Mazda Has No Death Watch For The Mazda 6

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Mazda’s U.S. lineup has already suffered enough cutbacks, according to North American boss Masahiro Moro.

“I don’t have any intention to cut any nameplate right now,” Moro told Automotive News following a meeting of the National Dealer Advisory Council earlier in May.

This means the Mazda 6, often thought to be prime Death Watch material based on its low-volume status in the shrinking midsize sedan category, remains as firmly installed in the Mazda showroom as ever.

But where’s the Mazda 6’s replacement? Not on the immediate horizon.

There are key words to pluck out of Moro’s statement to Automotive News’ Michael Wayland.

Intention.

Right now.

You could, if you were as skeptical as TTAC is wont to be, produce a simple translation.

I don’t intend, at the moment, to cut any nameplate. Not at this moment, anyhow.

There’s reason to believe the Mazda 6 isn’t the kind of vehicle a brand might keep around. Only 2 percent of the midsize cars sold in the United States in the first four months of 2017 were Mazda 6s. The 6’s market share hasn’t decreased this year — it’s actually up marginally — because it’s 9-percent rate of year-over-year decline isn’t as drastic as the drop experienced by the overall sector.

U.S. midsize car volume is down by a fifth so far this year.

Numerous low-volume models have already been cut over the last few years, from the Mitsubishi Galant and Suzuki Kizashi to the Dodge Avenger and Chrysler 200. Even when the sales output isn’t obviously small, the task of making money — of successfully selling midsize cars at a price that actually earns a profit — in a segment controlled by a handful of high-volume dominators is particularly challenging. In the case of the Mazda 6, sales have fallen 43 percent since peaking in 2004, just the second full year of the 6’s 626-replacing tenure.

Not surprisingly, when TTAC asked Mazda for timing on the fourth-generation 6’s arrival, the company wasn’t willing to unlock its product planning lair. But the 6, Mazda spokesperson Jacob Brown says, “is one of our global core models.”

Mazda also points to continuous improvements throughout a generation’s lifecycle — the 6’s new interior in 2016, for example, and the installation of G-Vectoring Control for MY2017 — as distinct from mid-cycle refreshes.

With new Camrys and Accords and Altimas due to arrive long before the presently four-year-old Mazda 6 is replaced, Mazda considers these steady improvements to be essential for what will quickly become one of the older designs in the segment.

“Driving the 2014 model back to back with the current one would highlight many improvements, both visible and invisible,” Jacob Brown tells TTAC. The 6 might not be the newest design, Mazda believes, but that doesn’t mean it will feel like the oldest car.

Meanwhile, according to Masahiro Moro, “Our portfolio is clearly in good shape.” Mazda has recently killed off the Mazda 2 subcompact and Mazda 5 minivan in North America. The China-oriented CX-4 and Japan-oriented CX-8 won’t arrive in North America to bolster the brand’s crossover lineup.

And the Mazda 6, like the two more popular Mazdas that produce two-thirds of the brand’s sales, will soldier on.

At least that’s the intention. Right now.

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 45 comments
  • Zerofoo Zerofoo on Jun 01, 2017

    I drove the Mazda 6 late last year and really liked it. Unfortunately for Mazda I have a model 3 reserved. I doubt I'm the only one holding off on a car purchase while waiting for Tesla to get going on the Model 3

  • CV Neuves CV Neuves on Jun 02, 2017

    In my very personal opinion one of the very best looking cars on the market - even more so in the above color. Regretfully, almost everybody says, the rest of it does not quite live up to what one would hope for. Sad.

  • Lou_BC Nah. Tis but a scratch. It's not as if they canceled a pickup model or SUV. Does anyone really care about one less Chevy car?
  • ToolGuy If by "sedan" we mean a long (enough) wheelbase, roomy first and second row, the right H point, prodigious torqueages, the correct balance of ride/handling for long-distance touring, large useable trunk, lush enveloping sound system, excellent seat comfort, thoughtful interior storage etc. etc. then yes we need 'more' sedans, not a lot more, just a few really nice ones.If by "sedan" we mean the twisted interpretation by the youts from ArtCenter who apparently want to sit on the pavement in a cramped F16 cockpit and punish any rear seat occupants, then no, we don't need that, very few people want that (outside of the 3 people who 'designed' it) which is why they didn't sell and got canceled.Refer to 2019 Avalon for a case study in how to kill a sedan by listening to the 'stylists' and prioritizing the wrong things.
  • Lou_BC Just build 4 sizes of pickups. Anyone who doesn't want one can buy a pickup based SUV ;)
  • Jor65756038 If GM doesn't sell a sedan, I'll buy elswhere. Not everybody likes SUV's or crossovers or is willing to buy one no matter what.
  • ToolGuy One thing is for sure: Automakers have never gone wrong following the half-baked product planning advice of automotive journalists. LOL.I wonder: Does the executive team at GM get their financial information from the Manager of Product and Consumer Insights at AutoPacific? Or do they have another source? Hmm...
Next