Ford to Fling Driveshaft Repairs at Transit Owners Until It Figures Out a Solution

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

There’s a problem underneath 2015-2017 Ford Transit models and, until the Blue Oval figures out a long-term fix, owners and operators of all Transit variants can expect a new driveshaft flexible coupling every 30,000 miles.

The automaker has announced a safety recall for 402,462 Transits sold in North America in order to prevent instances of driveshaft separation caused by a faulty flexible coupling. Ford seems to have become aware of a looming problem with each vehicle’s driveline, which apparently isn’t nearly as robust as the automaker had hoped.

Ford claims it isn’t aware of any accidents or injuries stemming from driveshaft separation. However, it wouldn’t know of the problem if it hadn’t already happened. While the vehicles involved in the recall aren’t old, potential failure of the flexible coupling might not be far off for many of them.

“Based on the field data, Ford does not expect the current flexible couplings to deteriorate sufficiently to result in driveline separation in vehicles with less than 30,000 mile,” the automaker said in a statement.

It describes the risk potential as such:

In the affected vehicles, continuing to operate a vehicle with a cracked flexible coupling may cause separation of the driveshaft, resulting in a loss of motive power while driving or unintended vehicle movement in park without the parking brake applied. In addition, separation of the driveshaft from the transmission can result in secondary damage to surrounding components, including brake and fuel lines. A driveshaft separation may increase the risk of injury or crash.

As a permanent fix isn’t yet available, Ford has issued owners a game plan. If your Transit has less than 30,000 miles on it, simply wait until it reaches that point, after which a Ford dealer will happily install a new flexible coupling free of charge. Should your Transit already have a recently replaced driveshaft or flexible coupling, wait until the components rack up 30,000 miles.

As for owners of Transit with more than 30,000 miles on the odometer, get thee to a Ford dealer for a replacement immediately. The automaker claims “the interim repair will consist of replacing the driveshaft flexible coupling every 30,000 miles until the final repair is available and completed.”

A Securities and Exchange Commission filing uncovered by USA Today shows the recall will set Ford back a cool $142 million. That’s certainly the last thing the automaker needs. Ford has blamed a series of recalls for a steep drop in first-quarter 2017 earnings.

Of the recalled vehicles, 370,630 were sold in the U.S. and 26,254 were shipped to Canada. Another 2,361 Transits found their way to federalized territories, with 3,217 shipped to Mexico. The issue affects medium, long, and extended wheelbases of Transit vans and buses, as well as medium-wheelbase chassis cabs and cutaways.

Soon, Ford must choose between two permanent solutions. The automaker claims it could install “either a redesigned flexible coupling with a modified driveshaft bracket and shield or a revised driveshaft equipped with a universal joint.”

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 37 comments
  • TR4 TR4 on Jun 30, 2017

    If the propeller shaft can't take the torque from Americans' bigger engines/automatic transmissions I wonder about the rear axle.

  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Jun 30, 2017

    cramerica and Adam and others, Read; "In addition, separation of the driveshaft from the transmission can result in secondary damage to surrounding components, including brake and fuel lines. A driveshaft separation may increase the risk of injury or crash." The affected Fort Transit vehicles were build in the USA assembly plant from Jan 2014 to Jun 2017. For vehicles affected with more than 30,000 miles on the clock an interim repair will be undertaken.

  • Bd2 Eh, the Dollar has held up well against most other currencies and the IRA is actually investing in critical industries, unlike the $6 Trillion in pandemic relief/stimulus which was just a cash giveaway (also rife with fraud).What Matt doesn't mention is that the price of fuel (particularly diesel) is higher relative to the price of oil due to US oil producers exporting records amount of oil and refiners exporting records amount of fuel. US refiners switched more and more production to diesel fuel, which lowers the supply of gas here (inflating prices). But shouldn't that mean low prices for diesel?Nope, as refiners are just exporting the diesel overseas, including to Mexico.
  • Jor65756038 As owner of an Opel Ampera/Chevrolet Volt and a 1979 Chevy Malibu, I will certainly not buy trash like the Bolt or any SUV or crossover. If GM doesn´t offer a sedan, then I will buy german, sweedish, italian, asian, Tesla or whoever offers me a sedan. Not everybody like SUV´s or crossovers or is willing to buy one no matter what.
  • Bd2 While Hyundai has enough models that offer a hybrid variant, problem has been inadequate supply, so this should help address that.In particular, US production of PHEVs will make them eligible for the tax credit.
  • Zipper69 "At least Lincoln finally learned to do a better job of not appearing to have raided the Ford parts bin"But they differentiate by being bland and unadventurous and lacking a clear brand image.
  • Zipper69 "The worry is that vehicles could collect and share Americans' data with the Chinese government"Presumably, via your cellphone connection? Does the average Joe in the gig economy really have "data" that will change the balance of power?
Next