One Look Shouldn't Fit All Sizes: Jaguar Design Boss Plans to Help Buyers Tell Models Apart

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Fortunately, premium automakers have not adopted a One Size Fits All approach. We have choices. Plenty of choices.

Increasingly, however, we are seeing a One Look Fits All Sizes methodology, limiting our ability to distinguish between a 3 Series, 5 Series, and 7 Series at BMW; between A4s, A6s, and A8s at Audi; or between C, E, and S-Class sedans at Mercedes-Benz.

With the second-generation XF appearing all but identical to the first XF, and the subsequent launch of the entry-level XE closely resembling an abbreviated XF, Jaguar’s guilty of the same crime against differentiation.

Fortunately, famed Jaguar design director Ian Callum says future Jaguar designs won’t be revealed merely as S, M, and L versions of the same t-shirt.

“We will separate them more in the future,” Callum told Autocar, referencing the XE and XF in particular and confirming that the next-generation XE will also be rear-wheel-drive-based. While connected by traditional Jaguar themes, Jaguar will provide greater distinctions between its growing lineup. “There will be a constant grille, then a more flexible front.”

This explains why the new E-Pace, revealed yesterday, doesn’t look exactly like the larger F-Pace crossover. “We wanted the E-Pace to have its own character, its own place,” Callum told AutoExpress. “So its headlights are from the F-Type.”

Callum also says the E-Pace’s key side signatures, a line that begins at the headlights and disappears at the rear door along with a higher line that accentuates the hind quarters, are inspired more by the F-Type sports car than the F-Pace utility vehicle.

Design unity is integral to image building, particularly for luxury brands. High-end automakers want their entry-level buyers to feel as though they bought into something premium, an upmarket lifestyle. But if the entry-level model doesn’t look anything like its more expensive siblings, then what is the image-conscious customer acquiring?

Unfortunately, design unity has gradually become design uniformity. Without a measuring tape, it’s not easy to tell which one is the Audi A4 and which one is the Audi A6. Is that a C-Class Cabriolet or an E-Class Cabriolet?

Now it becomes Ian Callum’s job to convince Jaguar’s other division heads that some differentiation is healthy, as the need for greater distinction may only increase. Asked by Autocar about the potential for even smaller Jaguars, “No plans, but I’d like to think so,” Callum said.

[Images: Jaguar]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • Scott25 Scott25 on Jul 15, 2017

    The only ones I can't tell apart are the Audis, and that's only because the A6 and A8 sell in such minuscule numbers. The Mercedes can easily be figured by amount of ugliness, they generally get better looking the bigger they are.

  • WildcatMatt WildcatMatt on Aug 01, 2017

    Say what you want about the Buick ventiports, but when they were properly implemented it told you exactly what model it was.

  • Make_light I like Subarus, and I often think they don't get enough credit for how they drive. Lots of people say it's the faux-rugged image that accounts for their popularity, but they also drive with a solidity and plantedness that's absent from a lot of the Japanese competition. That being said, this thing is ugly. I never felt that Subarus were as ugly as commenters claim they are. Boring, sure, but not necessarily ugly. But between this and the refreshed Legacy, it's like they're trying to make their vehicles look as incohesive and awkward as possible.
  • SCE to AUX I think the 2.2 was a pretty durable engine.
  • Rochester We'll probably be trading in our 2018 Touring Edition Forester for the next model, and are waiting to see what the Hybrid is all about. Would be nice if they disclose whether or not it will be a plug-in Hybrid.
  • CEastwood I have a friend who drives an early aughts Forrester who refuses to get rid of it no matter all it's problems . I believe it's the head gasket eater edition . He takes great pains regularly putting in some additive that is supposed prevent head gasket problems only to be told by his mechanic on the latest timing belt change that the heads are staring to seep . Mechanics must love making money off those cars and their flawed engine design . Below is another satisfied customer of what has to be one of the least reliable Japanese cars .https://www.theautopian.com/i-regret-buying-a-new-subaru/
  • Wjtinfwb 157k is not insignificant, even for a Honda. A lot would depend on the maintenance records and the environment the car was operated in. Up to date maintenance and updated wear items like brakes, shocks, belts, etc. done recently? Where did those 157k miles accumulate? West Texas on open, smooth roads that are relatively easy on the chassis or Michigan, with bomb crater potholes, snow and salt that take their toll on the underpinnings. That Honda 4 will run forever with decent maintenance but the underneath bits deteriorate on a Honda just like they do on a Chevy.
Next