Bob Lutz Thinks Corvette Should Be a Brand

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Former General Motors vice chairman and product development bigwig Bob Lutz has always had lots to say about the Chevrolet Corvette, and advanced age hasn’t diminished his enthusiasm for the model and its potential.

Even in the pre-recession, pre-bankruptcy days, a pre-retirement Lutz opined that the ‘Vette nameplate could host more than just a sports car. Back then, Lutz wasn’t saying that Corvette should be spun off as its own make, but he is now.

In an exercise in hypothetical product planning, The Detroit News envisioned a future — renderings and all — in which the Corvette brand spawns a sport SUV, a la Porsche and just about every other high-performance, premium automaker.

Such a creation could prove a money-maker for GM, especially if the automaker abides by the ‘Vette tradition of using plenty of off-the-shelf parts, the publication figures. Calling it the XC7, writer Henry Payne assembled advice from ex-GM brass on how the utility vehicle could succeed. What automaker wouldn’t want the bragging rights of a 650-horsepower, Z06-powered do-anything wagon?

Both Lutz and former Corvette program head Tom Wallace agree on the basics. A lightweight body structure, rear-drive proportions and optional all-wheel drive are no-brainers for a sport SUV, as are the Corvette’s engines. Lutz clearly has Porsche on the brain.

“Like the Cayenne, the appeal of the ’Vette SUV would be RWD proportions. It should, in fact, have a silhouette not too different from a Cayenne,” he said. Its price would also need to undercut the Europeans.

While he admits that the need to develop a suitable platform for such a vehicle could sink the project, not to mention the sales damage it could do to Cadillac and GMC, Lutz remains bullish on the Corvette’s brand power. If not an SUV, then something else.

“Corvette is a powerful brand that should be developed,” he said. “Go upmarket with a mid-engine sedan using big Cadillac CT6 architecture, and maybe eventually something like Cayenne. They would split it off from Chevrolet — nobody makes that connection anyway.”

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 56 comments
  • Sportyaccordy Sportyaccordy on Mar 28, 2017

    I agree with him. Escalade should be its own brand too. Prius should be a separate brand for Toyota too. I tell you hwut.... I see Corvette as a more viable brand than Cadillac, at least on the passenger car side.

  • Philadlj Philadlj on Mar 28, 2017

    ...And I think Bob Lutz should stick to running VLF into the ground before (finally) retiring. He's earned it.

  • ToolGuy Please allow me to listen to the podcast before commenting. (This is the way my mind works, please forgive me.)
  • ToolGuy My ancient sedan (19 years lol) matches the turbo Mazda 0-60 (on paper) while delivering better highway fuel economy, so let's just say I don't see a compelling reason to 'upgrade' and by the way HOW HAVE ICE POWERTRAIN ENGINEERS BEEN SPENDING THEIR TIME never mind I think I know. 😉
  • FreedMike This was the Official Affluent-Mom Character Mobile in just about every TV show and movie in the Aughts.
  • Offbeat Oddity The RAV4, and I say this as someone who currently owns a 2014 CR-V. My aunt has a 2018 CR-V that has had a lot of electrical issues, and I don't trust the turbo and CVT to last as long as Toyota's NA engine and 8-speed automatic. Plus, the RAV4 looks sportier and doesn't have the huge front overhang.
  • Offbeat Oddity I'd go with Mazda, especially now that there's no more cylinder deactivation on the 2024 NA motor. It's around $4-5k less than the Toyota with similar equipment, and I think reliability is probably very close between them.Regarding reliability, hasn't this generation of RAV4 taken a hit? I know it's not rated as highly in Consumer Reports, and there were teething issues during the first few years. I'm surprised it's not mentioned in more reviews- even Jack Baruth's. I'm sure the bugs have been worked out by now, though.
Next