Supply Chain Bottleneck Due In Five Years According to Study

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

Bottlenecks are bad things to experience. Around 70,000 years ago, the Toba supervolcano eruption reduced humanity to anywhere from 1,000 to 10,000 breeding pairs — thus creating a genetic bottleneck — alongside a global cooling event concurrent with the Last Glacial Period.

For automakers in the United States and their North American supply chain, their Toba event is coming.

A study from Detroit consulting firm Harbour Results, Inc. warns that in five years’ time, the North American auto industry will experience a 40 percent bottleneck in their ability to screw together the cars and trucks we so love, due to falling short $6 billion in tooling capacity. As it stands, the industry will need $15.2 billion in tooling each year to avoid this fate; current industry capacity is $9.3 billion.

The issue isn’t helped by the fact that there are only 750 tool shops in North America, down a third from their peak in the late 1990s in part due to the global recession. On top of this, the average age of a toolmaker in each of the shops hovers around 52, with few new toolmakers coming up in the ranks to replace them; Harbour Results’ CEO Laurie Harbour states the training needed to bring aboard a toolmaker takes six years to complete.

On the other side, the automakers are planning to introduce 154 new models between now and 2018, a third alone coming down the ramps in 2014. With each new model requiring around 3,000 new tools to screw them all together, if not more due to increasing complexity, capacity can only continue to be strained.

Along with the other issues at hand, there’s also the fact that the automakers producing their goods in North America prefer to keep their business inside the NAFTA zone, ignoring Chinese toolmakers who could make the tooling needed quickly and cheaply. That said, Chinese and German toolmakers are planning to set up shop in the economic zone soon in an effort to encourage automakers to reach out for their tools once the latter opts to remove their blinders.

Another potential cause of the coming automotive production bottleneck? Disasters such as the Marl Chemical Park explosion in 2012, the Fukushima earthquake and tsunami in 2011, or a similar incident like the Lac-Mégantic derailment this year.

The only solution to all of these scenarios, in the words of Charlie Sheen, is for automakers to plan better by finding where the bottlenecks could occur, and promptly finding ways to avoid them, whether it’s through shifting key component manufacturing elsewhere or simplification of their latest and greatest.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 29 comments
  • Dimwit Dimwit on Nov 14, 2013

    Now you know what's behind efforts like VW's MQB platform engineering. A vastly reduced overhead for all the models they want to produce because of standardization. If the UAW/CAW were smart, they would be holding apprenticeship classes on a regular basis to get new members into the fold instead of trying to force assembly plants to unionize.

    • Tresmonos Tresmonos on Nov 14, 2013

      The majority of tooling is out of reach of the UAW workforce. Stamping dies are about the only tooling the OEM skilled trades work on. And man are those guys worth their pay.

  • ED I don't know what GM is thinking.I have a 2020 one nice vehicle.Got rid of Camaro and was going to buy one.Probably won't buy another GM product.Get rid of all the head honchos at GM.This company is a bunch of cheapskates building junk that no one wants.
  • Lostjr Sedans have been made less practical, with low rooflines and steeply raked A pillars. It makes them harder to get in and out of. Probably harder to put a kid in a child seat. Sedans used to be more family oriented.
  • Bob Funny how Oldsmobile was offering a GPS system to help if you were lost, yet GM as a company was very lost. Not really sure that they are not still lost. They make hideous looking trucks, Cadillac is a crappy Chevy pretending to be fancy. To be honest, I would never step in a GM show room now or ever. Boring, cheap ugly and bad resale why bother. I get enough of GM when i rent on trips from airports. I have to say, does anybody at GM ever drive what everyone else drives? Do they ever then look at what crap they put out in style fit and finish? Come on, for real, do they? Cadillac updated slogan should be " sub standard of the 3rd world", or " almost as good as Tata motors". Enough said.
  • Sam Jacobs I want a sedan. When a buy a car or even rent one, I don’t want to ride up high. I don’t want a 5-door. I want a trunk to keep my stuff out of sight. It’s quieter, cars handle better, I don’t need to be at the same height as a truck. I have a 2022 Subaru Legacy Touring XT, best car ever, equipped as a luxury sedan, so quick and quiet. I don’t understand automakers’ decisions to take away sedans or simply stop updating them — giving up the competition. The Camry and Accord should not be our only choices. Impala and Fusion were beautiful when they were axed.
  • Spamvw I think you need to remember WHY the big 2 and 1/2 got out of the car business. Without going political, the CAFE standards signed into law meant unless you had a higher gas mileage fleet, you couldn't meet the standards.The Irony is that, the law made sedans so small with low roof lines, that normal people migrated to SUV's and Trucks. Now we get worse mileage than before.
Next