Detroit Jury Awards Millions In Malcolm Bricklin Fraud Suit Regarding Chery/Qoros JV

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

Visionary Vehicles’ envisioned dealership

Malcolm Bricklin’s company, V Cars (formerly Visionary Vehicles), was awarded $2 million by a Detroit jury in U.S. District court. The lawsuit was filed after Bricklin’s failed effort to set up a joint venture with Chery to produce Chinese made cars for the North American market. The jury ruled that KCA Engineering, a company founded by former Visionary executive Dennis Gore while he was still an employee of Bricklin’s startup, had committed fraud as well as a number of other misdeeds. When Gore was first hired by Visionary, Bricklin said it was because of his expertise with Asian car manufacturers.

In the suit, V Cars LLC v. KCA Engineering LLC, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, No. 2:11-cv-12805, Bricklin accused Gore of using V Car’s proprietary information to assist Chery in launching the Qoros Automobile Co, in a joint venture with the Israel Corp holding company, controlled by the Ofer family.

Malcolm Bricklin and Chery CEO Yin Tongyao in cheerier days

Chery and Visionary Vehicles entered into a joint venture in December 2004. Weeks later Bricklin staged a guerrilla press conference in the lobby of Cobo Hall during the 2005 NAIAS media preview to hype the project, predicting that they’d be selling 150,000 Chinese cars in the United States by 2007. The JV was cancelled in 2006.

The suit against KCA is just one of a number of lawsuits filed by Bricklin in an assortment of countries to try collect damages over his soured deal with Chery. Litigation is continuing in V Cars LLC v. Chery Automobile Co et al., which seeks over a billion dollars in damages and lost projected earnings for what Bricklin claims was racketeering on the part of Chery.

In a 2009 interview with Car & Drive r, Bricklin didn’t hold back on what he thought of Chery:

When Chery went from the bastard child of China to its favored son—because of what we were doing—and companies like Chrysler began to court them, they decided to see if they could screw me. Thought they would see if they could take it all back, and they did, and we’re suing them for $14 billion. China has the ability, they have the talent, they had the opportunity, but they don’t yet understand you can’t do business in the rest of the world the way they do business in China. Knowing what I know now, I wouldn’t have gone anywhere near them.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Rod Panhard Rod Panhard on Jul 30, 2013

    1. "Detroit Jury Awards Millions..." Technically, it's correct, but "millions" implies way more than "two million." Points against TTAC for that. 2. If Pricklin sought $14 billion and was awarded $2 million, it sounds like a pyrrhic victory, at best. His attorneys fees will be at least 1/3 of the sum, so that's about $1.2 million, over six years, or maybe about $200,000 per year. Assuming the Chinese pay up, that's one difficult way to make that kind of money.

  • Geekcarlover Geekcarlover on Jul 30, 2013

    I know I'm not the only one who saw the words "Bricklin" and "fraud", and assumed he was the defendant.

  • Zerofoo Some high school kid is going to love this car.
  • Tane94 Model names from the past are not the answer. Cadillac is still recovering from the New York Joe deNysche error. What is Cadillac's identity? It walked away from its Standard of Excellence image long ago. Is it Electric Luxury? European Luxury built here? luxury performance? I don't know. Is all-electric models by 2030 still the goal?
  • MaintenanceCosts (1) Crash program to redesign all of the interiors, now, to banish all evidence of cost-cutting and have at least as much flash as current Mercedes.(2) XT6 gets the 3.0T engine. Both XT6 and XT5 get an Acura-style AWD system that will make them stop feeling so much like front-drivers.(3) XT6, XT5, and CT5 all get a restyle along the lines of the '89 restyle of the DeVille and co. - that is, add length even with overhang if you have to, add swagger, add fancy.(4) New platform for large unibody SUVs, either electric or hybrid, to compete straight across with the top two Range Rover models. If they are going to be a real luxury brand they need SUVs more refined than the Escalade. Keep selling the Escalade alongside the new ones for the existing cigarette-boat audience.(5) XT4 and CT4 get put out of their misery, or maybe brought back as Buicks.
  • Jkross22 Cadillac - We took over the sport sedan market (what's left of it) from BMW. Oh and we also have this Escalade that everyone loves and this EV that looks like Peugeot designed it.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X I would only buy with manual. Even if the auto is repaired, it will most likely fail again. Just a bad design.
Next