Want Your Vehicle to Retain Its Value? Make Sure It's Big, or Bigger

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

If you’re looking to get the most money back when you drop your car onto the used market in five years, better get into something large and utilitarian.

Large and midsize trucks and SUVs grab the top five-year resale values in Edmund’s 2016 Retained Value Awards, with conventional and luxury midsize and large cars depreciating the most.

The biggest winner at trade-in time is the Jeep Wrangler, which muscles out competitors like the Toyota 4Runner to capture the traditional midsize SUV crown. Retaining 62.7 percent of its value in five years, the Wrangler tops the category’s already lofty 62-percent average.

Toyota’s Tacoma bested the midsize truck category with a 66-percent retained value, while the automaker’s Tundra accepted the large truck crown by holding on to 58.6 percent of its value.

The rest of the five top categories saw the Ram 2500 take the heavy-duty prize (58.6 percent) and the GMC Yukon win for large traditional SUV (52.6 percent).

Worse-performing categories favored Japanese and European automakers. The Subaru WRX was tops among compact cars (58.3 percent, though the category retained only 47.6 percent of its value), while the law of Heaven and Earth again made the Toyota Camry numero uno among midsize cars (48.1 percent).

Okay, so bigger is better for average resale values, but what about high-tech options and neat-o gadgets? That’s gotta mean something to a used car buyer, right?

Not so fast. More tech could net you a higher price if you were bartering a one-year-old model in your driveway after losing a poker game, but those options will be as dated as parachute pants and cassette tapes in five years.

“Shoppers interested in technology are probably going to gravitate toward new or near-new cars,” Edmunds’ features editor Carroll Lachnit told Extremetech.

Backup cameras, adaptive cruise control, blind-spot monitoring and high-end infotainment systems are rapidly becoming the norm even on entry-level models. In five years, there’ll be far more choice than today, and that could water down the impact such technology could exert over the price of a five-year-old model.

h/t Vipul Singh

[Image: © 2015 Kamil Kaluski/The Truth About Cars]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 69 comments
  • DenverMike DenverMike on Apr 16, 2016

    When resale value is ludicrous and stup!d high, it screams of "poor value proposition", when brand new. So this leads to thin showroom traffic for new ones, and too many waiting patiently and wringing their hands for clean a 3+ year old examples.

  • Kmars2009 Kmars2009 on Apr 17, 2016

    American tastes are weird. They value big trucks and SUVs, more than German luxury sedans. That's fine with me. Nothing sweeter than a 3-5 year old S Class at a FRACTION of it's original SRP. They are great cars, and people who buy them new, usually take great care of them.

  • Todd In Canada Mazda has a 3 year bumper to bumper & 5 year unlimited mileage drivetrain warranty. Mazdas are a DIY dream of high school auto mechanics 101 easy to work on reliable simplicity. IMO the Mazda is way better looking.
  • Tane94 Blue Mini, love Minis because it's total custom ordering and the S has the BMW turbo engine.
  • AZFelix What could possibly go wrong with putting your life in the robotic hands of precision crafted and expertly programmed machinery?
  • Orange260z I'm facing the "tire aging out" issue as well - the Conti ECS on my 911 have 2017 date codes but have lots (likely >70%) tread remaining. The tires have spent quite little time in the sun, as the car has become a garage queen and has likely had ~10K kms put on in the last 5 years. I did notice that they were getting harder last year, as the car pushes more in corners and the back end breaks loose under heavy acceleration. I'll have to do a careful inspection for cracks when I get the car out for the summer in the coming weeks.
  • VoGhost Interesting comments. Back in reality, AV is already here, and the experience to date has been that AV is far safer than most drivers. But I guess your "news" didn't tell you that, for some reason.
Next