Raptors in Richmond? Ford Makes Noises About Bringing the Uber-Ranger to America

by Matthew Guy

Published: February 12th, 2018

raptors in richmond ford makes noises about bringing the uber ranger to america

Reno, Rochester, Roswell … take your pick to complete the alliteration puzzle above. Whichever one you choose, it’s a safe bet that the Ford Raptor Ranger will be plying its roads at some point in the future. We think. Maybe.

Last week, the Blue Oval dropped a Raptorized version of its Ranger at an event in Thailand. At the time, Ford remained mum about the truck’s chances of showing up on American soil. Now, thanks to a Glass House engineer’s conversation with Australia’s Drive, we have a bit more confidence in saying the Ranger Raptor will be sold in the United States.

In a conversation with the Aussie site, the performance brand’s chief engineer, Jamal Hameedi, said the Ranger version is “better” to drive than even the F-150 Raptor, though the engine would likely need to be gasoline-powered if it were to be sold in the States. From the exchange:

“Raptors are a slam dunk for the US,” he told Drive. “I think it [the Ranger Raptor] would do really well in the states.

“No, no way, no way, [its size would be] perfect.

“I think it’s certainly like it’s a baby Raptor, it depends what you’re looking for. There are a lot of people that just want that size in a pickup truck and they don’t want anything larger.”

The man is correct. I can personally think of at least two individuals in my iPhone contact list who want a Blue Oval off-road bruiser that is not the size of six city blocks. Chevy has an answer for them in the form of its Colorado ZR2, while Toyota’s has recently snorkel-ized Tacoma TRD Pro looks like an increasingly compelling package. Ford would be wise to snap up these shoppers before they vacate the Blue Oval showroom for other brands.

The Ranger Raptor’s off-road résumé reads well, with approach and departure angles (32.5 and 24 degrees, respectively) within a hair’s breadth of the Chevy but enough for Ford to claim they are better than the bowtie measurements. The truck shown in Thailand was equipped with a 2.0-liter turbodiesel, but the chances of that engine showing up in the Ranger Raptor for our market is virtually nil. Bank on some version of Ford’s 2.3-liter EcoBoost inline-four or, if the company is feeling especially randy, the 2.7-liter EcoBoost V6 found in the F-150.

I think there’s little doubt that the baby Raptor will eventually be available stateside. The question of when, however, may remain unanswered for a while.

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

#America #EcoBoost #Ford #FordRanger #FordRangerRaptor #Off-Road #Ranger #Raptor #Thailand

Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 4 comments

Sub-600 on Feb 12, 2018

You can bring your Ranger Raptor to Roswell. Do not, however, bring it to Albuquerque, America’s stolen car capital. 1,373 auto thefts per 100,000 residents in 2016. Mind boggling numbers.

Like Reply
- PrincipalDan on Feb 12, 2018
  
  Oddly I never had my 1997 to 2004 generation F150 stolen in Albuquerque and it was on the top 10 most stolen vehicles list for many years.
  
  Like
Oberkanone on Feb 12, 2018

Unfortunate the North American Ranger is 100% different (per Ford) than global Ranger. Have to start all over to engineer a Ranger Raptor for USA and Canada.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

El scotto No rag-top, no rag-top(s) = not a prestigious car brand. Think it through. All of the high-end Germans and Lexus have rag-tops. Corvette is really its own brand.World-leading engines. AMG, M, S and well Lexus is third-world tough. GM makes one of the best V-8s in the world in Bowling Green. But nooooo, noooo, we're GM only Corvettes get Corvette engines. Balderdash! I say. Put Corvette engines in the top-tier Cadillacs. I know GM could make a world-class 3.5 liter V-6 but they don't or won't. In the interior everything that gets touched, including your butt, has to feel good. No exceptions.Some think that those who pay above MSRP and brag about it are idiots. Go the opposite direction, and offer an extended 10-year 100,000-mile factory warranty. At a reasonable price. That's Acura's current business model.
Carrera 2014 Toyota Corolla with 192,000 miles bought new. Oil changes every 5,000 miles, 1 coolant flush, and a bunch of air filters and in cabin air filters, and wipers. On my 4th set of tires.Original brake pads ( manual transmission), original spark plugs. Nothing else...it's a Toyota. Did most of oil changes either free at Toyota or myself. Also 3 batteries.2022 Acura TLX A-Spec AWD 13,000 miles now but bought new.Two oil changes...2006 Hyundai Elantra gifted from a colleague with 318,000 when I got it, and 335,000 now. It needed some TLC. A set of cheap Chinese tires ($275), AC compressor, evaporator, expansion valve package ( $290) , two TYC headlights $120, one battery ( $95), two oil changes, air filters, Denso alternator ( $185), coolant, and labor for AC job ( $200).
Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.