Ur-Turn: Why Buy A Mitsubishi? One Reader's Experience

by Ur-Turn

Published: August 28th, 2012

ur turn why buy a mitsubishi one reader s experience

|Reader Josh Howard relates the story of why he recommended a Mitsubishi to a co-worker…he’s a brave soul

After reading Derek’s excellent piece on Mitsubishi and their irrelevance in the American marketplace, I began thinking about the brand, and their history in the United States. A few months ago, I went against my better instincts and actually recommended one to a coworker despite knowing what Mitsubishi turned into in the early 2000’s…not to mention a turbocharged DSM car some years prior.

But, before you condemn me, consider the situation. The person in question is an early twenties receptionist/sales assistant whom I work with She’s kind and smart and most certainly capable of deciding on a car for herself. The woman’s done well for herself, but money has been tight as she prepares to get married. Her previous vehicle, a 1999 Jeep Cherokee Sport (and my current beater) gave her more problems than she could endure.

As most people know, these Jeeps are prone to chronic overheating as they age and the radiators get stopped up. Eventually, she came to work so frustrated one day that I told her I’d take it off her hands just so she wouldn’t have to worry about it.

In the following weeks, she drove her fiance’s older Chevy pickup truck to work and commenced her search for a car. Being a very long time Nissan owner, I recommended a used Altima or two. Our location in the Detroit area meant that domestic cars fresh off lease would be an appealing alternative

Fusions and Sebrings were looked at, but reject. My Altima recommendation ended up being out of her range with too many miles. Then, the ’09 Mitsubishi Galant showed up. It was metallic white, always looked clean, was newer than the other cars she looked at, had very low miles, and was ‘Japanese’ with a small engine. She almost immediately wanted a test drive.

In comparison to anything she had been driving, the Mitsubishi seemed luxurious, sporty, and everything worked! The price was thousands less than the competition and she felt comfortable driving it. It excited her and the thought of having a newer car that was reliable, got better mileage, and was fun for her to drive was enough to convince her to chat with me about it.

When she came back to work the next day, I knew what she was going to get. After questioning her, there was no doubt in my mind where her money was going. She was visibly excited to have driven what she felt was a ‘sporty sedan’ that was also economical. And, she immediately could see herself taking it home. That… right there… THAT is what sells any car as others on this site will attest.

Why did I write this? Because, I feel like most of the comments to the article leave one thing out…perception. Her view was not like us car buffs. She looked for different traits than we look for. Even when sitting in and driving cars side by side, she experienced things differently. We tend to forget that prior vehicle history easily convinces people to buy brands that they wouldn’t normally think of. In her mind, Mitsubishi was a Japanese car brand that made sporty and relatively reliable cars. How could I say “no, don’t buy that” to her? In the day and age where most every car is reliable, isn’t happiness enough? Why buy a Mitsubishi? Because, it fits into your budget and you enjoy driving it regardless of the emblem on the grill… that’s what’s really important.

#Cars #Mitsubishi #MitsubishiGalant #Ur-Turn

Ur-Turn

More by Ur-Turn

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 48 comments

Chicagoland on Sep 08, 2012

I realized weeks after this was posted that the Galant is dropped for 2013. So, it is an orphan car, meaning, even worse resale and parts availabilty. Mitsu has pulled the plug, and the lady who thought the car was a 'good deal' will get a 'good life lesson' in car ownership when she tries to sell or fix it. Should tell anyone the truth about a car being discontinued. If they still buy, then good luck to them.

Like Reply
LALoser on Sep 08, 2012

Six months ago I bought a new Lancer Ralliart, the following are my thoughts: 1- Looks boy-racer enough to be fun, but not over the top. 2- Only 3000 miles on it, but no problems at all. 3- Ride can be jarring over bad roads, but it pays off in taking corners like a slot-car. I would never push this car to its limits as a commuter. 4- Interior is hard plastic, black, drab. I do not care about this, the fun more than makes up for it. 5- People may or may not be impressed with the badge, again, it does not matter to me as I live my own life and pay my own bills. 6- Paid 25K for it and got .9% interest with a bumper to bumper 5 year warranty, unlimited miles. For a fun car, AWD, warranty good enough for me, it seemed and still is a much better deal than a drab 2WD model.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.