Mercedes-Benz Expands Alabama Facilities, Deals With Labor Issues Ahead of C-Class Introduction

J.Emerson
by J.Emerson

Mercedes-Benz has been making improvements to its manufacturing facility near Tuscaloosa, Alabama in anticipation of the introduction of the all-new 2015 C-Class. On December 18, Mercedes held a grand opening ceremony for a new 900,000 square foot parts logistics center at the plant. Mercedes claims the $70 million dollar facility will employ 600 people.

Most of those new hires will be contract employees working for outside suppliers, but some will be directly employed by Mercedes as transfers from existing facilities. The facility will handle daily parts deliveries as part of the just-in-time production method. Governor Robert Bentley was in attendance, remarking that “Mercedes has been a great partner for Alabama” since the plant opened. Mercedes began production at the facility in 1997.

Mercedes says that the addition of C-Class production will add about 1,000 employees at the facility in total. That number may increase in 2015, when the company plans to add another SUV to the production line. Auto Evolution claims that new SUV will probably be the next-generation GLK. This is yet to be confirmed by Mercedes, but it seems likely given that the C-Class is built on the same platform. It would also make a logical replacement for the aged and slow-selling R-Class. Mercedes discontinued R-Class sales in the United States last year, but still produces the vehicle in Tuscaloosa for the world market.

The expansion of the Tuscaloosa facility, like the founding of VW’s Chattanooga plant, has created waves in labor relations around the globe. Building cars in Alabama is part of a global production strategy that has seen Mercedes parent company Daimler shift more capacity to America. When Daimler announced plans to transfer C-Class production out of its Sindelfingen, Germany facility back in 2009, it led to mass protests by workers affiliated with the union IG Metall. IG Metall has since backed unionization efforts at both Daimler and VW’s American facilities by the United Auto Workers, out of fear of being undercut by cheaper American labor. The UAW has lobbied Tuscaloosa workers extensively with IG Metall’s assistance, but has had no success thus far. The continued expansion of the facility will undoubtedly focus ever-greater attention on labor relations and compensation at the plant.

J.Emerson
J.Emerson

More by J.Emerson

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 7 comments
  • Ash78 Ash78 on Dec 23, 2013

    I actually believe our local laborers here in Alabama know that IG Metall (and to a lesser degree, the UAW) has some ulterior motives in trying to organize. After almost two decades of no success, I'm surprised they're still trying -- everyone I've known who has worked for the plant and its suppliers have been very pleased with the entire experience, from pay to benefits to specifically remaining a non-union shop. These people have an understanding that they can go work for an auto plant here for a 30%-50% wage increase over their existing non-auto jobs. They're not expecting to double their salaries and push their employer into obsolescence. It doesn't happen overnight, but with a global/mobile economy, people today have the benefit of hindsight -- it won't be like Detroit from 1950-1990 where the employers slowly shut down and move. It will be almost overnight thanks to manufacturing flexibility and worldwide competition.

  • DrGastro997 DrGastro997 on Dec 23, 2013

    American unions building German cars? Hasn't Mercedes and BMW learned their lesson? The ML still has significant quality issues, the 3 series Bimmer is no longer the ultimate driving machine and has lost its ranking to Toyota/Lexus. US Honda and Toyota has struggled for decades to meet stringent quality requirements with some improvement. American built Camry or Honda goes through numerous quality modifications before it can be exported for the Japanese market. I highly doubt the labor unions care about the end products its workers produce. It's just about lining up to punch out and get a paycheck without any company and brand loyalty. Unions are a very bad idea.

    • See 1 previous
    • Kyree Kyree on Dec 24, 2013

      Oh, please. The BMW 3-Series isn't and never was built here in the States, and it's status as an 'Ultimate Driving Machine' or not has nothing to do with quality, so that's irrelevant. However the X3, X5 and X6 are assembled here. And you can bet the head honchos are making sure that these cars meet quality standards, because they don't want costly warranty claims or brand tarnishing. It's one thing when your Bimmer is in the shop for a week---that comes with the territory. It's quite another thing when parts are actually falling off of your Bimmer as you drive, or you wind up getting soaked because the rubber seals weren't installed properly...and that's pretty much the extent of a factory's input on quality. Aside from rare cases, like GM forgetting to put some of the brake pads on a batch of Sonics, today's cars act up because of the engineering behind them...and engineering-quality *does* have to do with location.

  • Bob Hey Tassos, have you seen it with top down. It's a permanent roll bar so if it flips no problem. It's the only car with one permanently there. So shoots down your issue. I had a 1998 for 10 years it was perfect, but yes slow. Hardly ever see any of them anymore.
  • 3-On-The-Tree 2007 Toyota Sienna bedsides new plugs, flat tire on I-10 in van Horn Tx on the way to Fort Huachuca.2021 Tundra Crewmax no issues2021 Rav 4 no issues2010 Corolla I put in a alternator in Mar1985 Toyota Land Cruiser FJ60 280,000mi I put in a new radiator back in 08 before I deployed, did a valve job, new fuel and oil pump. Leaky rear main seal, transmission, transfer case. Rebuild carb twice, had a recall on the gas tank surprisingly in 2010 at 25 years later.2014 Ford F159 Ecoboost 3.5L by 80,000mi went through both turbos, driver side leaking, passenger side completely replaced. Rear min seal leak once at 50,000 second at 80,000. And last was a timing chain cover leak.2009 C6 Corvette LS3 Base, I put in a new radiator in 2021.
  • ChristianWimmer 2018 Mercedes A250 AMG Line (W177) - no issues or unscheduled dealer visits. Regular maintenance at the dealer once a year costs between 400,- Euros (standard service) to 1200,- Euros (major service, new spark plugs, brake pads + TÜV). Had one recall where they had to fix an A/C hose which might become loose. Great car and fun to drive and very economical but also fast. Recently gave it an “Italian tune up” on the Autobahn.
  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
Next