Junkyard Find: 1993 Plymouth Voyager With Five-Speed Manual

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

The original K-platform-based Chrysler minivans, built for the 1984 through 1995 model years, sold like mad, helped kill the station wagon, and forced the competition to get serious about selling minivans in the United States. Buyers could get the 1984-95 four-cylinder Caravan, Voyager, or Town & Country with a five-speed manual transmission, though few did.

Here’s the first 5-speed second-generation Chrysler minivan I have ever found in a wrecking yard.

This isn’t the only second-gen Chrysler minivan I’ve seen with a manual transmission, however; Team Van Gogh races a 1993 Caravan with a five-speed and turbocharged 2.5 engine swap in West Coast 24 Hours of LeMons races. It’s quick.

By the middle 1990s, automatic transmissions and air conditioning had become all-but-required equipment in US-market vehicles that weren’t penny-in-the-vise miserable econoboxes. This Voyager has AC, but the El Cheapo™ interior and crank windows suggest that the original purchaser may have been a motivated miser. Was the automatic Voyager more expensive than the manual in 1993?

I’m tempted to go buy the pedal set out of this van, because I know some LeMons team is going to need it for a manual-transmission conversion in a hooptie Town & Country. These parts may be shared with the not-so-rare 5=five-speed Dodge Shadow/Plymouth Sundance, though.

Under the hood, we see the produced-by-the-octillion Chrysler 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine. Voyager buyers in 1993 could opt for Chrysler 3.3 or Mitsubishi 3.0 V6s, generating 150 and 142 horsepower, respectively. While you could get a Dodge Daytona with the Mitsubishi V6 and five-speed in 1993, Chrysler’s V6 minivans were automatic only.

Sold in Colorado, will be crushed in Colorado.

“The evolution of the minivan is now complete.”

Note that the automatic transmission is a big bragging point in this ad.

The genuine article, on sale at The Minivan Store.








Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 46 comments
  • ToddAtlasF1 ToddAtlasF1 on May 15, 2017

    I love the LeMons photo with the Mustang II and the Pinto. Putting them on the track still seems more like performance art than racing, but it is cool to see such unlikely cars at speed.

  • Garak Garak on May 16, 2017

    I had one like this a couple years ago, it had something like 400000 km on the clock. It had the acceleration of a glacier, but could cruise comfortably all day, and got about 8.5 liters per 100 km (28 mpg). It was a sad day when I had to scrap it.

  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
  • Bike Rather have a union negotiating my pay rises with inflation at the moment.
  • Bike Poor Redapple won't be sitting down for a while after opening that can of Whiparse
Next