Junkyard Find: 1994 Audi 90 S

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

The folks at Audi got really confusing with their American-market car names for a couple of decades and I have given up trying to sort out from memory, say, when the 5000 became the 100 or the 200 or whatever the hell it became in the chaos following the Unintended Acceleration Debacle. The Audi 80 was sold in the USA as a 4000 or something — it’s all a blur — but then Audi badged it as an 80, except for the sedans, which were 90s, I think.

Anyway, this California ’94 sedan has 90 S badges and it’s a fairly interesting car.

It made it very close to 200,000 miles, which is great for a high-maintenance German car in a state with the ball-bustingest emission testing in the country. My guess, based on the good condition and high miles, is that it’s a one-owner car that was loved dearly … until the time came to trade it in on (probably) a new A4 or S4. Buyer interest in high-mile Audis with manual transmissions and front-wheel drive hovers somewhere between zero and oh gawd no, so it washed up in a San José wrecking yard.

The buyer of this car recognized that all-wheel drive doesn’t provide many benefits in a region with no dirt roads, no snow, and very little rain, and he or she went for the more sensible front-wheel-drive version of the 4000/80/90/6000SUX/Horch 830BL.

Five-speed? Damn right.

With all the dozens of Audis — including plenty of 1.8T- and V8-powered models — that have competed in the 24 Hours of LeMons, only one has taken the overall win at a race: a front-wheel-drive Audi 90 powered by a V6. Tellingly, it is campaigned by a team made up of Audi dealership mechanics.

The V6 engine in this car made 172 horsepower, which was just 17 less than the straight-six in the 1994 BMW 325i. The 90 S listed at $27,820, versus $29,990 for its BMW competitor; the ’94 Mercedes-Benz C280 with a 194-hp L6 was $34,900, though burly security guards might have escorted you from the dealership if you’d been the kind of person to request a manual transmission in one.

Don’t break the glass!

This era of Audi sedans was all about manly rock-n-roll in Germany.

With the TDI version (not available in the United States, because diesels are all about diminished expectations), you could drive from (some miserably gloomy Northern European location) to (some sunny Southern European location) on one tank of oil!

[Images: © 2016 Murilee Martin/The Truth About Cars]






Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 36 comments
  • MRF 95 T-Bird MRF 95 T-Bird on Aug 02, 2016

    Occasionally I'll see the Cabriolet version of the 90 on the road or on E-bay. They were only equipped with the 2.8 auto and FWD.

  • Jerome10 Jerome10 on Aug 02, 2016

    Ha. I'm amazed at all the gushing love for these cars here. Because frankly, these were hunks of expensive junk.

    • See 1 previous
    • Cimarron typeR Cimarron typeR on Aug 16, 2016

      I owned one of these, a laser red '95 model over black leather, 5spd. I sold my 93 Probe GT. It was one of the most reliable cars I've ever owned, and one of the longest ownership runs I've had. I bought it sight unseen from Beecham Audi in Cinn., as a CPO with 58k in '99. The only things that broke on that car was an electric antenna which was under warranty at the time, a cat. conv. replaced under emission warranty at 70k, and fuel pump at 148k or so,ironically as soon as we arrived home from a round trip from STL. I kept it for 170k. I had timing belt /water pump done at 90k. I never replaced the Torsen fluid as per my mechanic and the drivetrain was in perfect running condition upon sale. Until recently we still saw "Red" in South KC. I sold it to a couple who actually broght their bass( the instrument not the fish) to make sure it fit in the rear compartent. The suspension woke up with Konis SAs in front , Bilstein HD in rear. I would have went Bilstein all around but there was no front fitment. This car suffered the same issues as other VAG products with poor clear coat , my brothers Ur S6 had same issues. I had the top half and black lowers repainted at a body shop in a bad area of town for cash only for 350.00. I really liked the styling it was a mini A8 which was an aspirational at the time.It had one of best HVAC systems I've ever experienced based on complaints of the previous generations poor cooling capability, I think they over engineered it.The heater especially, combined with the heated seats, a first for me, was quick to warm the car as I spent most of my time at work with the car uncovered. The locking center Diff was unstoppable in deep snow even with no season tires mounted, and lack of electronic nannies and mechanical throttle linkage made for an analog driving experience and plenty of fun on snow covered parking lots. Overall a pleasant experience of ownership. Unfortunately with Audi withdrawing the manual from the new A4, they won't likely be getting any new car business from me.

  • Make_light I like Subarus, and I often think they don't get enough credit for how they drive. Lots of people say it's the faux-rugged image that accounts for their popularity, but they also drive with a solidity and plantedness that's absent from a lot of the Japanese competition. That being said, this thing is ugly. I never felt that Subarus were as ugly as commenters claim they are. Boring, sure, but not necessarily ugly. But between this and the refreshed Legacy, it's like they're trying to make their vehicles look as incohesive and awkward as possible.
  • SCE to AUX I think the 2.2 was a pretty durable engine.
  • Rochester We'll probably be trading in our 2018 Touring Edition Forester for the next model, and are waiting to see what the Hybrid is all about. Would be nice if they disclose whether or not it will be a plug-in Hybrid.
  • CEastwood I have a friend who drives an early aughts Forrester who refuses to get rid of it no matter all it's problems . I believe it's the head gasket eater edition . He takes great pains regularly putting in some additive that is supposed prevent head gasket problems only to be told by his mechanic on the latest timing belt change that the heads are staring to seep . Mechanics must love making money off those cars and their flawed engine design . Below is another satisfied customer of what has to be one of the least reliable Japanese cars .https://www.theautopian.com/i-regret-buying-a-new-subaru/
  • Wjtinfwb 157k is not insignificant, even for a Honda. A lot would depend on the maintenance records and the environment the car was operated in. Up to date maintenance and updated wear items like brakes, shocks, belts, etc. done recently? Where did those 157k miles accumulate? West Texas on open, smooth roads that are relatively easy on the chassis or Michigan, with bomb crater potholes, snow and salt that take their toll on the underpinnings. That Honda 4 will run forever with decent maintenance but the underneath bits deteriorate on a Honda just like they do on a Chevy.
Next