, a Chevrolet dealer in nearby Plymouth, Michigan and chairman emeritus of NAIAS, said he’s often asked about the show’s date.

A new date in temperate October would make more sense, he claimed.

Switching winter for early fall (if that) likely wouldn’t be a huge disruption. New model year vehicles are usually on sale by that point, and upcoming product not yet ready for unveiling could wait until late November’s Los Angeles Auto Show for a turn at the spotlight. As well, it would give the show a months-long headstart on CES.

If anyone’s raising major objections, we haven’t heard them.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 19 comments
  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Mar 02, 2018

    I did the 2016 Paris Auto Show in August and it was great, the weather. I think these types of events should be held when the weather suits human activity outdoors. But, what about the vehicle design, release cycle? Vegas should be the venue for the US (post NAFTA) or North American auto show. Vegas is geared towards tourism better.

    • See 1 previous
    • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Mar 03, 2018

      @OliverTwist78 I can't remember. I go to France and Europe regularly. I know it wasn't 2015 because that's when I visited the Paris Air Show.

  • JSF22 JSF22 on Mar 04, 2018

    Growing up in Michigan my Dad drove me 100+ miles every year to attend. It was the high point of the year. I kept up the ritual with my son ... until I didn’t. It got notably better all through the 90s ... everyone was there ... there were interesting world premieres ... and then it started declining again as we all knew it would. I moved away but still attended most years. Until I didn’t. The last time I attended, maybe five or six years ago, I said never again. Some brands already had left, and they practically had the fudge stands back on the main floor. The “renovated” Cobo Hall was still a decrepit leaking pit which, except for the show floor itself, looked like it was in Bulgaria. The parking was its usual disaster. The few walkable hotels suck. And the salty grey slush was the same. If the organizers don’t move the date and if the city doesn’t fix the venue, it’s over.

  • Theflyersfan Non-performance models, probably the Civic based on the fact the interior feels and looks better in the Honda. Both of them are going to drive like adequate appliances with small engines and CVTs and get decent mileage, so this is based on where my butt will rest and things my hands and fingers will touch.Toyota doesn't have an answer to the Civic Si so the Honda wins by default.CTR vs GR Corolla. One dealer by me is still tacking on $10,000 markups for the CTR and good luck with the GR Corolla and the "allocation" system. There's that one dealer in Missouri that I pasted their ad a while back wanting $125,000 for a mid-level GR. Nope. But cars.com is still showing markups. Both of these cars will have little depreciation for a while, so the markups equal instant loss. It looks like Cincinnati-area dealers are done with CTR markups. So this is a tough choice. I don't like the Corolla interior. It looks and feels inexpensive. I'm glad Honda toned down the exterior but the excessive wing still looks immature for such an expensive car that 20-somethings likely cannot afford. FWD vs AWD. With price being an object, and long-term maintenance a thing, I'd go with the Honda with a side eye at the Golf R as a mature choice. All with stick shifts.
  • ChristianWimmer Great first car for someone’s teenage daughter.
  • SCE to AUX Imagine the challenge of trying to sell the Ariya or the tired Leaf.
  • Offbeat Oddity I would have to test them out, but the Corolla might actually have a slight edge. I'd prefer the 2.0 in both cars, but to get one in a Civic with a decent amount of equipment, I'd be stuck with the Sport where the fuel economy suffers vs. the Corolla. If the Civic EX had a 2.0, it would be a much tougher decision.
  • User get rid of the four cylinders, technology is so advanced that a four litre V8 is possible.. and plausible.. cadillac had a serious problem detuning v8s in the past, now theyre over-revving the fours and it sounds horrible.. get rid of the bosses and put the engineers in the front seat..
Next