From the VIN Docs: 2019 Chevrolet Silverado Keeps Its Old Sibling Around; GMC Sierra Does the Same

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Just like Ram’s revamped 1500, there’s an all-new Chevrolet Silverado 1500 and GMC Sierra pickup lying in wait for the 2019 model year. And, also like the Ram, General Motors plans to keep an old version of its full-size truck kicking around for buyers not interested in something new.

The news comes by way of GM’s Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) decoder document, recently submitted for 2019 model year vehicles. In the GM truck stable, it isn’t just the Silverado line that’s getting a new addition. GMC wants some of the same old-truck action Chevy’s having.

Though not talked about as much as the 2019 Ram 1500 (due for a Detroit debut — and series production — in January), all-new Silverados and Sierras will roll off the line later in 2018. Expect new technologies, updated styling, attempts at lightweighting, and the possibility of an optional carbon fiber bed.

But if none of this excites you, you might be interested in the Silverado Legacy. That’s the name of the current-generation model GM plans to produce concurrently with the next-generation truck. Whereas the updated model calls Flint, Michigan and Fort Wayne, Indiana home (plus some final assembly in Oshawa, Ontario), the Silverado Legacy is an Oshawa-only product.

Familiar engines return to the next-gen Silverado. There’s the fifth-generation 4.3-liter V6, two 6.0-liter V8s (gas and CNG), and the 6.6-liter Duramax diesel V8. Silverado Legacy buyers, however, aren’t lined up for much choice. Going old means an extended cab bodystyle and a 5.3-liter V8, rear- or four-wheel drive, and trims limited to Work Truck (fleet/base), LS, and LT.

The old Sierra soldiers on alongside its new sibling as the Sierra Limited. Powertrain and bodystyle mirror the Silverado Legacy, with trim choices relegated to fleet/base and SLE.

By offering fleets a lower-cost option in the form of a truck with development costs long since recouped, GM no doubt hopes it can budge the needle on the Silverado/Sierra’s flat sales trajectory while boosting revenue. The Silverado line might (barely) surpass its 2016 U.S. sales tally this year, but the post-recession high water mark remains 2015, when it sold just over 600,000 units. The Sierra’s in the same boat.

The GM twins’ main rival, Ford’s F-Series, has seen sales climb every year since 2009, with volume over the first 11 months of 2017 now standing at more than 807,000.

[Images: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 13 comments
  • Vulpine Vulpine on Dec 15, 2017

    To me the most annoying thing is that they're even considering releasing the '19 model so early in the year; new models used to be released for the fiscal year while half-year models were labeled as the XXXX-½ model. By 2025 we'll be seeing 2030 models in the showrooms, right?

    • See 1 previous
    • DenverMike DenverMike on Dec 15, 2017

      I'm sure it's not "all new" all new, just a re-skin, interior update of the current platform. Otherwise GM is stupid beyond belief. They're not so smart but I bet it's the same pickup platform since '07 and this is just another rehash.

  • Iamwho2k Iamwho2k on Dec 15, 2017

    The phone is ringing... Subaru on Line 1...

  • 3-On-The-Tree In my life before the military I was a firefighter EMT and for the majority of the car accidents that we responded to ALCOHOL and drugs was the main factor. All the suggested limitations from everyone above don’t matter if there is a drunken/high fool behind the wheel. Again personal responsibility.
  • Wjtinfwb NONE. Vehicle tech is not the issue. What is the issue is we give a drivers license to any moron who can fog a mirror. Then don't even enforce that requirement or the requirement to have auto insurance is you have a car. The only tech I could get behind is to override the lighting controls so that headlights and taillights automatically come on at dusk and in sync with wipers. I see way too many cars after dark without headlights, likely due to the automatic control being overridden and turned to "Off". The current trend of digital or electro-luminescent dashboards exacerbates this as the dash is illuminated, fooling a driver into thinking the headlights are on.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh given the increasing number of useless human scumbags who use their phones while driving (when it is not LIFE AND DEATH EMERGENCY) there has to be a trade off.It is either this, or make phone use during driving a moving violation that can suspend a license.
  • Wjtinfwb Great. Another Solyndra boondoggle wasting the tax dollars we contribute and further digging us into debt. The saying, "don't listen to what they say, watch what they do" has never been more accurate. All this BS talk about "preserving Democracy" and "level playing fields" are just words. The actions say, "we don't give a damn about democracy, we want to pick the winners and use the taxpayer revenue to do it". 100 million is chump change in auto development and manufacturing and doling that out in 300k increments is just a colossal waste. Nothing happens in a large manufacturing enterprise for 300k., it's a rounding error. A symbolic gesture. Ford and GM likely spend 300k designing a new logo for the 12V battery that runs your radio. For EV development it's a fart in a Hurricane.
  • Bd2 Let's Go Brandon!
Next