Chris Bangle to Automakers: You're All Wimps and Your Designs Stink

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

No car designer in recent history comes close to touching former BMW Group design chief Chris Bangle for controversy. For decades to come, auto scribes will pen articles looking back on his influence on BMW’s lineup, most of which will mention the “Bangle Butt” within the first 100 words.

Bangle’s 17-year tenure at the German automaker ended in 2009, after which he vacated the auto industry, started up a design firm bearing his name, and left his past products for the punditry to debate for all time. Well, Bangle is back, in a manner of speaking, and he’s working on a vehicle from an unlikely source.

He also spilled his guts at the Frankfurt Motor Show. The man known for avant-garde flourishes and risky design adventures claims “hyper-conservative, hyper-terrified” automakers are just re-toasting the same slice of bread.

“They’re being asked to do little more than just ‘give me a little twist on what we just did,'” Bangle told Automotive News Europe, referring to modern-day designers. “If it’s left up to these hyper-conservative, hyper-terrified companies that are so huge, and where everything is resting on a bottom line that could go south at any minute … well, these are the last people to ask for the courage to go forward into the future. The last people.”

He continued. “They defend their brands like the virtue of Guinevere and they are doing it by putting a chastity belt around the girl and, sorry, that’s not how you make kids. That’s not how you make a future.”

Pushing memories of the prodigious rumps and glitter-lined peepers of the Bangle-designed 5, 6, and 7 Series models for a moment, the man’s comments aren’t without a solid nugget of truth. The previous decade brought with it a crop of daring vehicles, and with it, successes and flops. Leaving BMW out of it, we saw the Honda Element and Scion xB, the Nissan Cube and Toyota FJ Cruiser, the Chevrolet HHR and SSR, the Chrysler PT Cruiser and Dodge Magnum, plus the first-generation Nissan Murano. And that’s just the “boxy” segment.

Outside of Germany, where safe, conservative styling goes to thrive (now that Bangle’s gone), long and straight character lines and giant, gaping grilles are the order of the day. There’s reason for this, as “daring” is likely to keep one crop of buyers away while another salivates. Much safer to not offend. Or is it?

Notable duds have emerged from automakers’ attempts to play it safe. Think of the toned-down seventh-generation Hyundai Sonata, which even the automaker admits, “Didn’t turn heads.” Think of the ninth-generation Honda Civic, a bland, beancounter-designed car that disappointed journalists and forced the automaker into an emergency design refresh. Think of the eighth-generation Chevrolet Malibu, which garnered snores after the attractive, well-received seventh-generation model garnered sales.

Though the ANE story’s author kept the brand’s identity a secret, Bangle made one of BMW’s competitors the target of pointed criticism. Saying the brand makes great use of technology and has a “wonderful” stand at Frankfurt, Bangle claimed “they have really good designers, but I’ve seen this all before in other places.”

Burn. Suffice it to say that company probably doesn’t have Bangle’s name on its speed dial.

Still, we said Bangle was back in the game, and not just because he was mouthing off at an auto show. The designer claims he’s impressed with the outside-the-box attitude of startup companies, admitting that his design shop is working on a car for just such an outfit.

“It’s an existing company that comes from a manufacturing point of view — not an automaker,” he said, leaving its true identity a mystery. Bangle claims the company approached him to create a concept car more than a couple of years ago. The vehicle’s final design is now nearing completion, and its reveal should come “sooner than later.”

“I feel strongly enough about this that I would put my name on this,” he added.

Let your minds go wild.

[Image: Wikimedia Commons ( CC BY-SA 2.5)]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 44 comments
  • Whitworth Whitworth on Sep 15, 2017

    Most of his designs were awful and they really aged poorly to boot.

  • Scott25 Scott25 on Sep 15, 2017

    The Fiat Coupe is still iconic, and I agree with the sentiment that he's the most influential car designer of the millennium so far. Also to the list of daring vehicles of the last decade....this decade has brought us the Juke, C-HR, Crosstour, Veloster, CR-Z , Evoque (and convertible), Paceman, Panamera Sport Turismo, and that's just in the North American market. I don't think 2010s design is any less (or more) daring than the 2000s.

  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
  • CM Korecko Cadillacs traditionally have been opulent, brash and leaders in the field; the "Standard of the World".That said, here's how to fix the brand:[list=1][*]Forget German luxury cars ever existed.[/*][*]Get rid of the astromech droid names and bring back Seville, Deville, Eldorado, Fleetwood and Brougham.[/*][*]End the electric crap altogether and make huge, gas guzzling land yachts for the significant portion of the population that would fight for a chance to buy one.[/*][*]Stop making sports cars and make true luxury cars for those of us who don't give a damn about the environment and are willing to swim upstream to get what we really want.[/*][*]Stop messing around with technology and make well-made and luxurious interiors.[/*][*]Watch sales skyrocket as a truly different product distinguishes itself to the delight of the target market and the damnation of the Sierra Club. Hell, there is no such thing as bad publicity and the "bad guy" image would actually have a lot of appeal.[/*][/list=1]
  • FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
  • NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
  • Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
Next