Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 Mule Passes 'Jalopnik Test' on Nurburgring (Video)

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

A wing and aero kit really can make a vehicle fly.

The Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 prototype heating up the Nurburgring had all the go-fast bits, but it was a rear brake lockup that caused this test driver to do his best impression of Patrick George.

Bowtie fans have wiped saliva off their keyboards ever since the thinly disguised, next-generation Z/28 showed up at the German track earlier this week. Don’t worry, when the model finally hits showrooms, anti-lock brakes are sure to be on the standard features list.

Yesterday’s accident occurred as the Camaro powered through a pretty routine turn. After exiting the inside of the turn, the vehicle’s driver’s side wheels approach the grass and the brakes are applied.

Instant rear-wheel lockup ensues, pushing the tail out and lining the Camaro up for a date with the wall. Front lockup follows, and Bowtie and Armco consummate their relationship. After the crunch, the Camaro performs the limp of shame back over to the grass.

Photos taken after the crash show damage to the front passenger side, but not as much as you’d expect from the altitude the vehicle attained during the kiss.

Expect the range-topping Camaro to use the beastly supercharged 6.2-liter V8 from the already hot ZL1. That mill cranks out 640 horsepower and 640 pound-feet of torque.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 21 comments
  • Xflowgolf Xflowgolf on May 13, 2016

    I'm in the camp that says something either broke, or electronics issue. It's not a place on track where any trained/competent test driver would be on the brakes hard enough to lock up the rears in the first place, even without ABS. Do these use an e-diff type setup? wonder if it locked/broke or got a signal in error causing that type of lockup. I know things go bad in a hurry, and driver error with ABS switched off is certainly possible.

    • Rpn453 Rpn453 on May 13, 2016

      Could be just a failure at the rear axle. It appears that he does try to correct before giving up and locking the fronts himself to scrub some speed before impact. It's got to be a failure of some sort though. No competent driver would react to a bit of instability by braking, or braking harder, in that situation, and no competent driver would then try to steer while locking the brakes himself. That's two very basic mistakes back to back. The correct reaction would happen automatically in a fraction of a second: release brakes, correct instability, reapply brakes. He had enough track ahead of him to do that multiple times and still come to a complete stop in the middle of the track if he wanted. The guy also didn't appear to be flustered after it happened, as you would expect from a novice driver who just got in over his head. He immediately moved out of the way and parked it; calmly, quickly, and safely. He doesn't appear to be embarrassed or ashamed as he gets out of the car. It's got to be an electronic failure though. A mechanical failure would have almost certainly remained locked after the impact. Look what happened to Jack in an M3 in 2011: "As I enter the pitlane, however, the BMW goes insane, flashing the dashboard and abruptly braking me to a shrieking, clattering halt without my intervention. I radio for help and the car ends up needing to be restarted a few times before deciding to let go of the brakes. This is, frankly, terrifying. What if the brakes had “grabbed” while I was negotiating the infamous Turn Nine?" http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/02/review-2012-ford-mustang-boss-302-and-boss-302-laguna-seca/ If a production vehicle can do that, it's no surprise that a test vehicle could too.

  • Namesakeone Namesakeone on May 13, 2016

    Anyone else notice that there are at least two cars in the video (or at least two license plates)?

  • Wjtinfwb Hmmm. Given that most Ford designs are doing relatively well in the marketplace, if this was forced I'd bet it was over the S650 Mustang. It's not a bad looking car but some angles seem very derivative of other makes, never a good trait for a car as distinctive as Mustang. And if he had anything to do with the abysmal dashboard, that's reason enough. Mustang doesn't need the "Tokyo by Night" dash arrangement of a more boring car. Analog gauges, a screen big enough for GPS, not Netflix and some decent quality plastics is plenty. The current set-up would be enough to dissuade me from considering a new Mustang.
  • Lorenzo Aw, they don't need a designer - just put modern underpinnings on a 1955 Ford Fairlane. Stellantis could revive Chrysler and Dodge by putting modern mechanicals on a 1955 Imperial and 1955 Dodge Coronet.
  • Lorenzo For both models, and their larger Accord/Camry models, the crash test ratings are very close, but only for late year models. The pre-2010 Civic and Corolla both fold like a cheap suit in a crash. If you're looking for a safer 10 year old vehicle, buy a truck.
  • L&L I have a 2004 Xb right now the odometer reads 265,000 miles no mayor issues ,pay 14,500 . you don't need complaints about this lunch box the best .
  • Jeanbaptiste 2022 Tesla model 3 performance ~35000 miles tires - ~$1000ish. Several cabin filters ~$50
Next