PSA: Business Model for Joint Small Car With GM "Just Wasn't There"

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

The next Citroen C3 and Peugeot 208 will not share a platform with Opel’s Corsa as originally planned

In the wake of news that China’s Dongfeng Motors is going to take an equity stake in PSA/Peugeot Citroen, the French automaker says that it is scaling back its alliance with General Motors, which owns 7% of PSA. PSA said that a planned joint subcompact platform that was seen as the basis of the tie-up with GM will probably be cancelled. “Further analysis showed that the business model just wasn’t there,” a PSA spokesman said. Financial statements released by PSA say that anticipated savings of $1 billion due to synergies with GM will be adjusted downward.

The cancelled platform was supposed to have underpinned replacements for the Peugeot 208, Citroen C3 and Opel Corsa. Barclay’s analyst Kristina Church said that a common small car was “absolutely key” to the partnership.”It certainly seems GM has no focus on the alliance with Peugeot any more. They don’t want to be partnered with a struggling company, and they have alternative methods to turn things around [in Europe],” Church said.

Still, GM and PSA spokesmen said that the alliance is going forward. “We have other projects under review. Some projects are not economically feasible, which is why they are dropped, but we’re taking the projects one-by-one and examining their economic feasibility first,” a PSA rep said. The companies will still produce a jointly developed small minivan at GMs Zaragoza, Spain factory starting in 2016. “We are moving forward with the implementation” of the projects which have already been agreed upon, Ulrich Weber said for GM.

The deal with GM was originally a main part of PSA CEO Philippe Varin’s strategy to turnaround the struggling French carmaker. Working with a company of GM’s size was seen as a way of reducing costs. After GM took a 7 percent stake in PSA in February, 2012 the automakers announced plans for at least five joint vehicle and powertrain programs. However, soon afterwards, GM revealed that SAIC, it’s partner in China could veto some of the plans.

Remaining are the upcoming small minivan and another joint vehicle development program working on a crossover, along with joint purchasing. PSA did say that so far joint purchasing has saved the company about 60 million euros so far this year.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 15 comments
  • Shipwright Shipwright on Oct 24, 2013

    ”It certainly seems GM has no focus on the alliance with Peugeot any more. They don’t want to be partnered with a struggling company, and they have alternative methods to turn things around [in Europe],” Seriously? When did GM decide that PSA was struggling, before or after they invested in them? What a load of BS. GM knowingly got into bed with a very weak PSA much to the consternation and confusion of the best and brightest here and now they decide they want to back out. What a huge waste of limited capital.

    • Pch101 Pch101 on Oct 24, 2013

      Initially, GM appeared to be setting up PSA as a place to dump a failing Opel, as it planned to build its European sales with Korean-made Chevys. But Chevy has had disappointing sales in Europe, while South Korea is becoming less attractive by the day. So now the resources are moving back to Opel, while expectations for GM Korea are being downgraded. With the new gameplan to fix Opel, the PSA relationship loses its value.

  • Asdf Asdf on Oct 24, 2013

    Yet another automaker selling out to the Chinese. Did someone pay Victor Muller top bucks in order to come up with this immensely brilliant strategy? Or was it masterminded in-house by those responsible for nearly running PSA into the ground? Whatever happened to competent leadership, and valuing the importance of retaining strategic assets...

    • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Oct 24, 2013

      There was no one mastermind involved in running PSA into the ground. It was a combination of the Euro, incredibly anti-competitive government work rules, the emergence of eastern Europe as low cost competition, and European demographics. Renault partnered with Nissan which has a strong leadership, and embraced global sales in time. You might blame the Peugeot family for their reluctance to give up control, but PSA needed a strong partner and expansion into global markets long ago.

  • Bike Rather have a union negotiating my pay rises with inflation at the moment.
  • Bike Poor Redapple won't be sitting down for a while after opening that can of Whiparse
  • Rover Sig 2021 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited, like my previous JGC's cheap to keep (essentially just oil, tires) until recent episode of clunking in front suspension at 50K miles led to $3000 of parts replaced over fives visits to two Jeep dealers which finally bought a quiet front end. Most expensive repair on any vehicle I've owned in the last 56 years.
  • Bob Hey Tassos, have you seen it with top down. It's a permanent roll bar so if it flips no problem. It's the only car with one permanently there. So shoots down your issue. I had a 1998 for 10 years it was perfect, but yes slow. Hardly ever see any of them anymore.
  • 3-On-The-Tree 2007 Toyota Sienna bedsides new plugs, flat tire on I-10 in van Horn Tx on the way to Fort Huachuca.2021 Tundra Crewmax no issues2021 Rav 4 no issues2010 Corolla I put in a alternator in Mar1985 Toyota Land Cruiser FJ60 280,000mi I put in a new radiator back in 08 before I deployed, did a valve job, new fuel and oil pump. Leaky rear main seal, transmission, transfer case. Rebuild carb twice, had a recall on the gas tank surprisingly in 2010 at 25 years later.2014 Ford F159 Ecoboost 3.5L by 80,000mi went through both turbos, driver side leaking, passenger side completely replaced. Rear min seal leak once at 50,000 second at 80,000. And last was a timing chain cover leak.2009 C6 Corvette LS3 Base, I put in a new radiator in 2021.
Next