The Next Mach 1 Will Be Electric, but Will It Be a Mustang? UPDATE: High Performance Electric SUV?

Ronnie Schreiber
by Ronnie Schreiber

One of the talking points at Ford’s reveal of the North American market Ranger, Edge ST, and the latest coming of the Mustang Bullitt, was the automaker’s commitment of $11 billion dollars to the further electrification of Ford’s product lineup. An upcoming hybrid version of the F-150 pickup truck was announced and the presentation ended with the tease of a “performance” battery electric vehicle to be on sale for the 2020 model year under the Mach 1 name.

While it’s now clear that the new Mach 1 will be a purely electrically powered vehicle, Ford was less forthcoming about what kind of vehicle it is going to be. Don’t assume that it will be based on the Mustang.

Talking with a gaggle of reporters after the scripted presentation, Ford’s executive vice president and president of global markets, Jim Farley, reiterated that the Mach 1 will be a battery electric vehicle, not a hybrid, but he was coy about whether or not it would share the Mustang’s brand and/or platform.

When a reporter asked him if the new BEV would be “related” to the Mustang, Farley said related was a good word to use but he wouldn’t say if it would be actually based on the Mustang platform. Though Farley wouldn’t commit to saying the Mach 1 would be a Mustang, he did say that the $11 billion was targeted at electrifying, either as hybrids or pure BEVs, Ford’s entire product line of cars and light trucks.

It would be strange seeing the Mach 1 logo on anything other than a Mustang, but the proposed BEV Mach 1 makes me think of a recurrent idea over the past few years that had General Motors possibly expanding Corvette into its own sub-brand — something that will de facto happen when the mid-engined ‘Vette finally appears in showrooms alongside legacy front-engined models. Perhaps Ford sees a battery powered Mach 1 as a means of expanding the Mustang brand to more than one model. I suppose we’ll find out in a couple of years.

UPDATE: Late Sunday night, Ford PR rep Mike Levine replied to a tweet originating from TTAC friend and GM Inside News editor Michael Accardi, claiming, “The Mach 1 name captures the spirit of the new vehicle.” He went on to admit, “Ford will gauge reaction from potential customers before making a final decision on naming” the possible high performance battery electric SUV.

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

Ronnie Schreiber
Ronnie Schreiber

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, the original 3D car site.

More by Ronnie Schreiber

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • Dwford Dwford on Jan 15, 2018

    The name should be obvious: Galaxie. The Galaxie name suggests space, future, forward thinking. Then instead of Galaxie 500, they just change up the numbers to denote the range of the battery.

  • Raph Raph on Jan 15, 2018

    Hmmmm.... what sort of name in the Ford stable might work better than naming some three ton hybrid after one of its most storied Mustang models????? Ah jeez man... I don't know maybe using the name Lightning for a performance hybrid SUV might work? I mean Lightning has something to do with electricity and as far as Ford is concerned has something to do with trucks. I wonder if we will see a Transit Cobra?

  • El scotto Mobile homes are built using a great deal of industrial grade glues. As a former trailer-lord I know they can out gas for years. Mobile homes and leased Kias/Sentras may be responsible for some of the responses in here.
  • El scotto Bah to all the worrywarts. A perfect used car for a young lady living near the ocean. "Atlantic Avenue" and "twisty's" are rarely used in the same sentence. Better than the Jeep she really wants.
  • 3-On-The-Tree I’ll take a naturally aspirated car because turbos are potential maintenance headaches. Expensive to fix and extra wear, heat, pressure on the engine. Currently have a 2010 Corolla and it is easy to work on, just changed the alternator an it didn’t require any special tools an lots of room.
  • El scotto Corolla for its third-world reliability.
  • Aaron Recently cross shopped both cars. Decided to go with the civic sport. Like the non direct injection 2.0 engine (no long term carbon buildup) and preferred the Hondas transmission over the Toyotas. The civic interior seems much nicer and roomier. Also Honda had many more civics available to choose from vs Toyota. Got almost 2k off sticker. Felt it was the better deal overall. Toyota was not budging on price.
Next